Not exact matches
If someone is injured owing to the existence of the dangerous condition on the
premises then that person can
sue the owner for damages
under the Occupier Liability Act in BC.
Mrs. Stevens
sued the owner of the laundromat for damages
under Florida
premises liability law.
The plaintiff
sued the church
under a
premises liability theory.
She
sued the defendant
under theories of negligent activity and
premises liability.
The appellant
sued the respondents alleging negligence, breach of duty of care, and breach of their duty
under s. 3 (1) of the Occupiers» Liability Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. O. 2, to «take such care as in all the circumstances of the case is reasonable to see that persons entering on the
premises, and the property brought on the
premises by those persons are reasonably safe while on the
premises.»
For example, if a patron walked into a restaurant and slipped on an unmarked, just - mopped floor, causing injury,
under premises liability they would be able to
sue the restaurant's owner in civil court to receive compensation for their medical bills and other related costs such as missed wages (if their injury prevented them for going to work or resulted in permanent disability).
For example, if you are on the board of your residential condo association and the board is
sued for a slip and fall injury of a third party on the condo
premises, there would be coverage
under the umbrella policy.