Sentences with phrase «such money transfers»

What kinds of financial institutions can be the passive side of such money transfer?

Not exact matches

J.P. Morgan (jpm) and many of its competitors have invested millions of dollars in the technology in hopes that it can be adapted to simplify and lower the costs of processes such as securities settlement, loan trading and international money transfers.

Meanwhile, bitcoin still has defenders such as Jeremy Allaire, a successful entrepreneur who raised over $ 60 million for his startup, Circle, a money transfer service for consumers using bitcoin behind the scenes.

Blockstream is looking to apply the technology to a range of activities, such as international money transfers.

Digital currencies such as Bitcoin are making money transfer more affordable and seamless.

Some may accept credit card payments, wire transfers, postal money orders, or other forms of payment (such as another virtual currency), in exchange for Ether or other virtual currencies.

For example, in the Philippines the growing population of overseas workers sending money back home has lead to the rise of financial technology (fintech) apps that offer a variety of new, low - cost services such as remittance payments, transfers, and lending that were otherwise expensive and dominated by a few groups.

Thankfully, global technology offers a solution in the form of online money transfer services, such as Xoom.

The contract stipulates that all monies transferred to GSR will be used for obtaining and processing the data for the project — «to further develop, add to, refine and supplement GS psychometric scoring algorithms, databases and scores» — and none of the money paid Kogan should be spent on other business purposes, such as salaries or office space «unless otherwise approved by SCL».

In the case of payments, custodians of money, such as banks and governments, will lay the initial groundwork and plumbing for value transfer.

The group has begun to use cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoins as it looks for anonymous and untraceable ways to transfer money.

Due to its anonymity and untraceabilitiy, it is used for criminal activities such as laundering money, buying and selling illegal goods and services and transferring money to support criminal or terror activities.

We'll explore how social media firms such as Facebook and Snapchat are trying to turn their text messaging services into money transfer services, and why they're struggling to take off.

This can in turn bring over more practical applications via the blockchain, such as transferring stocks, sums of money, or ownership of various assets.

Wells Fargo in PA refuses to transfer money from my checking account to a digital currency exchange such as ARBA.

If both parties charge 1.5 % for buying and selling the digital currency then they have saved a fortune in fees versus traditional money transfer services that can charge upwards of 8 %, 9 %, or more, for such transactions.

Such buying should push up asset prices, keeping the amount of money in the financial system the same (being simply transferred from buyers to sellers).

Also identified in the document are potential use cases for cryptocurrencies, such as a more portable, fungible, divisible store of value; trading that can result in capital gains or loss; payments for goods and services; and an alternative route to circumvent high transaction fees to transfer money for domestic or international purposes.

Cash advances, ATM transactions, Convenience checks, Fees charged by us (for example, annual fees, interest, and related service charges), Payments made for prepaid and reloadable cards such as certain gift cards, Visa Buxx ®, and similar cards, Payments made for payment instruments that can readily be converted to cash (for example, travelers checks, money orders, wire transfers, and similar products or services).

Digital currency or digital money is an Internet - based medium of exchange distinct from physical (such as banknotes and coins) that exhibits properties similar to physical currencies, but allows for instantaneous transactions and borderless transfer - of - ownership.

Additionally, FinCEN claimed regulation over American entities that manage bitcoins in a payment processor setting or as an exchanger: «In addition, a person is an exchanger and a money transmitter if the person accepts such de-centralized convertible virtual currency from one person and transmits it to another person as part of the acceptance and transfer of currency, funds, or other value that substitutes for currency.»

The most convenient are the ones that allow users to transfer fiat money directly to their debit cards, such as Coinbase and GDAX, Kraken and CEX - IO.

In a bid to make the platform more flexible and convenient for traders across the globe, the YesOption broker allows its customers to deposit money into and withdraw from their trading accounts using an array of payment processors, such as Neteller, Credit Cards, Western Union and Wire transfer.

On such platforms you can find someone who is interested in selling BTC for cash and then schedule a meeting with them or agree on some other method to transfer money.

In addition, Innovative Dining Group may disclose personally identifiable information about you to other companies or individuals in the following circumstances: - Innovative Dining Group utilizes third party service providers to provide products, services or functions on IDG's behalf (such as sending emails or processing credit cards or fulfilling orders placed online) and asks these service providers to agree to maintain the confidentiality of your personally identifiable information and not to use your personally identifiable information for any reason except to carry out the purpose (s) for which we retained them; - Innovative Dining Group needs to protect its legal rights (e.g., if Innovative Dining Group is trying to collect money you owe); - Innovative Dining Group must comply with applicable laws, regulations or legal or regulatory processes; - Innovative Dining Group has reason to believe that someone may be causing injury to someone or interfering with - In connection with a sale, merger, transfer, exchange or other disposition of all or a portion of the business conducted by the web site.

And its not like Wenger bought such poor players by choice, thats what his money could afford him, think about it... not long ago, a mere 16 million euros that was used in the acquisition of carzola was our record transfer fee when other teams bought players for fees in excess of 30 mil every season!

With transfer fees continually on the rise and this summer seeing some crazy prices paid for players, such as the signing of rumoured Arsenal transfer target Gonzalo Higuain by Italian champions Juventus and the crazy money set to be shelled out by Manchester United for their former youth star Paul Pogba, is this why Arsenal have made just one big transfer so far?

