Think about how it feels to be on the receiving end of
such sweeping, all - or - none critical statements: Being told you never do anything right or always mess up in some way is likely to lead to high levels of frustration and a sense of hopelessness («If I can't do anything right, why even bother trying?!»).
«It is essential that the Commission gets a full and accurate picture of how changes to net neutrality will affect the everyday lives of Americans before they can act on
such sweeping policy changes.»
There's no reason to be without this valuable coverage, especially when it's so inexpensive and can make
such sweeping changes in your life when the worst happens.
There is
no such sweeping category to support Federal jurisdiction over the environment.
No state has even suggested, let alone adopted,
such a sweeping requirement.
He wrote that «the speculative ills targeted by the social networking policy are not sufficient to justify
such sweeping restrictions on officers» freedom to debate matters of public concern.»
Such a sweeping conclusion can not be drawn from a single comparison.
Some historians have speculated that climate must have played a role for
such sweeping political changes to have happened simultaneously; fragmentary accounts suggest that dry periods may have been punctuated with devastating floods.
But industry representatives complained that
such a sweeping moratorium would outlaw virtually all drilling in New York, including in its portion of the Marcellus shale, a vast and deep deposit of natural gas stretching under several states.
You might want to learn and think about the things you criticize, especially if you are going to make
such sweeping judgments on their value.
Learn some economics before making
such sweeping projections.
If PSU did not ask the question, on what basis did they claim to have examined «all» the evidence and that they were able to make
such a sweeping conclusion?
You must be from the future and have advanced knowledge beyond the rest of the scientific community to make
such a sweeping comment.
Such sweeping measures — which face stiff opposition from certain industries and would require political will and cooperation not seen for decades — are, sadly, very likely to fail right now.
He finds, as
such sweeping looks tend to, that both optimists and pessimists have a case.
If you ACTUALLY BELIEVE that there is «very high confidence» that we have enough understanding of «natural forcings» to make
such sweeping and confident declarations, you are a fool and pretty much deserve all the bad things you have coming to you.
Such a sweeping conclusion, so comprehensive in scope, would need a larger team than just Indur M. Goklany as the sole author.
Are you sure you're familiar enough with the topic to make
such sweeping statements with such simulated authority?
Consider that combating climate change requires nothing less than a radical restructuring of how the world makes and uses energy, and consider the overwhelming level of public concern it would take to impose
such sweeping changes on the vested interests profiting by the status quo (and let's be honest... to impose such changes on a public comfortable with the status quo).
Having made
such a sweeping statement you must have already read these kinds of sources and can produce them readily.
How often does it happen that everyone likes
such a sweeping show?
There were, after all, only 41 cats involved in the study — hardly the kind of sampling required to make
such sweeping statements.
Such sweeping generalizations do little to increase public safety; they encourage unwarranted and unrealistic urban myths, and ignore the legions of families who own these targeted animals without incident.
It's no surprise that the authors of the report offer no evidence to support
such a sweeping claim.
There's no reason to be without this valuable coverage, especially when it's so inexpensive and can make
such sweeping changes in your life when the worst happens.
But apparently it's perfectly OK for * you * to make
such sweeping generalizations as: «Seems to me she's going in knowing that most of the authors can't possibly get a damn thing out of this because they will never make the crucial sales figure to ping the publishers» radar.
Others argue that
such a sweeping mandate is not necessary.
Your track record disqualifies you from making
such a sweeping decision that will do irreparable damage to... Read More
For the foreseeable future, however, desegregation on
such a sweeping scale is not in the cards.
A task force in Los Angeles has only begun to consider
such sweeping changes, which would go well beyond the pledge Cortines made Thursday.
Some districts will, in the end, be much bigger winners (low - income and English Language Learners in this case) than say some suburban higher - income districts, but everyone needs to get something in order to have a deep and wide coalition to pass
such a sweeping bill.
This professional development is essential to making
such sweeping changes.
By the same token, we can't judge our schools solely by how well students perform on assessments in the very first year of
such a sweeping new initiative as the Common Core.
However, critics say the fossil record isn't complete enough for
such a sweeping analysis.
«As a former government lawyer I know the old trick of starting with
such a sweeping proposal than any concession makes you look more reasonable.
In the absence of any public consultation on
such a sweeping package of measures as TTIP represents, anyone concerned about the environment, the NHS, education, civil liberties, public safety or even just democracy in its widest sense, needs to make their voice heard.
Cuomo initially wanted the corporation to be able to terminate the contracts of projects but lawmakers balked at giving the new agency
such sweeping powers.
Such sweeping surveillance powers can threaten the privacy of ordinary citizens, and thereby fundamental liberties.
At the same time, Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie has insisted
such sweeping changes to state government should not be rushed through in a matter of weeks.
Subsequently, by virtue of defining that an adult and infant are unable to safely sleep on the same surface together, such as what occurs during bedsharing, even when all known adverse bedsharing risk factors are absent and safe bedsharing practices involving breastfeeding mothers are followed, an infant that dies while sharing a sleeping surface with his / her mother is labeled a SUID, and not SIDS.26 In this way the infant death statistics increasingly supplement the idea that bedsharing is inherently and always hazardous and lend credence, artificially, to the belief that under no circumstance can a mother, breastfeeding or not, safely care for, or protect her infant if asleep together in a bed.27 The legitimacy of
such a sweeping inference is highly problematic, we argue, in light of the fact that when careful and complete examination of death scenes, the results revealed that 99 % of bedsharing deaths could be explained by the presence of at least one and usually multiple independent risk factors for SIDS such as maternal smoking, prone infant sleep, use of alcohol and / or drugs by the bedsharing adults.28 Moreover, this new ideology is especially troubling because it leads to condemnations of bedsharing parents that border on charges of being neglectful and / or abusive.
How is it that you feel qualified to make
such sweeping blanket statements and wrap it all up with your simple homily of «Where there's a will, there's a way?»
Such a sweeping overhaul would go a long way to recapturing the attention of those who've turned away.
I am sure you are right Jon but
such sweeping comments really do not sound good especially in this day and age.
Sir Alex Ferguson does appear to be looking to the future with his most recent acquistions (Hernandez, Smalling and Bebe) and it does seem that some of his squad players appear to have become surplus to requirements but would the Old Trafford side really make
such sweeping changes?
Curious for someone who allegedly had
such sweeping influence...
Can we really be shocked, then, when
such sweeping denunciations trigger political violence?
While I normally prefer caution in offering
such sweeping assessments, in this case I find no substantial reason to prescind from Kuntz's conclusion that Russell could be classified as a «process philosopher.»
After a century in which our science and politics have rejected any belief in the unique value of each person, surely
such a sweeping claim demands substantial supporting argument.
Solzhenitsyn's work takes
such sweeping dialectics to task as symptomatic of the modern predilection to reduction through abstraction.
But the correction need not have damned her as «a minor celebrity,» nor did it deserve
such a sweeping generalization based upon a single sentence.