Astronomers were at a loss to explain how
such planets formed and whether there was a continuum between rocky terrestrial «super-Earths» and gassy «mini-Neptunes.»
Not exact matches
All universes (plural) may well have been
formed in one swelling swoop thusly becoming a uniformed dimension so ginormous our universe could well be a part of combined universes
forming say a giant seahorse living within a sea so vast all being a part of a ginormous
planet so huge we may never know
such a thought of plausible revelation.
Humans are capable of
forming ethical, well - reasoned decisions without needing to perpetuate
such incoherent, closed - minded fantasy... I swear, christians are among the most frightened, baby - brained people on the
planet!
They are found to be a very Rich & Powerful Groups and Mother of Groups that control lives of Millions... Now Finding Peace means that we should think on how to get those Master Keys or Super Master Keys of Super Powerful Groups that are to be gathered all in one Ring lock that works to getting them to work towards One Purpose only and that is on how to make Human Life better Globally and that by investing in them human populations worldwide not minding their Race or Faith or Political interests
such will work towards Building Bridges between all Nations holding and calling one Message of Love and Sharing in some
form of Brotherhood that works towards a Greener
Planet Earth!?
Hegel's narrative of the world Spirit presented it in
such a linear
form, and Teilhard's narrative of the development of life and humanity on this
planet is also quite linear.
But a nuclear war would do
such irreparable damage to both humanity and the ecology of the
planet that it could bring an end not to specific acts of aggression but to all the higher
forms of life on the
planet.
We who sacrifice fabulous resources to fatten the most inhuman
form of violence so that it will continue to protect us, and who pass our time in transmitting futile messages from a
planet that is risking destruction to
planets that are already dead» how can we have the extraordinary hypo crisy to pretend that we do not understand all those people who did
such things long before us: those, for example, who made it their practice to throw a single child, or two at the most, into the furnace of a certain Moloch in order to ensure the safety of the others?
Using god for science is wrong.Materials be came present after the big bang as atoms.Eventually processes started which created rock.Our
planet came together with many materials,
such as gold, platinum and others.When a rainforest dies when it dries up, gets buried and compresses to
form coal.Oil is made from sea organisms that die and get buried.The brain uses algorithms to process information.God does not need to be included.
If it wasn't you wouldn't be here to ask
such a question and life would have
formed on a suitable
planet in another solar system.
A solitary
planet in an eccentric orbit around an ancient star may help astronomers understand exactly how
such planetary systems are
formed.
Planets don't form in such tidy arrangements, which suggests that the TRAPPIST - 1 planets were born in orbits farther out, before migrating inward and becoming trapped in the stable, resonant
Planets don't
form in
such tidy arrangements, which suggests that the TRAPPIST - 1
planets were born in orbits farther out, before migrating inward and becoming trapped in the stable, resonant
planets were born in orbits farther out, before migrating inward and becoming trapped in the stable, resonant orbits.
Forming in the system's colder outer regions, where volatile compounds
such as water and carbon dioxide freeze out, makes it possible that the
planets incorporated those ices and carried them along to a warmer place where they could melt, evaporate, and become oceans and atmospheres.
Inspired by a 2012 paper that proposed a correlation between
such hotspots and the velocity of seismic waves moving through Earth's interior, UC Santa Barbara geochemist Matthew Jackson teamed with the authors of the original paper — Thorsten Becker of the University of Texas at Austin and Jasper Konter of the University of Hawaii — to show that only the hottest hotspots with the slowest wave velocity draw from the primitive reservoir
formed early in the
planet's history.
The spectacular discs that ALMA has imaged around much younger stars,
such as HL Tauri, contain much more material that is in the process of
forming planets.
Dust belts are the remains of material that did not
form into larger bodies
such as
planets.
This was a surprise, because the gas should have spread evenly around the
planet, so Franck Lefevre and François Forget of the Pierre and Marie Curie University in Paris, France, created a climate model to explain how
such concentrations might
form.
This technique can determine whether a spot on the
planet's surface is rising or falling over time,
such as near a volcano on the verge of erupting or a sinkhole about to
form.
Globular clusters contain far lower concentrations of the
planet -
forming heavy elements —
such as carbon, oxygen, and iron — than do our sun and nearby stars, leading some to suspect that it might be difficult for
planets to
form there.
Frank and Sullivan calculate that even if the chances of
forming such a «high tech» species are 1 in a 1,000 trillion, there will still have been 1,000 occurrences of a history like own on
planets across the «local» region of the Cosmos.
If the
planet is covered by an immense amount of water, the pressure at the bottom of the ocean will increase to
such an extent that water occurs in the
form of «Ice VII,» which does not exist on Earth.
