Sentences with phrase «such expert opinion»

He cited Brexit as an example of a rejection of such expert opinion.

Not exact matches

Because the technology is constantly evolving, any book you read is already outdated; in order to stay on the cutting edge of search engine progress, ensure you continuously update your knowledge by reading articles (such as this one), staying up to date on new algorithms, analyzing your competitors» successes and failures, and consult expert opinions and insights.

I will not engage in a contest of pitting «experts» opinions against each other as such an exercise is as pointless as biblical proof texting.

Additionally, he is often called on to resolve differences of opinion between contract winemakers and their clients and has been engaged as expert witness in legal cases involving wine quality, value and technical issues, such as closures.

Your opinion does not reflect the opinion of Arsenal Fans and your absurd article should never been put up on this page Do you Honestly think that publicly criticizing Arsenal and Arsene during a period when the club are struggling is of any benefit when did he become such an expert in football anyway??? let's be honest he's not exactly a picture of Health any more outbursts from Usmanov and there should be banners at the emirates with

With such major acquisitions for teams in major markets, we were curious to see how the opinions of so - called experts compared to that of oddsmakers.

This is an opinion that is shared by several experts, such as the Lafayette Regional Vein and Laser Center.

Such differences of opinion on parenting styles between authors or experts continue today.

AppoLearning relies on the opinions of experts such as teachers and tech blogs to pick apps.

b. TXBC may seek advice or an opinion letter from an independent expert on matters of interpretation of the International Code of Marketing of Breast - milk Substitutes (such as the International Baby Food Action Network [IBFAN] or the National Alliance for Breastfeeding Advocacy [NABA]-RRB-.

To narrow down the field, we looked at expert opinions from review sites such as The Sweethome, CNET and Good Housekeeping.

I appreciate the expert opinions that we are fortunate enough to have such easy access to.

How have expert political observers evaluated these actions taken by Pakistan against terrorism since December 2014 in response to the Peshawar Army School attack, and what is the published opinion of senior political experts regarding the efficacy of such measures?

«NOAH believes that any such decisions must be based on independent regulatory officials» expert opinions and must follow the agreed regulatory process — such as the recent EMA (European Medicines Agency) re-evaluation of the veterinary use of colistin,» Dawn Howard says.

UNTIL recently, both common sense and much expert opinion, such as that of psychiatrists John Bowlby and Michael Rutter, have held that the main influence on people's personality and outlook is parental upbringing.

Our findings stress the need for frequent re-evaluation of practices and policies based on guideline recommendations, particularly in cases where such recommendations rely primarily on expert opinion or limited clinical evidence,» the authors write.

Thus BiK - F is helping to implement international agreements, such as the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the EU Habitats Directive, the EU Water Framework Directive and the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive, through the provision of scientific services and expert opinions to various stakeholders in society.

But this is not the end of the debate because other experts are of the opinion that exercising for short bursts of high intensity followed by short bursts of low intensity such as sprinting for a certain distance, and then gently jogging whist your heart slows down and then sprinting again, is a better way of exercising the heart simply because for a short period your heart has to work a lot harder than it could for a sustained time such as 30 minutes.

It has been my experience and is the opinion of many experts that heavy metals such as mercury and lead are the underlying cause of candida.

The scores assigned to the brands are based on a row of factors, such as experts» opinions, user experience, comments, popularity, and conversion rates, but the scoring should not be relied upon for accuracy, as it is determined by selectbestsexdatingsites.com in its sole discretion.

With an explanation, that it is bad to integrate such subjects into the schools without previous opinion, expert polls, and other sorts of necessary preparations.

Add on to this the extra cost of any support contacts you have with third parties, such as your infrastructure or wireless, and any consultants you might use occasionally for that expert opinion, and your IT budget could easily be at least # 26,000 overspent.

I can't find any developmental psychologist willing to support such cautions, and the only person I could find willing to go on the record with an opinion on the subject was my nephew Dominic, age 7, who admittedly isn't an expert on these matters.

The Secretary shall consult with the Office of Management and Budget, each rating agency providing such an opinion letter, and any other financial experts the Secretary deems necessary, in order to determine the credit instrument's appropriate subsidy cost (capital reserve) pursuant to the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990.

Outline your action steps such as what exactly you are going to do to invest, what strategies will you follow to study the market, where and how will you search for and find the relevant facts, which experts, agents or other investors you will meet to get advice or opinion from, etc..

You need to understand the independence and qualifications of experts who provide opinions about the scheme so you know how much you can rely on such opinions.

And like all experts, each new issue always seems to kick off with a somewhat innocuous disclosure, then evolves into a frenzied scramble... to be followed by a detailed explanation of how they always knew such a risk existed *, but in their opinion (just like the rest of the industry) it was considered a remote & improbable risk (that existed outside normal codes of industry practice).

