Massachusetts uses a no - fault system, which also limits one's rights to
sue under this system.
Not exact matches
As many journalists and commentators have argued, agreements like the TPP have dubious benefits for citizens of the countries involved.ISDS provisions have been criticised by U.S. Constitutional lawyer Lori Wallach for «empowering corporations to
sue governments — outside their domestic court
systems — over any action the corporations believe undermines their expected future profits or rights
under the pact by reporting breaches, removing online content and even denying access to Internet users».
Under the agreement, the village would agree not to
sue the two companies in the future for anything related to the village's existing wells and water
system.
A coalition of landlords and organizations is
suing the city
under the banner of Tax Equity Now NY in a class - action suit that claims the city's property tax
system is racially biased and favors the rich over the working - and middle - class.
The school funding
system is
under legal threat, with a group of charter schools
suing over alleged underfunding.
The Florida public - school establishment is
suing to repeal the Sunshine State's 13 - year - old school - choice tax credit and its new education savings accounts
under the state's Blaine Amendment and its «uniformity clause,» which mandates that «Adequate provision shall be made by law for a uniform, efficient, safe, secure, and high quality
system of free public schools...» The Florida Supreme Court previously struck down the state's voucher program
under this provision in Bush v. Holmes (2006), on the grounds that the vouchers «divert [ed] public dollars» from «the sole means set out in the Constitution for the state to provide for the education of Florida's children.»
Under the current workers» comp
system, an injured worker can not
sue his or her employer, but the worker is guaranteed benefits as long as he or she is eligible.
As far as could you be liable for writing it...
under our legal
system you can be
sued under a theory of negligence for just about any action someone thinks was unsafe or causes injury.
The Canadian Labour Congress made the point that workers gave up the right to
sue and that the Court needs to ensure fair treatment
under the WC
System.
Equal Justice
Under Law has also
sued six jurisdictions over their bail
systems, and all six no longer require defendants to pay bail as a condition of their release.
Under a no fault
system, you lose the right to
sue the driver for additional expenses; however, insurance providers still have this right.
First, drivers are governed
under a «Choice No - Fault»
system, which means that drivers can either choose to go with no - fault insurance, or stick with the classic «tort»
system which allows them to
sue for injuries related to an accident.
Kentucky is a Choice No - Fault state, which means a driver can reject the no - fault
system and
sue under the laws of the tort
system.
In a sense this makes the process of making a claim a lot easier than when insuring
under a tort
system (the more common way to handle road accidents in the United States); however, it also means you lose some of your rights to
sue the individual driver if faced with serious injury or fatality.
Under current law, anyone can be
sued for infringement for simply using a product,
system or method.
Under the law, patent recipients get the right to exclude others from using the technology for 20 years — unfortunately, the
system turned toxic when the Patent Office began issuing a flood of low - quality patents and lawyers and others began buying them up and
suing everyone in sight.