«As a discussion facilitator, it was great to have
such quality discussion materials designed to facilitate «discussions» as opposed to «lectures.»
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause our actual results and financial condition to differ materially from those indicated in the forward - looking statements include, among others, the following: our ability to successfully and profitably market our products and services; the acceptance of our products and services by patients and healthcare providers; our ability to meet demand for our products and services; the willingness of health insurance companies and other payers to cover Cologuard and adequately reimburse us for our performance of the Cologuard test; the amount and nature of competition from other cancer screening and diagnostic products and services; the effects of the adoption, modification or repeal of any healthcare reform law, rule, order, interpretation or policy; the effects of changes in pricing, coverage and reimbursement for our products and services, including without limitation as a result of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014; recommendations, guidelines and
quality metrics issued by various organizations such as the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, the American Cancer Society, and the National Committee for Quality Assurance regarding cancer screening or our products and services; our ability to successfully develop new products and services; our success establishing and maintaining collaborative, licensing and supplier arrangements; our ability to maintain regulatory approvals and comply with applicable regulations; and the other risks and uncertainties described in the Risk Factors and in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations sections of our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10 - K and our subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form
quality metrics issued by various organizations
such as the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, the American Cancer Society, and the National Committee for
Quality Assurance regarding cancer screening or our products and services; our ability to successfully develop new products and services; our success establishing and maintaining collaborative, licensing and supplier arrangements; our ability to maintain regulatory approvals and comply with applicable regulations; and the other risks and uncertainties described in the Risk Factors and in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations sections of our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10 - K and our subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form
Quality Assurance regarding cancer screening or our products and services; our ability to successfully develop new products and services; our success establishing and maintaining collaborative, licensing and supplier arrangements; our ability to maintain regulatory approvals and comply with applicable regulations; and the other risks and uncertainties described in the Risk Factors and in Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations sections of our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10 - K and our subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form 10 - Q.
This included a
discussion of the independent registered public accounting firm's judgments as to the
quality, not just the acceptability, of AMD's accounting principles and
such other matters that generally accepted auditing standards require to be discussed with the Audit and Finance Committee.
These
discussions included a review of the reasonableness of significant judgments, the
quality, not just acceptability, of the Company's accounting principles and
such other matters as are required to be discussed with the audit committee by Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 61, as amended (Communications with Audit Committees), by the Auditing Standards Board of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
The distinction between preaching which has a moral
quality and
discussion of morality as
such ought to be plain enough.
In a pluralistic society
such as ours, therefore, finding a common consensus of desirable
qualities necessary in human society as a beginning point for
discussion about the role the media play in contributing to, or detracting from
such shared
qualities, is awfully elusive.
With regard to interfaith encounter, Merton gives us, once again, not a systematic
discussion but a sketch of the kind of person able to take part in
such encounter with the necessary
quality of engagement.
Beyond honing communications skills, participants said while the
discussions often started off with broad trends in climate science, invariably the exchanges shifted to specific local issues
such as wildfires, ozone levels, crop rotations, sea level rise, droughts and air
quality.
He continues «Our paper highlights the fact that science is no exception, and that
discussions about research papers in social media
such as Twitter and Facebook offer a new dimension of scientific
quality, by reflecting how important and societally relevant new research findings might be.
This set of resource includes: • 6 attractive PowerPoint presentations which lead the class through each of the lessons • Fun and thought provoking activities and
discussion starters, worksheets and questions to reinforce the learning • 6 differentiated homework tasks • A mark sheet which allows pupils to track their own progress • An end of unit test to prepare the students for exams or can be used as a form of assessment • A complete teacher's guide including easy to follow lesson plans • An answer booklet to help the teacher along The lessons are: Lesson 1 — Looking into ethical and moral dilemmas
such as driverless cars and the impact of technology on modern life Lesson 2 — More ethical dilemmas including the ratings culture, medical apps, sharing personal data and cyber bullying Lesson 3 — Environmental issues with technology and how organisations and individuals can reduce these effects Lesson 4 — The Computer Misuse Act 1990 Lesson 5 — The Data Protection Act 1998 Lesson 6 — Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 For more high -
quality resources written by this author visit www.nicholawilkin.com
Current
discussions of the importance of teacher
quality for achievement generally ignore
such environmental features as district management and decisionmaking.
