Sentences with phrase «such name calling»

Refusing to name the problem can create the illusion that such name calling is acceptable.

Not exact matches

His niche is what he calls the pre-luxury market — the sweet spot between $ 300 and $ 600 — sharing shelf space with brands like Stuart Weitzman and Aquatalia, and once dominated by names such as Cole Haan and Donald J. Pliner, before they were sold and repositioned at a lower price point.

The study breaks up the harassment into two categories: less - severe harassment, such as name - calling and embarrassment.

The Asus Videophone Touch AiGuru SV1T, certified to work over Internet calling service Skype, has a long name for such a compact, easy - to - use device.

Corti, which is also the name of the company that developed the AI, runs in the background of emergency dispatch calls and uses speech recognition software and machine learning (ML) to pick up background cues, such as breathing patterns, that allow it to determine whether a person is suffering from cardiac arrest.

After having called North Korea's Kim names such as «little rocket man» in the past, Trump dubbed the Asian leader «honorable» and «open.»

Wolfe, Tinder's marketing vice president, alleged she was stripped of her co-founder title for being a 24 - year - old woman and called names such as a «whore» and «gold digger» by Mateen in front of Rad.

But initially at least Canada was seen as an additional complication to completion of the TPP, a «difficult» negotiating partner that brought its own baggage (such as a less than robust IPR regime, a traditional antipathy to the interests of the brand - name pharmaceutical manufacturers, a penchant for protecting so - called «cultural industries», and other trade issues that did not align with US interests) that might have resonated with some of the other TPP countries.

There are times when Christians have done horrible things in the name of Christ (Crusades), but it is their own Bible that calls them out for doing such things.

Would you care to explain how it is that «primitive sheep herders» as most of you love to derogatorily call them were able to in and of themselves write scripture such that the first two books Genesis & Exodus spell TORAH = LAW for every equidistant letter sequence of the 50th letter... and does the same backwards HAROT for Numbers & Deuteronomy, and the 3rd book that they're pointing towards Leviticus, every 7th letter (7 is God's number for perfection) spells YHWH = The name of God.

So, none of Romneys OUTRIGHT LIES and deceptions are evil, but our OUTSTANDING President, who has pulled us out of the BUSH recession and who has not lied once and has withstood the bogus name - calling and bogus acccusations from uninformed fools such as yourself has «values of the devil»??? Is that because he tells the truth and happens to be black?

No one ever existed by the name of Jesus in human history, but hinduism, fabrication of hindu's, criminals of hinduism, racism to hind, fool humanity in to gentile ism, slavery of other human as their god, such as King's and their hindu criminal Prophets, criminal fortune tellers, profession of writers of book of hindu Mithraism, savior ism, called Bile.

The name for such an internalization in modernity is pietism and the theological expression of that practice is called Protestant liberalism.

Always running away from such strong atheist arguments as name calling.

Everytime religious people post something about God or something out of their belief, there comes the Atheists storming it with their typical (hateful, profane, disrespectful but in - fairness articulate, itellect, scientific and logical) replies and name callings such as; «2000 years religious numbnuts», «oxymorons who keep asking of sky daddy's help», «idiots who was fooled by a magical being in the sky» and so on and so forth.

After a while being called names such as Uncle Tom, I remember something from the movie Ghost of Mississippi.

The problem is that through out history folks have called groups or elements of society that they do or did not like or agree with such names to de-humanize them.

Between the inaccuracies and the name - calling, such commenters sound like temperamental bullies on a playground - ignorant and immature.

Muslims call Him and worship Him by such names.

No other structure in the world can be called on to promise eternal salvation, and when such salvific claims are made in the name of some nation, race, social class, religion, or ideology, the church must fight such idolatry and blasphemy with all its means of persuasion, even to the point of martyrdom.

Many, if their worldview doesn't hold up under scrutiny and they feel the lack of support for something that is sacred to them, simply resort to repet.itious circular statements, name calling, diversion, red - herrings and such in order to justify it to themselves.

They must not join others in passionate condemnation (or support), in the name of fifty humanist motifs put forward by non-Christians, of such a politics conducted by a statesman who calls himself Christian.

Sane people can disagree about whether there ought to be a right to privacy, i.e., about whether it is logically a natural right and if so perhaps ought to be put into the Constitution via amendment, or about whether we (usually at state - level) should pass particular laws, such as ones that legalize gay - marriage, that factually expand what might be called privacy, but no sane U.S. Citizen, gay, straight, liberal, or conservative, should be left ignorant about the Constitution - wounding judicial usurpations done in the name of this right, more of which are planned to be done soon enough.

particularly when you call him names such as a bully?

