Sentences with phrase «such god exists»

if such a God exists (the one you are arguing about) would he MAKE death instantaneous??? sheesh...

If she is, indeed, like me then she has come to a crossroad, a place of decision: be true to who God made her to be (if indeed such a God exists) or continue to walk the walk and talk the talk outwardly, knowing the security of fellowship and belonging but withering and eventually dying inside.

When you tell a child to believe in a god when you don't even have proof that such a god exists, you are lying to that child.

Because God can be relegated to remote times and places and to ultimate causes, we would have to know a great deal more about the universe than we do now to be sure that no such God exists.»

If such a God exists, it seems eminently more reasonable to assume the latter.

2011judgment — If you truly believed such a God exists why would you worship such a psychopath?

To me such a God exists because of the purpose I believe for us being her on this earth to live is to test us in following the teachings and that mastering those teachings brings about a state of happinessand greator personal development.

Not exact matches

If godliness is defined as the state of having freed one's soul from karmas and the attainment of enlightenment and a God as one who exists in such a state, then those who have achieved such a state can be termed gods.

M is such that M would being about belief if God does exist, and M would bring about unbelief if God does not exist.

Furthermore, you should ask why such horrid diseases exist at all, and why god doesn't simply do away with them.

Quite a stretch there, devin, to go from «we can't understand god» to your claimed belief that such a being exists.

Tell me why would a loving God allow such a civilization to exist and spread its evil?

Paul and the Romans made the rumor of a crucifixion into a savior story by usurping other existing traditions, such as the Mithraic virgin birth, and death of the sun god Mithra.

You can seek God, without having a clue that there's such a thing as christianity that exists.

I convinced myself that there was no God, but I was sad that such a God of love did not exist.»

You really need to get off your fixation on the physical as we are speaking about the Kingdom of God not this earth where we exist for such a short moment of eternity that one will hardly notice.

No one ever existed by the name of Jesus in human history, but hinduism, fabrication of hindu's, criminals of hinduism, racism to hind, fool humanity in to gentile ism, slavery of other human as their god, such as King's and their hindu criminal Prophets, criminal fortune tellers, profession of writers of book of hindu Mithraism, savior ism, called Bile.

I am happy that the writer had the choices that she did... She is also free to decide whether or not she is a Catholic... She however, took an available medication for a health problem... most Catholic facilities recognize such health problems and allow for that treatment... I am completly puzzled, though, that she would not want other Catholics to be able to choose differently than she did... for those people who wish to use contraceptive services and medication, options are open to them... I am not Catholic, did not grow up in a faith based family, and don't know whether a God exists or not... However, to leave a relgious group with no option but to contradict its own tenets is an attempt by those who don't believe in those tenents to mock them, certainly, but more to erode them... this seems the aim of many and when those folks operate from inside the government... that intrusion is an overreach of the govenrment...

LOL: The Christian perspective is that God does indeed exist, and because of that, all human beings (including the ones who deny His very existence) are still endowed with some of the gifts He's given us — such as some capacity to reason, create, and love, though all imperfectly.

God, if he existed at all, would not allow such egotistical people such as you to spread his «word» it would be bad for business.

Considering the fact that no one can show any such «god» to exist, relying on «his justice» is a fools errand.

Either they necessitate a deceptive «God», e.g. creating starlight «in transit» which means that for some light the star that supposedly sent said light would never have actually existed, or they would cause effect that should be evident but are not, e.g. temporarily fast starlight would effectively cook many things, such as life on earth, if the required light (and attendant gamma radiation) were compressed into a significantly shorter time frame (think of the radiation from the apparent 13 billion years of the universe arriving at the same time, or even over a 1000 years).

You ASSUME no such being as God exist because you ASSUME Him to be subject to the same laws of nature of this universe in which we exist.

I don't hate God or wish to prove him wrong there just isn't any evidence to prove one such as he exist.

If god exists, it actually raises more questions than it answers (where did he come from, why does he cause such pain and suffering, why did he create us, etc).

2) The god (s) frequently claimed to exist, as depicted in the various holy books, reflect logical and moral inconsistencies such that they deserve neither deference nor respect.

When you can prove God exists, then you will have my ear, until such time I will continue to believe you are a fool for devoting your life to something for which there is no evidence.

When you all can prove that God don't exist, then you will have my ear, until such time seek GOD he is calling you and stop being fools.

@Kenrick Benjamin: «When you all can prove that God don't exist, then you will have my ear, until such time seek GOD he is calling you and stop being fools.»

There are facts - such as fulfilled Biblical prophecies and the effects in people's lives when they follow God - that indicate that God does exist.

1) A real God never existed, and as such, religion needs to be abandoned.

When faced with a multitude of questions — such as why is there no evidence God exists?

In Santa we trust - Here it is, God who is eternal and the first, came to be when they were only 3 things that existed, Je, ho, vah, I will call them elements for the sake of such.

Regarding the notion of a «perfect God» judging — well, you may believe such exists, I do not.

Such as the fact that god, a soul, an afterlife can't be shown to exist - kind of like your ability to think logically or your ability to stop lying!

He then went on to acknowledge that «there are other powers which surround matter and pervade it,» but nothing is opposed to God to such an extent that it can obviate God's intentions: «if anything did manage to set itself up against God, it would cease to exist.

Because he has presented no evidence, no such evidence must exist, therefore his god must not exist.

a) if there is life after death in the way I used to envision it, b) whether God exists in an objective, verifiable sense (don't know how I'd ever prove such an ephemeral, numinous ideal in words anyway) c) whether I or anyone else is «saved.»

I don't believe a god or gods exist because there is no evidence to support such a claim.

Maybe if you'd simply admit that you don't have any true knowledge of this god and only believe it exists there wouldn't be such a problem.

I do not believe in a god, but if such a being exists, I will face him with my integrity intact.

War is a particular demonstration of the power of sin in the world and a defiance of the righteousness of God as revealed in Jesus Christ and him crucified» Yet the conference accepted the idea that criteria exist by which some wars can be regarded as just: to defend international law, or to vindicate «an essential Christian principle» such as the defense of «victims of wanton aggression.»

If such evidence exists, it doesn't explain why there are still so many atheists and so many polytheists and so many believers in other incompatible gods.

Until such time as you can show this god of yours exists, you can not claim I am a sinner.

Actually, Mary, I did prove that a god with the absurd characteristics described by Christian claptrap such as your own does not exist.

God addresses to the Church the question whether it has the courage to undertake an apostolic offensive into such a future and consequently the necessary courage to show itself to the world sincerely, in such a form that no one can have the impression that the Church only exists as a mere survival from earlier times because it has not yet had time to die.

If you claim your god has control and is not using such control to alleviate suffering, then I have no reason to believe that if it actually exists in the manner that your brand of Christianity holds, that it is not immoral beyond any kind of cruelty that man has come up with.

They think that because they have such outstanding intellectual capabilities, they must be able to determine whether or not God exists.

But even if such a mind did exist, he continued, it would not deserve the designation «God» because its own values would necessarily conflict with ours.

God could make himself as obvious as gravity (since he made gravity as obvious as he made gravity), but he doesn't, and so there's no way to determine whether or not god exist and we continue to debate him without any solid proof or meaningful evidence (like we see in biology and chemistry and sucGod could make himself as obvious as gravity (since he made gravity as obvious as he made gravity), but he doesn't, and so there's no way to determine whether or not god exist and we continue to debate him without any solid proof or meaningful evidence (like we see in biology and chemistry and sucgod exist and we continue to debate him without any solid proof or meaningful evidence (like we see in biology and chemistry and such).