While it is crucial to analyze and debate the wisdom of
such policies, the
discussion must be informed by evidence of the highest
quality.
For much of the past few years, reflecting general concerns about the
quality of public schooling,
discussions of magnet schools have centered on their potential for providing intensive instruction in
such subjects as science and mathematics, serving as models of effectiveness, and increasing family choice within the public system.
It also contains first - person analysis from commentary contributors,
such as Rick Hess of the American Enterprise Institute, and Teaching Ahead: A Roundtable, an interactive project developed by Education Week Teacher and the Center for Teaching
Quality and featuring teacher - led
discussions on America's public schools.
As described in further detail in the
discussion of the proposed rule for § 1302.92, this proposed change will ensure teaching staff receive effective professional development, based on a growing body of research demonstrating the effectiveness of intensive professional development for improving teacher practices in early care and education settings [301302303] and research demonstrating that
such strategies support are associated with improved teacher practice in the classroom and a positive increase in classroom
quality.
If the rubric specifies that only
such things as the number, length,
quality, and accuracy of the posts are graded and not
such things as «timely contribution to
discussion,» the instructor can not dock students any points for making all of his or her posts for the week between 10:00 pm and 11:55 pm on Sunday.
To help encourage a more even flow of posts, I inserted a timeliness grading system into a standard
discussion grading rubric that also measured other aspects of posts,
such as
quality, courtesy, and freedom from errors.
Save for a few NAACP branches (including its affiliate in Connecticut, have stepped up in the
discussions over Gov. Dan Malloy's school reform effort, and advocated on behalf of Bridgeport mother Tanya McDowell, who will serve five years for trying to provide her child with a high -
quality school), the nation's oldest civil rights group offers nothing substantial on addressing issues
such as ending Zip Code Education policies, expanding school choice, addressing childhood illiteracy, and revamping how teachers are recruited, trained, paid, and evaluated (especially when it comes to bringing more black men into the teaching profession).
One common method involves circulating work samples,
such as lab reports, that a previous year's class completed, in view of prompting a
discussion about
quality.
Apart from the galleries» presentations there are artist projects by The Bruce High
Quality Foundation, Rirkrit Tiravanija, Aaron Young, and others, and public programs
such as a book signing with Ida Applebroog, performances and
discussions.
Consider this though: Since the
discussion surrounds science to public communication, it is necessary to have
such intermediate level information of high
quality that is accessible for people who are beyond wiki cartoon diagrams but not yet at differential equations.
There were other clear linkages to the ongoing UNFCCC negotiations in the
discussions, for instance on: what period can be referred to as «pre-industrial,» how to describe the
qualities of
such metrics as Global Warming Potential and Global Temperature Potential, and how to address the implications of RCP scenarios in the context of staying below 2 °C of warming or a lower warming target.
Such discussions were a necessary reminder that law publishing is still about optimum
quality content, at least as much as it is about platforms, search tools and other software.
If so, that does say much about the
quality of academic
discussions or the academics making
such comments.
To prepare it for its
discussions with the LCS, the Law Society wants solicitors» views on this proposal (see www.lawsociety.org.uk), which raises issues
such as: the usefulness of complaint data for clients in assessing the
quality of service; the impact of publication on informal resolution procedures already in place; and the possible reputational consequences for firms.
Its mission is to serve as a high - level, nonpartisan forum to promote analysis and
discussion on improving health and health care, and to address
such issues as cost,
quality, and access.
Facilitated group
discussions on topics
such as financial aid,
qualities of a successful student
Please join the Center for American Progress Action Fund and Senator Patty Murray (WA) for a
discussion on the need to refocus the budget debate on our long - term challenges by prioritizing crucial investments
such as expanding access to
quality early education.