Not exact matches
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday refused to hear a bid by major record
labels to revive copyright infringement
claims against video - sharing website Vimeo for hosting content that included songs by famed bands
such as the Beatles, the Jackson 5, and the Beach Boys without permission.
Just as with other nebulous meat and dairy
claims —
such as «grass - fed» and «cage - free» — what we think a
label means is typically a far cry from the truth.
Most truly spiritual people would thank him for sharing, and not give him
labels such as «obnoxious» — because you are doing the things you
claim to hate —
labeling to manipulate opinion and silence opposing viewpoints that are different from your own.
No, I don't KNOW that you haven't experienced what you
claim to have experienced, but I assign
such claims to the folder
labeled «unsubstantiated».
Couple of applicable pieces of scripture on the inappropriateness of
labeling someone «not a Christian» who
claims faith in Jesus Christ and especially who does not show specific violations of the requirements of
such faith:
Claiming to be not simply an accidental nineteenth - century invention but a timeless truth about human sexual nature, this framework puts on airs, deceiving those who adopt its
labels into believing that
such distinctions are worth far more than they really are.
In some cases, customers require specific certifications for the purpose of making
label claims,
such as «gluten - free,» «non-GMO,» «Kosher» or «Halal.»
Note that Canada and the U.S. have slightly different approaches to organic
labeling,
such as: Canada does not permit a «100 % Organic»
claim; the U.S. «Made with»
claim for products containing 70 - 95 % organic ingredients is treated as a percentage
claim in Canada (products must state «XX % organic ingredients»).
To ensure that survey findings could be attributed to the front - of - pack
labelling, mock food packages excluded information
such as the NIP, ingredients list and nutrition
claims, to prevent this information influencing survey responses.
Clean
label is a catch - all term for a panoply of
label claims such as «all natural», «minimally processed,» and «non-GMO,» that also lack legal definition.
Using date ingredients for caramel flavour can help you achieve clean and clear
label, with
claims such 100 % natural, refined sugar free, no artificial colours, reduced sugar, raw, vegan positioning your brand as healthy, consumer friendly and socially responsible.
As they contain only naturally occurring sugars, they are suitable for clean
label claims such as refined sugar free, low sugar and even no added sugar in certain formulations.
Colors may be
claimed as «natural,» but the FDA's long - standing position is that any ingredient added with the intent to color a food, even if the ingredient itself is natural, is an «artificial color» and may have to be
labeled as
such (21 CFR 101.22 (k)-RRB-.
They contribute to clean
label claims,
such as 100 % Natural, No Refined Sugar, No Added Sugar, Reduced Sugar etc..
Containing only naturally occurring sugars, dates as an ingredient can help develop a clean and clear
label with sugar related
claims such as: refined sugar free, no added sugar, reduced sugar and low sugar.
Including dates in finished products can contribute towards clean and clear
labels with
claims such as 100 % natural, refined sugar free, no added sugar, high fibre, raw, and can be reflected in shorter ingredient declaration which is what consumers are looking for.
There, consumers often think of clean
label as being synonymous to nothing artificial and more natural (aka «in natura») as well as other health
claims such as organic or toxin - free.
Deem a food made from oats that bears a «gluten - free»
claim in its
labeling to be misbranded if the
claim suggests that all
such foods are «gluten - free» or if 20 ppm or more gluten is present in the food.
Petaluma, Calif., December 11, 2017 — A new study from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) examines the flaws in single - trait
label claims, noting that no single
label meets the comprehensive requirements of the organic
label, while lack of clarity around
labels such as «natural» and «transitional» cause consumers further confusion.
Kerry said defining clean
label on a legislative level would only further confuse consumers already inundated with
claims and certifications
such as non-GMO, natural and organic.
For many reasons,
such as there being over 10 million hens kept in conventional cages, false and misleading
claims about egg -
labelling and many others, AFSA is concerned for the future of genuine free - range systems for raising poultry on farms.
Without industry standards and
labelling consistency,
such free - from
claims could become self - defeating.
Salt of the Earth
claimed that formulating meat substitutes using its Mediterranean Umami ingredient enables food manufacturers to meet hot demands
such as clean
label, plant - based, and rich in umami flavor, with a significant reduction of salt.
Unlike foods that
claim to be all - natural, foods
labeled «organic» have to go pass some very strict regulations to be
labeled as
such.
The new guidelines will require sun protection formula
labeling to have proven effectiveness against ultraviolet rays
such as UVA and UVB to
claim protection against skin cancers.
