Sentences with phrase «such fraudulent acts»

Not exact matches

Prior to Spitzer's tenure, it was mostly used for smaller financial violations, such as «shady pharmacists, Ponzi schemes, and peddlers of fraudulent Salvador Dali lithographs,» according to a 2004 article in Legal Affairs by Nicholas Thompson, published prior to the revelation of the Bernie Madoff Ponzi scheme, for which Andrew Cuomo used the Martin Act when he was attorney general.

Such profiles usually have photographs of beautiful women; but unfortunately, such profiles are managed by someone either with the knowledge of the admin aimed at perpetrating fraudulent aSuch profiles usually have photographs of beautiful women; but unfortunately, such profiles are managed by someone either with the knowledge of the admin aimed at perpetrating fraudulent asuch profiles are managed by someone either with the knowledge of the admin aimed at perpetrating fraudulent acts.

Remarkably, the claim by Every Student Succeeds Act advocates such as Senator Lamar Alexander — that it gives back some authority to both state and local governments at the same time it reduces federal control of local schools — has not been recognized as the fraudulent claim it is.

Some even encouraged consumers to engage in fraudulent acts to accomplish such extraordinary results.

Hotel Name 1 may at any time and without notice terminate or restrict a person \'s ability to submit a claim under or otherwise benefit from the Best Price Guarantee, if in its sole discretion Hotel Name 1 determines that such person has: (1) acted in a manner inconsistent with applicable laws or ordinances; (2) acted in a fraudulent or abusive manner, (3) submitted multiple invalid Best Price Guarantee claims; (4) failed to stay at Hotel Name 1 Hotels after receiving approved Best Price Guarantee Claims; or (5) breached any of these BPG Terms.

Starwood may at any time and without notice terminate or restrict a person's ability to submit a claim under or otherwise benefit from the Best Rate Guarantee, if in its sole discretion Starwood determines that such person has: (1) acted in a manner inconsistent with applicable laws or ordinances; (2) acted in a fraudulent or abusive manner, (3) submitted multiple invalid Best Rate Guarantee claims; (4) failed to stay at Starwood Hotels after receiving approved Best Rate Guarantee Claims; or (5) breached any of these BRG Terms.

MGM Resorts International may at any time and without notice terminate or restrict a person's ability to submit a claim under or otherwise benefit from the Best Rate Guarantee, if in its sole discretion MGM Resorts determines that such person has: (1) acted in a manner inconsistent with applicable laws or ordinances; (2) acted in a fraudulent or abusive manner; (3) submitted multiple invalid Best Rate Guarantee claims; (4) failed to stay at an MGM Resorts destination after receiving approved Best Rate Guarantee claims; or (5) breached any of these Best Rate Guarantee terms.

To have offered the advice the plaintiff claimed he should have given would have been illegal and unethical, as such a course of action would have been contrary to the Fraudulent Conveyances Act and the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act.

p. 5 A man is not to be deprived of his legal rights unless he has acted in such a way as would make it fraudulent for him to set up those rights.

Where the alleged fraudulent act is not in the nature of deceit or falsehood, such as a misrepresentation of fact, the causal link between the dishonest conduct and the deprivation may not depend on showing that the victim relied on or was induced to act by the fraudulent act.

Our firm has experience in attacking fraudulent conveyance and preferences, including by using Ontario legislation such as the Assignments and Preferences Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. A. 33; the Fraudulent Conveyances Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. F. 2; and the Absconding Debtors Act, R.S.O. 1990fraudulent conveyance and preferences, including by using Ontario legislation such as the Assignments and Preferences Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. A. 33; the Fraudulent Conveyances Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. F. 2; and the Absconding Debtors Act, R.S.O. 1990Fraudulent Conveyances Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. F. 2; and the Absconding Debtors Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. A. 2.

SimplyInsured may disclose personal information if required to do so by law or in the good faith belief that such action is necessary to: (1) conform to the edicts of the law, comply with legal process served on SimplyInsured, or take precautions against liability; (2) protect SimplyInsured and others from fraudulent, abusive, predatory, or unlawful uses or activity; (3) investigate and defend SimplyInsured against any third party claims or allegations; (4) protect and defend the rights or property of SimplyInsured; or (5) act in urgent circumstances to protect the personal safety of users of SimplyInsured, the Service, or the public.