They just won't stop, even when you confront them with IRS documentation of exactly who paid their «climate experts» (most of whom turn out to be mining engineers or some such) for their opinions.

It's important to note that Russell does not claim that if all experts are agreed, then one must agree with them, but solely that being certain of the opposite opinion in such circumstances is not wise.

In this case, the committee might have discovered more than a few papers by one of them on the subject, such as Risbey and Kandlikar (2002) «Expert Assessment of Uncertainties in Detection and Attribution of Climate Change» in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, or that Prof. Risbey was a faculty member in Granger Morgan's Engineering and Public Policy department at CMU for five years, a place awash in expert elicitation of climate (I sent my abstract to Prof. Morgan — who I know from my AGU uncertainty quantification days — for his opinion before submitting it to the conference).

Now, as to the meaning of such a strong scientific consensus - that's important because laypeople (quite wisely) will take expert opinions into consideration when deciding public policy.

With issues that are not polarized, people in general trust expert opinion - such as with GMOs and vaccines.

Maybe you're smarter than the predominant opinion among experts — but two questions need to be asked: (1) to what degree is your view of the evidenced biased by your ideological identity (you clearly have a very strong ideological identity on this issue) and, (2) how could you possibly state a certainty about such a counterfactual in such a highly uncertain context?

The authors note that Oreskes» methodology is further flawed because it also surveyed the opinions and writings of «nonscientists who may write about climate, but are by no means experts on or even casually familiar with the science dealing with attribution — that is, attributing a specific climate effect (such as a temperature increase) to a specific cause (such as rising CO2 levels).»

The authors note that Oreskes» methodology is further flawed because it also surveyed the opinions and writings of «nonscientists who may write about climate, but are by no means experts on or even casually familiar with the science dealing with attribution — that is, attributing a specific climate effect (such as a temperature increase) to a specific cause (such as rising CO

I just suggested that, for the one thread where Dr. Meier was giving us the benefit of his expert opinion, we should leave off posts such as «Dr. Meier is an idiot», or «What about cosmic rays?».

Please can you define «expert in climate science», trace a limit of what is included and what is not, and tell me why such experts working / providing opinion to the IPCC are more trustworthy of other experts of the field who do not?

I have been researching the second of Dr. Wolff's points for over a year now, exchanging opinions with experts in relevant fields such as Professor Alley, Professor Jeff Severinghaus, Professor Michael Bender, Professor Hartmut Frank, Professor Zbiniew Jaworowski, Dr. William Connolley (you may know him), etc..

It is being led by the University of Ottawa's Institute for Science, Society and Policy and involves more than two dozen researchers from a dozen universities who have expertise in areas such as: policy, regulation and governance; transition economics and energy technology; and public opinion, trust in policy making and expert knowledge.

When I've read such comments, I haven't usually read them to mean that one should not research something for themselves, but that expert opinion has value and as such should not be rejected out of hand.

How do you gather your expert opinion in such cases?

Indeed, in a motion arguing against the independent expert, Google stated its fear that such an expert «will have a powerful stamp of court approval and objectivity that will lend a disproportionate weight to that expert's opinions and testimony.»

For many years he has worked with such experts by providing legal opinions in relation to their servicing the electronic records management systems of large institutions.

I really don't know, but then again neither do appellate experts such as Howard Bashman, who writes, «Just when you thought that every possible type of appellate opinion had already been created, Ninth Circuit Chief Judge Alex Kozinski goes and invents one more.»

I know from my experience: (1) as a legal advisor since 1978, in the creation of national standards for records management; and, (2) working with such experts since 1988, to provide legal opinions that accompany such experts» certifications of compliance of institutional clients» ERMSs with records management standards, how very prevalent, bad and inadequate electronic records management is.

If the parents are unable to resolve their differences through mediation, the court may appoint a third person, such as a psychologist experienced in working with divided families, to evaluate the case and provide an expert opinion regarding the most appropriate custody and parental access orders.

Something is wrong or we wouldn't have such an array of problems (chronicled even in the mainstream press) with the quality of expert opinion evidence in the personal injury context.

Counsel need to ensure that the expert witness understands matters such as the difference between the legal burden of proof and scientific certainty, the need to clarify the facts and assumptions underlying the expert's opinion, the need to confine the report to matters within the expert witness's area of expertise and the need to avoid usurping the court's function as the ultimate arbiter of the issues.

Clearly, something is wrong or we wouldn't have such an array of problems (chronicled even in the mainstream press) with the quality of expert opinion evidence in the personal injury context.

10) Obtain expert opinion (s) from those such as geriatric psychiatrists (s) who never met the deceased.