Not exact matches
Not only is it impossible to anticipate in
such a code every possible variable or potential dilemma, but always «it is possible to satisfy the letter of the law while still committing an act that most reasonable
people would consider unethical or
immoral.»
And every decent
person knows in their heart of hearts that
such discrimination is
immoral.
Sex between unmarried adults might be inside that gray area between the ideal and the
immoral if, first, no one's marriage is being violated by either party; second, if it is a union of love and caring, not just a union of convenience and desire; third, if sex is shared only after other things have been shared, other things
such as time, values, friendship, communication and a sense of deep trust and emotional responsibility; fourth, if it is both loving and discreet, private, shielded from those who would not or could not understand; if it is valued as a bond between the two
people involved and between them alone, never violating the sacredness of the exclusive quality of that moment.
11 But now I have written to you not to keep company with anyone named a brother, who is sexually
immoral, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner — not even to eat with
such a
person.
«For of this you can be sure: No
immoral, impure or greedy
person,
such a
person is an idolater - has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God» — Ephesians 5:5
Having made these
people to live in
such conditions, is
immoral and unethical.
Or other activities
such as the prisons acts in Iraq or others... Killing a man in a honest way no problem but they were the other hatred and
immoral treatments of insults...
People will never forget the things been done to them in hatred under the term of fighting terror...!
Other matters that would be repugnant to most
people,
such as gross misrepresentation of facts important to health and safety, or public displays of vicious and
immoral conduct, would also normally be prohibited by law.
In those days, sinners fell into five basic categories:
people who did dirty things for a living (
such as pig farmers and tax collectors),
people who did
immoral things (
such as liars and adulterers),
people who did not keep the law up to the standards of the religious authorities (
such as you and me), Samaritans and gentiles.
In addition to these crazy and
immoral laws, there are plenty of examples of God's irrationality by his direct killing of many
people for reasons that defy any rational explanation
such as killing children who make fun of bald
people, and the killing of a man who tried to keep the ark of God from falling during transport.
If one is fair, please at least acknowledge the millions of other
peoples of white, Christian and Jewish descent who were vehemently opposed to these
immoral issues and set about (that is ACTION, not cheap lip service) putting
such practices to an end.
You would look upon
such a
person with disgust and contempt and consider them incredibly
immoral.
This has institutionalised «harm reduction» in the laws of the state, and has also made these services available to categories of
people,
such as prisoners, sex workers and vagrants, who have been otherwise regarded as
immoral, deviant and «counter-revolutionary».
Moral Hazard is generally referred to as the risk on the life of a
person due to the particular circumstances in which that life is placed; it could be simply due to the position (
such as a politician), or by virtue of a
person being involved in activities that are illegal or
immoral or unhealthy in nature.