Not exact matches
Indeed, the
overwhelming consensus among mathematicians who work with transfinites is that transfinite mathematics entails no ontological commitment.4 In fact, when Platonic realism or Russellian logicism (which holds to the extra-mental reality of infinite sets) are employed as interpretations of infinite sets, we open the door to the very antinomies and problematics,
such as the Burali - Forti antinomy and Russell's difficulty with sets and impredicative definitions, which have led mathematicians and philosophers of mathematics to new interpretations of set theory
such as the axiomatic.
The
overwhelming margin of victory reflects both the popularity of
such oversight legislation and a bipartisan political
consensus that NSF stumbled in policing the $ 434 million project, which was downsized last year and then put under new management after it fell behind schedule and threatened to go $ 80 million over budget.
With the establishment of the scientific
consensus on climate change, is it reasonable and sensible to ask of government officials who remain obstructive and in denial of
such overwhelming scientific data if they are perfidiously engaged in a violation of public trust and, therefore, malfeasant in office?
But given the
overwhelming consensus of the scientific community, where does this doubt held by
such a large proportion of the public stem from?
If we have
such an
overwhelming scientific «
consensus» about the supposed threat of catastrophic man - made global warming — and about the political and economic solutions to it — then why do advocates have to sue scientists to prevent them from questioning it?
We must so embed in public consciousness the
overwhelming scientific
consensus on climate change that even
such a well - funded disinformation industry,
such incompetence and complicity from traditional media outlets, and what now has become boilerplate lunacy from Republicans can not dissipate it.
In fact, 97 percent of actively publishing climate scientists agree — that's right, there is an
overwhelming 97 %
consensus position that global warming is real and largely driven by human activities
such as the burning of fossil fuels.
Much confusion and spin infects current public discussion of «peer reviewed» research: first we had Maurice Newman, the Chairman of the ABC, who suggested that «distinguished scientists» challenge the
overwhelming scientific
consensus on climate change by «peer reviewed research», although he oddly failed to name
such research.
In December 2004 the RealClimate blogsite stated: «One could debate whether
overwhelming consensus is adequate grounds for action on climate change, but there are no grounds for debating whether
such consensus actually exists.»