We do not cover: 1) loss or expense recoverable under any other insurance or through an employer; 2) loss or expense arising from or attributable to: (a) dishonest or criminal acts committed or attempted by You; (b) alleged violation of the laws of the country You are visiting, unless We determine such allegations to be fraudulent, or c) failure to maintain required documents or visas; 3) loss or expense arising from or attributable to: (a) debt, insolvency, business or commercial failure; (b) the repossession of any property; or © Your non - compliance with a contract, license or permit; 4) loss or expense arising from or due to liability assumed by You under any contract.

We do not cover: 1) loss or expense recoverable under any other insurance or through an employer; 2) loss or expense arising from or attributable to: a) dishonest or criminal acts committed or attempted by You; b) alleged violation of the laws of the country You are visiting, unless We determine such allegations to be fraudulent, or c) failure to maintain required documents or visas; 3) loss or expense arising from or attributable to: a) debt, insolvency, business or commercial failure; b) the repossession of any property; or c) Your non - compliance with a contract, license or permit; 4) loss or expense arising from or due to liability assumed by You under any contract.

2) loss or expense arising from or attributable to: a) dishonest or criminal acts committed or attempted by You; b) alleged violation of the laws of the country You are visiting, unless We determine such allegations to be fraudulent, or c) failure to maintain required documents or visas;

You agree not to do any of the following: (A) post or transmit any libelous, defamatory, indecent, obscene, fraudulent, deceptive, abusive or pornographic message, data, image, content or program; (B) post or transmit any message, data, image, content or program that would violate any property rights of others; (C) use the Services to threaten, harass, or otherwise violate the legal rights (including rights of privacy and publicity) of others; (D) upload or download files that contain software, marks, logos, data, images, content or other material protected by intellectual property laws, rights of privacy or publicity, or any other applicable law, unless you own or control the rights to such files or material or have received all necessary consents; (E) upload files that contain a virus or corrupted data; (F) falsify the source or origin of software or other material contained in a file that you upload to the Services; (G) falsely purport to be an employee or agent of Gigaom; (H) act, in your use of the Services, in a manner that is contrary to applicable law or regulation; or (I) circumvent, disable or otherwise interfere with security - related features of the Services or features that prevent or restrict use or copying of any Content or enforce limitations on use of the Services or the Content.

79 DOS 99 Matter of DOS v. Pagano - disclosure of agency relationships; failure to appear at hearing; proper business practices; unauthorized practice of law; unearned commissions; vicarious liability; fraudulent practice; jurisdiction; ex parte hearing may proceed upon proof of proper service; DOS has jurisdiction after expiration of respondents» licenses as acts of misconduct occurred and the proceedings were commenced while the respondents were licensed; licensee fails to timely provide seller client with agency disclosure form prior to entering into listing agreement and fails to timely provide agency disclosure form to buyer upon first substantive contact; broker fails to make it clear for which party he is acting; broker violates 19 NYCRR 175.24 by using exclusive right to sell listing agreement without mandatory definitions of «exclusive right to sell» and «exclusive agency»; broker breaches fiduciary duties to seller clients by misleading them as to buyer's ability to financially consummate the transaction; broker breaches his fiduciary duty to seller by referring seller to the attorney who represented the buyers when he knew or should have known such attorney could not properly protect seller's interests; improper for broker to use listing agreements providing for broker to retain one half of any deposit if forfeited by buyer as such forfeiture clause could, by its terms, allow broker to retain part of the deposit when broker did not earn a commission; broker must conduct business under name as it appears on license; broker engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in preparing contracts for purchase and sale of real estate which did not contain a clause making it subject to the approval of the parties» attorneys and were not a form recommended by a joint bar / real estate board committee; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using sales contract which purported to change the terms of the listing agreement to include a higher commission; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using contracts of sale which were unclear, ambiguous, vague and incomplete; broker failed to amend purchase agreement to reflect amendment to increase deposit amount; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in back - dating purchase agreements; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in participating in scheme to have seller hold undisclosed second mortgage and to mislead first mortgagee about the purchaser's financial ability to purchase; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness by claiming unearned commission and filing affidavit of entitlement for unearned commission; DOS fails to establish by substantial evidence that respondent acted as undisclosed dual agent; corporate broker bound by the knowledge acquired by and is responsible for acts committed by its licensees within the actual or apparent scope of their authority; corporate and individual brokers» licenses revoked, no action taken on application for renewal until proof of payment of sum of $ 2,000.00 plus interests for deposits unlawfully retained