Soon the idea [i.e., linking carbon emissions with natural disasters] was in all the media where
such junk science routinely finds a home: The Huffington Post, The Atlantic, blogs at The Washington Post.
What most frustrates climate sceptics is the persistence of
such junk science in the public and policy debates.
Not exact matches
We use
science in our daily lives and actual scientific proof for almost everything we do in life, but we accept an imaginary friend
such as God as the absolute truth and want to make everyone eat that
junk like it's the universal truth.
The case was
such an outrageous example of
junk science in the courtroom that it was the subject of several newspaper investigations, a major story in The New Yorker, and a PBS Frontline documentary.
This article is five screens full of
junk science, fear mongering, and plainly bizarre advice
such as the quote above.
Some advocates have criticized
such studies as
junk science.
He has spoken often for DDP, on
such topics as global warming in courts, the litigation epidemic, that litigation and
junk science helped bring down the World Trade Center, and that great thinkers are almost entirely created via home schooling.
Often justified largely on the basis of
junk science they have come up with
such wonderful policy prescriptions as using only unreliable sources of energy because they are «sustainable,» keeping natural resources in the ground rather than using them to meet human needs, having government tell manufacturers what requirements their products must meet to use less energy rather than encouraging manufacturers to meet the needs of their customers, all in the name of «energy efficiency,» substituting government dictates for market solutions on any issue related to energy use, and teaching school children
junk science that happens to meet «environmentalists» ideological beliefs in hopes of perpetuating these beliefs to future generations even though they do not conform to the scientific method, the basis of
science.
Scientific predictions are only as good as the
science behind them, if you put
junk data in you get
junk results, hardly scientific at all, it's a bogus belief system that calls itself
science and like all
such systems it requires ardent blind followers to keep the fires of the faith burning without ever questioning anything no matter how utterly absurd.
Such corrections are necessarily biased and definitely
junk science.
Yet they collude by embracing trendy, rigid, group hysteria inflamed, secular religions
such as this latest one, courtesy of paid advertising professionals flogging what is often unquestioned
junk science.
Both, he contends, are examples of
junk science, supported by intellectual elites who will later conveniently forget they signed on to
such craziness.
Then we have blatent
junk science being promoted
such as this: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/11/26/another-wuwt-tv-segment-engineer-and-aviation-pioneer-burt-rutan-on-why-he-doubts-global-warming/
You try what was seen in an award - winning essay suggestion from the 2008 «Roscoe Hogan Environmental Law Essay Contest,» that
such testimony may be ignored because it is unreliable
junk science funded by corporations that's irrelevant in the face of settled
science.
Great Hub, it is
such a pleasure to read REAL
science in this day and age of
junk science.
The recommendations in the Goudge Inquiry Report — into the conduct of disgraced former Ontario pathologist, Dr. Charles Smith — casting a dim view on the dogmatic acceptance and admissibility of «
junk science» theories,
such as «shaken baby» syndrome, are significant steps in the remedying past injustices and avoiding future ones.