Sentences with phrase «such warm words»

At this year's 0pening General Session, NOLA's Mayor Mitch Landrieu spoke such warm words about our place in the hearts and minds of the people of New Orleans.

Not exact matches

The surveys asked 84,086 respondents to gauge the level of threat they attributed to climate change (some of the surveys used different words to describe the phenomenon, such as global warming and the greenhouse effect).

... yes I am such a dork and use that word... oops:p) Before I dish the deets on how to snag a pair of these sunnies let's break down this winter look (see I am slowly but surely wearing winter ensembles although I am constantly dreaming of warmer weather... I am in the midst of trying to plan a warm weather vacation... stay tuned...) I LOVE a faux fur vest as we all know so naturally I needed a gray one like this one that's retailing for under $ 50 (I simply couldn't survive without it duh!)

Build a word - bank as you go, focusing on describing words for the sea, such as «blue», «wavy», «cold», «cool», «warm»,» sparkly», «fun», «swishy», «fresh», «salty», «splashy», «deep», «green», «shiny» and «magical».

In other words, fearing high gasoline prices, tight energy supplies and global warming, a significant number of people have an unsavory opinion of big sport - utilities, such as the Ford Expedition and Chevrolet Suburban.

If you think that, the modern world does not have such a problem as global warming at all and all the dreadful and frightening things we hear every day are just gossiping, and spreading word in order to make the people being afraid, confused, and puzzled, you can do nothing but ground your point of view in your persuasive essay global warming writing.

Daizie is such a Sweetie as she loves to be loved She can be shy at first with new people but with some kind words and nice pets she warms up Daizie is working on her house training and crate training and at night sleeps in my room She is discovering how fun toys are and likes butcher bones and nylabones She also likes soft dog beds and blankets Daizie likes other dogs and enjoys having a fenced yard to play in She rides nice in the car.

Reports emerged in early 2015 that Florida government officials had unofficially banned state employees from using phrases such as «climate change» and «global warming» or words such as «sustainability» in their communications.

But, given the failure of decades of pledges and agreements aimed at curbing emissions, I suggested it was time to move away from a longstanding focus on numerical goals — such as 350 (parts per million of CO2), 80 percent (in emissions cuts) by 2050, a 2 - degree limit on warming — and toward the goal of maximizing the suite of traits I described in those eight words.

So I take it that the consensus view is that according to our best current scientific understanding, there is no possibility whatsoever of any catastrophic consequences of anthropogenic global warming; therefore to use the word «catastrophic» is irresponsible alarmism;, and therefore the deniers are actually quite right to accuse anyone who suggests that such outcomes are possible of being an irresponsible alarmist.

Setting aside the word propaganda, I will readily assert that there has been a longstanding and well - financed effort to raise public concern by downplaying substantial, persistent and legitimate uncertainty about the worst - case outcomes from greenhouse - driven warming and over-attributing the link between such warming and climate - related disasters and other events.

In other words, there are many such threshold tipping points in the bio-geophysical-social system, but the problem is we don't know precisely where they are — ergo the need to frame it probabilistically and my skateboard ramp is an analogy to the steepening threats as we add warming.

In other words, I am not defending the «consensus,» I doubt that human CO2 emissions are causing global warming, I doubt that such warming would be bad for humans, and I doubt any catastrophic tipping points are imminent.

It's been criticized, and may well not be the last word on the subject, but their estimate was droughts such as the one that was observed are about 3x more likely under the observed warming than in an «unwarmed» world.

It is astounding that dangerous man - made global warming fanatics like Obama and Prince Charles, in addition to all those climate change charlatans at various academies of science such as The Royal Society, prefer to ignore real word observational data on climate and solar activity, in favour of psuedo - science and climate models that consistently have failed in their scenarios and projections.

Considering the 250 - y record from Stockholm, it becomes obvious that these last 100 y of warming climate comprise only one section of a fluctuating climate, or, in other words, a small fraction of a series of several such fluctuations in the temperature.

In other words, under solar or anthropogenic influence the changes in mean climate values, such as the global temperature, are less important than increased duration of certain climate patterns associated say with cold conditions in some regions and warm conditions in the other regions

While tweets using terms like «climate change» are more likely to include language that garners a positive response on the Hedonometer, like «sea,» «oceans,» and «nature,» Twitter users who prefer to tweet about «global warming» are more likely to use negative words such as «fraud,» «politicians,» and «blame» in their tweets as well.

But the only mention of these words in the IPCC report are in the section «Anthropogenic warming could lead to some impacts that are abrupt or irreversible, depending upon the rate and magnitude of the climate change», which reveals a far less frightening and urgent picture than such accounts suggests:

According to research published last week by Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University (Geophysical Research Letters, vol 39, L06801), the rapid warming in the Arctic is affecting atmospheric circulation further south, making weather patterns more persistent — more blocking, in other words — which makes some kinds of extreme weather, such as heatwaves, more likely.

In other words: Proposed strategies to alter the amount of sunlight hitting the Earth's surface by (for example) deliberately injecting millions of tons of sulfate aerosols into the stratosphere pose enormous risks and uncertainties and don «t address the underlying causes of global warming or other major risks from rising concentrations of carbon dioxide, such as ocean acidification.

So, that is what we came up with — A few very simple models, such as the one that involves 3 objects: one object A producing thermal energy and radiating energy at a fixed rate, two other objects B and C whose temperature is determined via radiative balance with object A and empty space, with a geometry such that the temperature of object B is higher than that of object C. And, what we wanted to illustrate is that the object C «warms» B in the colloquial sense of the word... i.e., that the presence of object C causes B to be at a higher temperature than if C is absent.

In other words will the small amount of warming cause the powerful GHGs (like water vapour) to increase the amount warmed or is the climate system stable such that there are feedback mechanisms which works to dampen and / maintain the climate in a «steady state».

In other words, we can say with high confidence that such extreme anomalies would not have occurred in the absence of global warming.

Such words gave some environmental commentators hope that Obama would move eventually on the issue, however many have been urging Obama for years to become a «climate hawk» — not just taking swift and large - scale action to reduce emission, but also fully communicating with the American people about the threats posed by a warming world, including impacts on national security and the economy.