There is no need to include
such nonscientist representatives.
Not exact matches
Having congressional committees
such as the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology composed of
nonscientists is in itself quite ridiculous.
So try to use a more specific vocabulary and be aware that words
such as «creativity» may be understood differently by a scientist and a
nonscientist.
HAZU officials and others have warned that
such a council could be populated by
nonscientists while the decision - making role of faculty heads would be much reduced.
The authors note that Oreskes» methodology is further flawed because it also surveyed the opinions and writings of «
nonscientists who may write about climate, but are by no means experts on or even casually familiar with the science dealing with attribution — that is, attributing a specific climate effect (
such as a temperature increase) to a specific cause (
such as rising CO2 levels).»
The authors note that Oreskes» methodology is further flawed because it also surveyed the opinions and writings of «
nonscientists who may write about climate, but are by no means experts on or even casually familiar with the science dealing with attribution — that is, attributing a specific climate effect (
such as a temperature increase) to a specific cause (
such as rising CO
I appreciate your point — but the simple fact is, we can't teach science to
nonscientists,
such as humanities students, the same way we teach it to science students.