It's hard to know how they
formed: The brown dwarfs seem too heavy to have
formed from the slow agglomeration of material, like jumbo - sized
planets such as Jupiter.
Now that the scientists have a better idea of how long the solar nebula persisted, they can also narrow in on how giant
planets such as Jupiter and Saturn
formed.
Deep - sea hydrothermal vents give rise to some of the most bizarre
forms of life on the
planet,
such as blind albino crabs.
Such orbital migration would destroy any smaller, Earth - like
planets that had
formed, as an inward - moving giant would scatter smaller
planets the way a bowling ball would blast through a pile of marbles.
Such distant giants lend support to the most radical challenge to standard theory, in which some
planets form not by core accretion, but by a process called gravitational instability.
Such planets are thought to
form in a gas - rich disk.
Since the 1990s, scientists have been discussing using aircraft to inject aerosols,
such as sulfates, into the atmosphere as a
form of geoengineering to mimic volcanic eruptions that sometimes cool the
planet by casting shades of particulate matter.
Such an event could enable bacteria and other
forms of life to make their way from one
planet in the solar system to another and perhaps beyond.
Kilonovas are predicted to
form such elements in abundance, spraying them out into space where they could become part of future generations of stars and
planets.
Such planets may create stable regions where Earth - like worlds can
form and may shield those worlds from collisions with comets and asteroids.
This makes it a perfect laboratory to study how many
planets form in
such a crowded environment, and whether they
form mostly around more massive or less massive stars.»
Hundreds of
such bodies circled the sun before the larger ones cannibalized the rest to
form Earth and the other modern
planets.
Stars and their
planets all grow out of the same spinning disc, which means that a system needs something extra —
such as interstellar gas, a bucking
planet -
forming disc or magnetic fields — to explain the mismatch.
This makes it a perfect laboratory to study how many
planets form in
such a crowded environment.
Meanwhile, detections of extrasolar
planets prove that
planets form in
such disks — and often.
This new
planet is among the least endowed with
such metals that we know of, and because it is so bright it should serve as a benchmark for comparative studies of how and under what conditions
planets form.»
Thus, «giant chunks of space debris clobbering the
planet and wiping out life on Earth has undeniably broad appeal,» Meltzer says, whereas «no one in Hollywood makes movies» about more nuanced explanations,
such as Clovis points disappearing because early Americans turned to other
forms of stone tool technology as the large mammals they were hunting went extinct as a result of the changing climate or hunting pressure.
«It's a big shock» that
such a
planet could
form, says Sigurdsson, whose team reports its results in the 11 July issue of Science.
The interiors of the icy satellites of giant
planets,
such as in Jupiter's moon Europa, have conditions where carbonic acid could
form.
Volatiles
such as sodium and zinc were long assumed to have been blasted away in Earth's collision with a Mars - sized
planet that
formed the moon roughly 4.5 billion years ago.
How
such a dense
planet formed is unclear, the researchers say, but it's probably the crystalline vestige of a white dwarf star whose atmosphere was stripped away by the parent pulsar.
So far there are few if any wholly satisfactory explanations as to how
such an extremely elongated solid object could naturally
form, let alone endure the forces of a natural high - speed ejection from a star system — a process thought to involve a wrenching encounter with a giant
planet.
The largest stars explode soon after birth, rocking their cradles and enriching their galaxies with
planet - and life -
forming materials
such as oxygen and iron, while stars born small live quiet lives and make little contribution to their galactic homes.
The team's observations, as well as previous studies, haven't spotted any nascent
planets inside the protoplanetary disk, she notes: Either those measurements haven't had high enough resolution to discern the objects, or it's too early in the star's evolution for
such bodies to have
formed.
About nine times as massive as Jupiter and composed mainly of gas, the
planet is only a few million years old, proving that
such enormous planetary bodies can
form rapidly.
That rules out some previously proposed ways of
forming Mercury with its relatively huge molten iron core,
such as having the nascent sun blasting away the outer rind of an Earthlike
planet.
Such stars are belted with circumstellar disks of starlight - warmed gas and dust that, as they
form planets, develop clumps, rings and warps.
The spacecraft will orbit Jupiter to study its interior, which may indirectly reveal insights about Earth as well —
such as how the core was
formed, where our
planet's magnetic field came from, and why we have so much water.
One school of thought was that
planets originally
formed dry, due to the high - energy, high - impact process of
planet formation, and that the water came later from sources
such as comets or «wet» asteroids, which are largely composed of ices and gases.
Existing theories assume that rings
form when objects
such as asteroids or comets are pulverised by the gravity of a
planet like Saturn.