Future comments such as the above two comments that amount to name - calling and personal attacks will be deleted.

«Why do the fait - hful have such a will to believe in Something, then call it a name they choose, having chosen Nothing»?

«Why do the faithful have such a will to believe in Something, then call it a name they choose, having chosen Nothing»?

I would not disrespect the name of our Saviour by calling such people «Christians» because a churchgoer is not necessarily a Christian.

Instead of name calling, I wish that Mr. Golijov had taken the opportunity to explain matters such as his editing decisions, why he chose to present Jesus as a symbol instead of a person, and perhaps what he expected the reactions of Christians to be to his work.

Instead of just calling people names and trying to insinuate or directly call believers ignorant why do the atheist not just accept that some can a different belief and that such belief should be able to be discussed in a kind respectful manner.

As the Pope says, «given such a grave situation, we need now more than ever to have the courage to look the truth in the eye and to call things by their proper names, without yielding to convenient compromises or to the temptation of self - deception.»

While Mary may have never been called an apostle, there was an apostle Junia (Rom 16:7 — the «of note among the apostles» that the ESV and other masculinist translations try to pigeonhole this into is a modern invention, not at all supported by biblical Greek; it was only even created when the masculinists finally had to admit that there was no manuscript evidence for transforming the name into «Junias», a masculine form), and there certainly was a Priscilla who «instructed Apollos» (Acts 18) and who was lauded by Paul as a «fellow worker» (Rom 16:3), as were numerous other women, such as Phoebe the deacon (Rom 16:1).

Would God say, «No, I am not going to listen to the prayers of such and such a group, because they wiped out nations in my name, because they build unjust social structures in my name, because they have gone to war in my name, because they don't call me by the «right» name, or simply because their doctrines do not quite correspond to who I am»?

It is so sad when Christians think it is okay to call other people such names.

When people go out in the name of Jesus to do such things, it makes me ashamed to be a Christian, or at least, ashamed to call myself a Christian.

I love to do treasure hunts by asking the Lord to highlight someone for me to be on the lookout for that day, such as a description of clothing, or a name and then I ask God to give me a word of knowledge about that person (such as Jesus «example with the woman at the well), and then as the conversation opens up, I can share the hope to which I «ve been called.

Such is also the justification given by Uncouth Swain who calls himself that because he hates the «arrogant rudeness» of atheists so much he changed his name to Uncouth.

As I understand my assignment for this conference, it is to represent a «methodological alternative in process theology» that has been given the name «rationalist» so as to facilitate its distinction from two other such alternatives, the empirical and speculative so - called.

The reverse process, from God to man, is called by such names as inspiration, revelation, or divine guidance.

Any response within such a basically religious awareness is prayer, whether called by that name or not.

Whitehead concludes: «For this reason, it would be better — so far as explanation is concerned — to abandon the term «distance» for this integral, and to call it by some such name as «impetus» suggestive of its physical import» (PR 507).

~ the music and visual entertainment that resembles more to something spewed out of the pits of hell, then something human beings would dream up, unless they are demon possessed... ~ the perversion of God's natural order and His intent for human kind, and justifying of it, calling it good, even using the Name of Christ to justify it, such as this article is clearly showing...

I. Absolute, true and mathematical time, of itself, and from its own nature, flows equably without relation to anything external, and by another name is called duration: relative, apparent, and common time, is some sensible and external (whether accurate or unequable) measure of duration by the means of motion, which is commonly used instead of true time; such as an hour, a day, a month, a year.

Some say there is such a thing but it should be called by another name, «public piety,» for example, rather than civil religion.

Our and «All» Creations ever being created by God, a name above all mannerisms to - be-named such as Jehova or Elohim or any other name calling and / or labellings other then the most simplstic and of God should all be stricken from all peoples» minds and doctrines and teachings!

On Heidegger's or Sartre's grounds, there could be no call for such an abstract thing as «justice,» certainly not in the name of «all that is holy.»

AHHHH is so fun to look at the comments from the Liberals... after any story they fill the pages with such creative names to call anyone who does «nt agree with them!

There were happy things and sad things, moments of unbearable fear and moments of lopsided comedy, tumbled together in such overwhelming immediacy I had neither space nor time to rise above them and call them by some generic name.

This thinker, whose name I shall not disclose, said that he was becoming more and more convinced that there was «something in the older metaphysical — he called them «ontological» — claims; at the moment he was much concerned, he said, to find a way of giving more than linguistic status to such propositions as «personal God», for it appeared to him that these statements somehow pointed to a truth about the universe, about the nature of things, that must be reckoned with in any honest description of the «way things are».

Such a moment ought to have a distinctive name; let us call it the Fullness of Time.