With such silly money being reported just who could even consider signing the Argentine and afford to pay a supposed # 200 million transfer fee and # 300m wage packet.

Clubs such as Chelsea were average (at best) before their money wielding saviour came galloping along, so why not transform your club into the next global super power buy throwing all your money into the transfer kitty?

It strikes me that Wenger is obsessed with finding and developing another Tierry Henry so that he can sit back and bask in the glory of such a find, however football has changed and the method and talent aquisition skills he introduced are mainly the reason for this, the only thing that really talks in the transfer market now is money and Wenger just WONT spend.

It's hard to imagine such a transfer happening in January, especially considering the Parisians have just spent decent money on Julian Draxler.

The most infuriating thing is if Wenger knew we had such a poor transfer budget why did he spend it on a striker, it would have been far more beneficial to use the money on a world class cb or cdm.

I don't know what is so difficult in convincing a player and putting up the cash to meet the proper valuation unless your not willing to... 1) We're in one of the great football city in Europe 2) We're one of the top clubs in London and arguably play the most beautiful football 3) We have loads of cash and true not all of it is for transfers but with the new tv deal, our on going & new commercial deals we have more money than most 4) We have players such as Ozil, Sanchez, Bellerin» Ramsey & Cech I mean if I'm a player it would be a pretty attractive prospect 5) We have a great stadium

4) At this stage of the transfer window can a deal be made for such a player and if so will Arsenal show some willingness to complete a deal quickly and part ways with the a more than likely big amount of money?

We should soon find out, as Madrid apparently need the money to fund their own transfer pursuits this summer, such as a world record move for the young Monaco striker Kylian Mbappe.

The 20 - year - old, also reported to be a transfer target for big names such as Chelsea, Manchester United and Manchester City, is considering his future at Anfield after rejecting a big - money contract offer from the Reds in recent times.

Big money moves for players such as Oscar have become a regular feature of this transfer window and the last, so much so that the footballing culture in China is rapidly growing.

All of Wenger's disastrous plans when it comes to transfers, both incoming and outgoing, are coming home to roost... why would anyone pay a significant fee for a player that was hardly used, is overpaid and has a spotty injury record; not to mention the fact that Wenger nickels & dimes everyone when it comes to transfers so it only makes sense that other teams would do likewise when dealing with us... the fact is I wouldn't be surprised if Wenger does this so that players won't be moved thereby giving him a ready - made excuse not to spend more money on transfers; there's a reason why the latest headlines regarding Arsenal transfers seem to suggest that we aren't bringing anyone in until some players are sold or moved elsewhere on loan... we know this club knows how to utilize press coverage to further their questionable agendas, it's the very reason why the Sanchez situation has become such a nightmare

Don't you know that Dortmund and Sporting would be crazy to not replace players of such quality with the huge amount of money they'd get from these transfers?

In my opinion, although the price does seem a little high, who are we to complain about Wenger spending such amount of money, when all we wanted to see what a bit of ambition from Arsenal in the transfer market.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

There have been some injury problems at crucial times in the transfer market for the Germany international attacking star and it was also being reported that his Bundesliga club were asking for a ridiculous amount of money for such a young player.

Other, GOOD, managers, if they had no quality players in such and such a position, would visit the transfer market and spend some effing money.

Sevilla has been extremely successful in the past decade or so, with a number of big name players coming in and leaving on big - money transfers, with players such as Dani Alves and Jesus Navas playing on the 2006 and 2007 UEFA Cup winning teams.

I cant understand some fans how can you say a player like villa cud not do a job at arsenal he is a world class finisher something we do nt hav at the moment as much as henry is a god at the emirates lets face it last yr he cudnt give us no more than 15 mins a game the pace had left him plus he iz now 35 david villa to me regardless his age is one of the most prolific strikers out there like tola said look at raul villa is that type of player theu might lose pace but neva lose the knack of scoring goals wenger bring him in and another thing barca as a big club shud be ashame of themselves still owing arsenal money of those transfers for such a big club arsenal shud be going in for more players than jus david villa

This transfer window has seen the big clubs spend huge money on names such as Alexis Sanchez, Cesc Fabregas and Diego Costa.

While some teams have spent big money to acquire quality players many teams may be looking for more value in the market as seen in previous seasons with players such as Michu for a measly # 2m, or Demba Ba who proved to be a hit at Tyneside after arriving on a free transfer.

Clearly a balance has to be struck between such expense and bringing in new players and while Tottenham seem bound to enter the transfer market at some point before the window closes, Levy recognises the importance of team spirit and the obvious fact that only one club can win the league title no matter how much money is splashed about.

Such money is of course not a problem for the Bavarians and without the slightest scruples, they will transfer it to the Eintracht's counter.

I'm not saying the boy's not good but if we are going to spend that sort of money then spend it on a striker that has proved he can score goals at any level in any league such as Higuain or Edin Zdeko.The algerian guy hasn't got time on his side to learn playing in the Premier league is all i'm saying and if he doesn't hit the ground running he could end up being another Balotteli.Spending 25m on a future free transfer is not doing the club any good at all.