Neff is an avid student of
such social distinctions.
Not exact matches
human beings, «born free and equal in dignity and rights,» are entitled to human rights «without
distinction of any kind,
such as race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or
social origin, property, birth or other status.
Social theorists today seem largely unaware of any
such distinction, and this is why they pay so little attention to solitude.
Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms of this Declaration without
distinction of any kind
such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or
social origin, property, birth or other status».
When these worldview differences are aligned with other
social distinctions —
such as economic class, race, region or religion — competition can turn from civil politics to cultural war.
In political and
social thought, no Christian has ever written a more profound defense of the democratic idea and its component parts,
such as the dignity of the person, the sharp
distinction between society and the state, the role of practical wisdom, the common good, the transcendent anchoring of human rights, transcendent judgment upon societies, and the interplay of goodness and evil in human individuals and institutions.
But when they switch to other religious faiths and experience the same
distinctions — albeit in different forms — they realize that
such a change neither improves their
social status nor remedies their economic problems of unemployment and poverty — the real source of their
social discrimination.
Government benefits are the same in both but making the
distinction is important for census data and for
social responses to potential issues
such as disease, divorce and family interactions.
But most queer theorists — and, for that matter, most academics throughout the humanities and the
social / behavioral disciplines today — will readily concede that
such distinctions are fledgling constructs and not much more.
Our very Constitution binds us, that is to say, the very breath of our political nostrils binds us, to disown all
distinctions among men, to disregard persons, to disallow privilege the most established and sacred, to legislate only for the common good, no longer for those accidents of birth or wealth or culture which spiritually individualize man from his kind, but only for those great common features of
social want and dependence which naturally unite him with his kind, and inexorably demand the organization of
such unity....
Such a «
social constructionist» conception of science might seem as menacing to Hawking as it would to Wordsworth, both of whom need to believe that, whatever ontological affinities must be conceded, the
distinction between daffodils and stinkweeds is grounded not only in the human intuition about the world but in the nature of things.
To make
such a
distinction requires a carefully circumscribed definition of health, one quite different from the famous definition once given by the World Health Organization: «a state of complete physical, mental, and
social well - being, and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.»
Because of one
social distinction, you may focus on other differences between yourself and that person,
such as her or his culture, upbringing and experiences — differences that you would not expect from another Chinese collaborator.
Dysfunction of these mechanisms drives diseases
such as cancers, in which
social controls on multicellularity fail, and autoimmune disorders, in which
distinctions between self and non-self are disrupted.
While blurring the traditional
distinction between fiction and reality — and revealing the experience of fiction to be as palpable as anything in daily life — Huyghe's playful work often addresses complex
social topics,
such as the yearning for utopia, the lure of spectacle in mass media, and the impact of Modernism on contemporary values and belief systems.
It is a nonsense to try and draw a
distinction between mentioning one's office on a firm / chambers website, printed CV or on
social media — and
such a prohibition plainly can not apply across the board (if I told you I was a judge I'd have to kill you).
Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, without
distinction of any kind,
such as race, creed, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or
social origin, property, birth or other status.