But it has been suggested in the past that getting out the activists for
such large constituencies has proved difficult.
Despite the claims of moderate Republicans and the warnings of liberal journalists, it is hard to see how Republicans could ignore
such a large constituency.
To exclude
such a large constituency from a promising new regulatory approach would be a lost opportunity.
Not exact matches
That ever - shrinking but always vocal
constituency within the Labour party that is impressed by
such a show of fundraising largesse would be well advised to stop for a moment, consider what tactics brought a dip in our membership, a loss of intellectual dexterity in power, & loss of trust & support among the wider public, & to not be jellylegged by the implied promises of favour from vested interests that
such large donations are supposed to signify.
In
constituencies where there are
large amounts of 2010 Lib Dem «don't knows» —
such as these — and there are not complications
such as a very high level of UKIP support (who had little or no 2010 support and so distorts the UKIP figure) we agree with this strategy — so let's do just what ICM suggest — and see just what would have happened had ICM used their usual methodology: