As a Brit of a certain generation
such false choices always put me in mind of Margaret Thatcher's dictum of TINA (There is No Alternative).
Not exact matches
If there is
such a battle, it's not a
false cause (as evils could be either directly derivative from that battle or indirectly, via influences and
choices arising from Satan's alleged rebellion).
That this is a
false choice is plain to anyone who knows
such figures as Dorothy Day, William Stringfellow, Fanny Lou Hamer, Oscar Romero, André Trocme,...
If the pupils are led to understand that all myths are
false, we have the
choice either of denying that
such literature is mythical or of asserting that myths carry meanings not otherwise communicable.
The serious problems, the continuing shambles of his office management, the lack of clear political direction, the myth of the «
false choice» prospectus; these are still within his grasp, and as
such, still within his gift to solve.
A basic strategy for multiple -
choice questions is to look for key words
such as «always» and «never,» which often indicate that the question or a potential answer is
false or incorrect.
Custom quizzes and tests are often more costly, while text - only tests (
such as multiple
choice or true /
false) generally require fewer resources, which make them less expensive.
Technology supports the use of different question types
such as fill in the blank, match the following, multiple
choice, and true and
false questions.
Multiple
choice and true /
false questions are ideal for qualitative data,
such as comprehension of compliance topics.
Designing
such an authentic learner focused eLearning assessment is much tougher than created multiple
choice or true /
false questions - but it is more fulfilling as well.
Questions appear in formats
such as fill in the blanks, matching items, true /
false, multiple
choice, and more.
Of course, this immediate scoring requires that the teacher use selected - response items,
such as multiple
choice, matching, true or
false, and the like.
The Brisbane Times reports that consumer organisation,
Choice, has complained to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, saying
such ads are
false and misleading, with their «big beer, tiny footprint» tagline.
It's a
false assumption, I believe, that
choice among people in
such situations is a matter of measurable, agreed - upon qualities enabling us to compare apples with comfort.