Not exact matches
If by God is meant the Ground of Being, the Essence of Being, the Absolute, the Weltgeist, and all similar expressions, the reply is still No, for according to Schweitzer
such terms «denote nothing actual, but something conceived in abstractions which for that reason is also absolutely
meaningless» (The Philosophy of Civilization [Macmillan, 1949], p. 304).
And that is much more useful than David simply providing a new definition for two reasons: he's seeking not necessarily to redefine, but to challenge already existing inconsistencies between our use of the words and how people actually function, AND because
such terms are given their meaning collectively so redefining it alone would be
meaningless because it wouldn't draw on people's real experience with their beliefs and views of the labels.
All
such phrases are, strictly,
meaningless except in
terms of some system of notions or concepts.
Green is now a
meaningless term because we have debased it to
such an extent by calling everything green.
The fact this is seemingly not fully recognized — or here integrated — by Curry goes to the same reason Curry does not recognize why the so called «pause» is a fiction, why the «slowing» of the «rate» of increase in average ambient global land and ocean surface air temperatures over a shorter
term period from the larger spike beyond the longer
term mean of the 90s is also
meaningless in
terms of the basic issue, and why the average ambient increase in global air temperatures over
such a short
term is by far the least important empirical indicia of the issue.