At past shareholder meetings, the Chair repeatedly defended promoting infant formula with strategies
such as logos on
labels claiming «protects» babies, despite knowing that babies fed on breastmilk substitutes are more likely to become sick than breastfed babies and, in conditions of poverty, more likely to die.
I told you how the dairy industry wants to change the «statements of identity» for milk and 17 other dairy products to allow non-nutritive sweeteners (
such as aspartame) in these products without the prominent front -
label «nutrient content
claims» currently required by FDA regulations — phrases like «reduced sugar» or «reduced calorie.»
That petition, if granted, would allow the use of non-caloric sweeteners in these dairy products without any front -
label nutrient content
claim (
such as «reduced sugar» or «reduced calorie») presently required by FDA regulations.
Without the front -
label nutrient content
claims currently required for artificially sweetened milk, consumers have no reason to check ingredient listings for what they already assume: that «milk» does not normally contain non-nutritive sweeteners
such as aspartame or acesulfame - potassium.
In late February, I alerted you to an FDA citizen petition which would allow the dairy industry to add non-nutritive sweeteners (
such as aspartame) to milk and 17 other dairy products without the prominent front -
label «nutrient content
claims»... [Continue reading]
put health and nutrition
claims on
labels (unless on a small list of permitted
claims) or use other idealising text or images on infant formula (
such as hearts, shields, animals)(RG 17 / GN 32).
«Let's not forget that the existing ban on
such text and images on infant formula
labels is routinely flouted by companies in many Member States, with images
such as shields, polar bears and unauthorised health
claims appearing.
Nestlé currently
labels its infant formula around the world with idealising
claims such as it is the «natural start» and «protects» babies.
These prohibit the use of idealising
claims such as those Nestlé puts on
labels and other strategies it uses,
such as advertising of brand names, seeking direct and indirect contact with pregnant women and mothers of infants and young children and targeting of health workers.
The fact that the USDA stands by its
claim that Pink Slime is «beef» and products do «not» need to be
labelled as
such, is an attempt to continue making fools out of us.
The fact that the USDA stands by its
claim that Pink Slime is «beef» and products do need to be
labelled as
such, is an attempt to continue making fools out of us.
In what appears to be a clear response to the opposition NPP's
claims that he is incompetent, the President also indicated that the party has no right to
label him as
such when it is unable to give full account of a simple redenomination exercise.
The oversight of dietary supplements is loose: FDA regulations allow for several different types of efficacy
claims to be made on
labels, including fairly robust significant scientific agreement
claims that the nutrient in question has a direct effect on a specific disease, but also so - called qualified health
claims, where phrases
such as some evidence suggests that are added.
The rules will permit food processors to make new
claims on their
labels,
such as «low in trans fat» or «low in cholesterol - raising fat.»
In
such cases, FDA allows health
claims based on scientific data that are strong and building — but only as long as product
labels «qualify» those purported benefits — that is, describe limitations of the data linking food and benefit.
In this paper, the author
claimed that added sugar represents
such a great danger to human health that products who contain it should carry the same warning
labels as alcohol.
Products that contain these sweeteners will often have
claims on their
labels,
such as, «contains no refined sugar» or «refined sugar - free.»
MTS Nutrition Machine Whey has set the new standard for whey protein combining ground - breaking flavor systems
such as Cookies & Cream and Red Velvet Cake with 3rd party verified
label claims testing.
These products are not always clearly
labeled and some are even
labeled with misleading
claims such as «natural ingredients.»
As with all dietary supplements, in the United States inappropriate
label health
claims such as preventing or treating disease are opposed by the FDA and deceptive advertisements by the Federal Trade Commission.
Non-Profit Debt Consolidation There are many debt consolidation companies that
claim to be non-profit, but it is important to distinguish exactly what that
label means in
such a context.
Many eyewear insiders
claim the high markup of name - brand frames is attributed in part to a single company that owns and operates under the guise of
such popular designer
labels as Chanel, Prada, Ray - Ban, Oliver Peoples and Dolce & Gabbana.
The FPLA contains additional regulations designed to prevent unfair or deceptive packaging and
labeling, and to help make it possible for consumers to make value comparisons between products The FDA also reviews specific
claims on pet food,
such as «maintains urinary tract health,» «low magnesium,» and «hairball control.»
Guarantees for other nutrients may be required to support
claims made in
labeling (
such as «High in calcium and vitamin A»), and manufacturers may include voluntary guarantees for other nutrients.
Moreover, the website and
label make a big deal over the use of «non-GMO oats,» but no
such claim is made for the main proteins, corn and soy.