Sentences with phrase «such obvious lines»

Maybe the fact that she had such obvious lines of retaliation available to her explained her surprise.

Not exact matches

If the lines I have bracketed are allowed to stand, they might indicate that this promise belongs in the time of the exile, long after Micah; but the bracketed lines are such an obvious interruption to the flow of the poem that they must belong elsewhere.

How he manages to have characters speak lines in such arresting melodies enunciating such obvious truths and yet in a voice that seems to correspond exactly both to the personality of the character and to the situation of the moment is, of all Shakespeare's achievements, the most mysterious to explain and the hardest to specify.

Agreed, that is the problem right there - though at least the sniggerers can see the obvious absurdities of relativistic liberalism, and the blind alleys one will have to walk up if one were to try and mould a political system upon such lines.

Early exposition is hurried and obvious, where lines such as «But I said to myself, you're a lesbian, so...» and «We were like brothers!»

Opel Australia hopes the OPC models will provide a kick of between 10 and 30 per cent to the sales of each of its three model lines, figures commensurate with the sort of share obvious competitors such as the Volkswagen Polo GTI (Corsa) and Renault Megane RS (Astra) achieve.

I relied on the most obvious sources; the Humane Society of the United States, local shelter publications, and a few on - line sites devoted to such topics.

Hartz ® Dog Pads have many other uses besides the obvious such as lining a crate when hitting the road or just as a doormat to dry those wet paws when coming inside.

Some longtime fans may consider the changes — such as no timer or story co-op — to be a bridge too far, and to that line of thinking we must concede DR4's lack of difficulty feels like an obvious concession to woo a more casual audience.

Along those lines, has the following been tried (again, forgive if I'm asking something with an obvious answer published somewhere): 1) pick starting projection dates and subsequent run paths 2) example for (1): start 1980, run forward 5 years; start 1982, run forward 5 years; start 1984 (run to 1989) etc etc 3) at each start we proceed as with the 1979 directive; ie calibrate with several months of starting year data 4) thus the latest such (example) run where we could compare against actual data would be an initialization in 2008 and run forward for 5 years to 2013 5) the advantage of the above (and I recognize that there is a huge amount of work involved in crunching these simulations) is that we could see the starting temp and 5 year projections against the historical record for a number of overlapping segments.

Saying that you once accepted the IPCC line, but then noticed flaws, inconsistencies etc, which you decided to research, when its quite obvious from your previous writings you did no such thing is a form of corruption too.

My view is that in the face of very ignorant journalistic nonsense, too many scientists are failing to maintain their research objectivity and argue against alarmist or foolish interpretations (such as the obvious alarmist tone of AIT) I see good scientists lining up ideologically rather than methodologically, and find this painful to watch.

Often I have spoken to people who serve professional advisers with services such as process software and documentation, document management, help - lines and consultancy services, who do not see themselves as being in publishing or as part of the same mix as their more obvious publishing colleagues.

There are the obvious legal certifications — board - certified doctors and legally licensed drivers — but what about positions in which the lines blur, such as project management and information technology?