It is important, they say, that in every congregation
such homosexual persons should find fellow - Christians who sensitively provide friendship and understanding.
Not exact matches
Father John Harvey states (in The
Homosexual Person: New Thinking in Pastoral Care) that some
homosexuals may be victims of truly compulsive behavior and as
such deserve our special sympathy and understanding; but even these unfortunate individuals, he notes, may exercise the choice to seek help.
Far from being an indicator of social acceptance of homosexuality, a movie
such as The Birdcage - sanitized of what
homosexuals actually do with their plumbing, and of grim specters
such as AIDS - is a very traditional instance of
people finding
homosexual behavior, especially in its more flamboyant cross-dressing variations, ludicrously funny.
One suggestion recommends, «not using phrases
such as «gay», «lesbian» or «
homosexual» to define a
person's identity,» in order to «take every aspect of the
person into consideration.»
It is precisely
such a perspective that is needed in current debates on homosexuality and the issue of civil unions for
homosexual persons.
Homosexual persons have, of course, legitimate rights
such as the right to work and the right to be treated fairly.
Examples of
such oppressed groups are the Jews, aboriginal
peoples the world over,
homosexuals and women.
(NB: In this context, «
homosexual» means someone with dominantly same - sex desires, while «gay» refers to a
person whose self - identity is determined by
such desires.)
While psychiatrists will, of course, be available to help
people with a
homosexual orientation if they want
such help, the APA's decision is a clear disclaimer of responsibility for changing
homosexual persons who are not troubled by their orientation and whose behavior is not socially irresponsible.
But the
person who insists she is a Catholic, but finds the Trinity «patriarchal and oppressive», Christ's Sacrifice on the Cross «just so bloodthirsty», lesbian and
homosexual relationships «a lifestyle to be celebrated», and the Pope «a ridiculous figure».........
such a
person's contribution to dialogue lacks integrity and meaning Pro's And Con's Of The Ghetto Culture Of course, the reasons for wanting to emphasise one's Catholicism are pretty obvious: it gives status, enlarges one's importance, and is, at present, very fashionable.
Because certain church spokespeople have contributed to the formation of an environment that is prejudicial to
homosexual people, declares the WSCC document, «the Church is seriously obliged to work toward the uprooting of
such prejudice.»
Here's another, scarcely less oratorical in character, from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith: the title of this document (another wonderful example of Vatican bogus academic language when what is needed is a competent journalist used to writing informative headlines) is «Considerations regarding proposals to give legal recognition to unions between
homosexual persons» (2003): The Church's teaching on marriage and on the complementarity of the sexes reiterates a truth that is evident to right reason and recognised as
such by all the major cultures of the world.
Then
such persons should seek to sublimate their
homosexual desires and not act upon them.
If the
homosexual can change his or her sexual orientation,
such a
person should seek to change.
We know from historical records that there were many «gay» and «
homosexual»
people at the time (though they didn't go by
such terms).
Another idea was to limit the drug to specific populations who are at the very highest risk,
such as
homosexual people who use intravenous drugs, but the FDA adopted a vaguer category encapsulating anyone at high risk of contracting HIV.
Not only can you search
people by location and sex, but you can also avail of dating options
such as bisexual,
homosexual, straight and interracial dating.
This is the case, because there are chat lines available for specific groups of
people,
such as
homosexual, African Americans and even Latinos.
Even so, he starts making about - face statements
such as, «I was a heterosexual
person with a
homosexual problem.»
The author went on to state, «While I don't hate
such people [
homosexuals] as a
person, I do have to hate their unholy and unnatural lifestyle choice.
Article 10 (1)(d) of Council Directive 2004 / 83 / EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third - country nationals or Stateless
persons as refugees or as
persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted must be interpreted as meaning that the existence of criminal laws,
such as those at issue in each of the cases in the main proceedings, which specifically target
homosexuals, supports the finding that those
persons must be regarded as forming a particular social group.
The UNHCR Guidance Note also recognizes «that criminal sanctions for
homosexual activity also impede the access of LGBT
persons to State protection,» and that
such a situation could support a claim that the State condones or tolerates persecution of sexual minorities, or that the State is unable to offer any state protection.
There was a fundamental difference between, on the one hand, offering something lawful to which a
person was not automatically entitled in law (
such as the acceptance of pleas to fewer or lesser offences with a consequent reduction in sentence or assistance towards repatriation) and, on the other hand, threatening something unlawful against which the
person would normally have legal protection (
such as an irremediably unlawful sentence or, as in the Cobb case,
homosexual rape).
For example, bisexual
people are often categorized as «
homosexual» in
such studies, and then when they enter a heterosexual relationship, it is considered a successful «conversion.»