By explaining away the violent portrayals of God in the Old Testament, or by calling
such evil actions as «good,» we are trying to get God down off the cross.
seeing we atheists are committing
such evil actions as equality and freedom of choice for females, what are you doing to stop us?
Not exact matches
Well it is true that some people seek sorcerers to implement Jinn that are satanic demons into mankind or his house or his business to finish him or make his life miserable or to stop flow of his business income... In
such case it is either you are religious enough and say your prayers often then it becomes hard for this to harm you or otherwise you need to find some one who practice exorcism to remove this
evil... But many are just pretending to be good at it and help you not but squeeze money out of you with tales and stories... There is another type of possessions and that is not through a sorcerer but directly by coincidence what man is at his weakest moments and those weakest moments for a possessions are when you come through a great fear or when cry or laugh loudly in hysteria, or during a certain moment of mating... or even when sneezing loudly... That's why there are prayers to be said on daily basis to guard you from
such things and specially if passing haunted places
such as deserted houses but most
evil ones are residents of public toilets and market places... Some of them even would claim that you have made a wrong
action by which you have killed a dear one to them and for that they have possessed you and that is mostly night time
such as throwing a cigaret butt to a dark place or stepping killing an insect or even an animal at night which could have been one of them or possessed by one of them... So this is true thing happening to many who suffer unexplainable illnesses or sufferings which could look like mental illness that comes and goes as pleased...
In the name of this theology (which is in part that of the World Council of Churches), Christians are induced to participate unreservedly and with a good conscience in political or scientific
action; for, they are told, whatever
evil there might be in
such action will necessarily be overruled by the good.
without a basis to rightly label
evil as
such, why would you need «compassion» if the
action was supposedly or potentially justified?
@NAH — Sorry, I don't believe in a universal morality, I don't believe in good and
evil as
such, just right
action and wrong
action.
josef: «Sorry, I don't believe in a universal morality, I don't believe in good and
evil as
such, just right
action and wrong
action.
He concludes that more attention to the Bible did not necessarily mean more virtuous
action; that personal engagement with the Bible did result in self - sacrificing service, but also in divisive hubris, mistaken interpretations (
such as the identification of America with ancient Israel), and blindness to social
evils; and that Protestant spiritual individualism undercut corrupt hierarchies and supported democracy, but also promoted political excesses and violent anti-Catholicism.
Such actions are
evil, right?
We even pin the label of
evil on
such actions when performed by others, unless we pause long enough to remember that we are condemning ourselves by this judgment of them.
Such action would have to be thought of as analogous to that of the angels, who so dispose of themselves in one act, that from the centre of their nature and freedom they are fixed and confirmed in good, or hardened in the
evil they have chosen.
There had been
such muddles over the complex ticketing arrangements, and
such hostility from sections of the mass media, and
such horrible things said by campaigners opposed to the Church's teachings, and
such tragedy over the
evil actions of priests who had betrayed their calling.
God could also mediate the free
actions of
such souls to one another, taking care to harmonize any potential conflicts by means of conceptual supplementation, thus overcoming any
evil consequent upon the free
actions of many actualities acting in concert.
Such a perspective would enable us to deal responsibly and creatively without own involvement and complicity in
evil, without claiming that all
actions are equally guilty.
On the other hand, God must so act in the interests of both the self and all others as thereby to establish the cosmic order of natural law that sets the optimal limits of all other
action, where by «optimal limits» I mean limits
such that, were they to be set otherwise than they are, the ratio between opportunities for good and risks of
evil would be less rather than more favorable than it in fact is.
The absence of
action against
evil would be consistent with the existence of an
evil or at least an uncaring god, which is not impossible, but few people believe in
such a god.
The
evil actions of one animal may affect many,
such as a bobcat killing a mother duck may lead to the death of her newborn ducklings.
«It's impossible to be prepared for
actions that reek of
such evil,» said Rabbi Richard Rheins of Temple Sinai in Denver.
«I was interested in his struggle between good and
evil and wanted to figure out if there really was
such a black - and - white way to describe a person's
actions.»
Paul W.S. Anderson is the man responsible for guilty pleasure
action flicks
such as RESIDENT
EVIL, DEATH RACE and THE THREE MUSKETEERS, and with...
Resident
Evil: Apocalypse gives us the same amount of
action, but the scares are mild, while Witt injects a cheesy quality to the proceedings that suggests that even he finds it difficult to take
such a ridiculous storyline seriously.
Previous Resident
Evil entries
such as Resident
Evil 5 or Resident
Evil 6 were criticized for being more like typical
action games than traditional survival horror games.
Such interferences are not in themselves evil or malicious; they may be well - meaning, such as a friend who expresses concern about an action we plan to t
Such interferences are not in themselves
evil or malicious; they may be well - meaning,
such as a friend who expresses concern about an action we plan to t
such as a friend who expresses concern about an
action we plan to take.
This is an «old school» survival horror game not an
action survival horror
such as Resident
Evil and for a lot of people it isn't necessarily the experience they were looking for as can be noted by some of the reviews.
The newer games in the series,
such as Resident
Evil 4 and Resident
Evil 5, have focused more on
action... Read More
I think it'd have to go beyond just a «he thought he was a hero» arc and make it more about what it means to be
evil and why anyone would follow
such actions.
These days, however, most FPS and
action games (
such as Resident
Evil 5 and Grand Theft Auto 4) are highly polished, have multi-million dollar budgets, and are being created by huge powerhouses.
This is an
action - adventure game in which players assume the roles of characters from franchises
such as Batman, Lord of the Rings, and The Lego Movie as they try to stop an
evil mastermind.
Unless you've got a series that works wonders in
action horror (
such as Resident
Evil)...
But this cause isn't advanced by exaggerating what is known in order to scare people into
action, nor by denouncing everybody who disagrees with
such proposals as
evil or idiotic.»
Founded in 1979 and located in Osaka, Japan, they were the pioneers of the fighting game genre with seminal 90's smash hit Street Fighter 2 and creators of other huge IP's
such as Resident
Evil (survival horror), Devil May Cry (stylish
action) and Monster Hunter (Co-operative RPG).
Studio Wildcards» open - world survival
action - adventure game was always likely to top December, seeming it was the only big release that month, but January saw many big releases
such as Capcom's Resident
Evil 7: Biohazard, making it's second month feat very impressive.