Not exact matches
Still, he says that he doesn't want to be part of a party (i.e., the Republican party) that upholds what he describes as unreason, but he also doesn't claim that
such alleged scientific
truth regarding
ultimate questions of human destiny provides answers for public policy.
It is argued that reason alone is not able to arrive at any
truth about
such ultimate questions.
It can prepare people by exposing them to the
ultimate questions about what is «really real», and by giving them insights which will help them live in their daily lives in
such a way that those lives will have meaning,
truth, and security.
Questions
such as whether the language of «faith» has any authority in a scientific age, or whether mind and life are reducible to atoms and molecules, whether only the tangible is real, whether the human person is anything more than a complex physico - chemical mechanism, whether we are free or determined, whether there is any «objective»
truth to the symbols and myths of religion — all of these questions are asked at all only because what is fundamentally at issue is whether there is an
ultimate context that gives meaning to cosmic process and significance to our lives in this process.
So the
ultimate answer to this question is that our society and economy are not yet ready to realize the
truth of digital information and there is no point at which
such a file becomes illegal.