In a recent case called Regnier v. Regnier, the court considered a narrow issue: whether a wife's decision during the marriage to go back to school automatically meant that the husband
suffered financial disadvantage, for which he should be compensated by way of spousal support....
Not exact matches
The employment gaps also accentuate gender differences which already exist in legal employment, which helps illustrate how historically
disadvantaged groups are almost always the first to
suffer when the economy or a sector is placed under
financial strain.
If the other party has derived and retained a benefit, or the applicant has
suffered or would in the future
suffer «an economic
disadvantage», the court would be empowered to award a
financial settlement.
In some cases one spouse may have
suffered a
financial loss or
disadvantage as result of joint career and lifestyle decisions made during the marriage or relationship (for example the decision to move the family so that a spouse can take a new job, or that the mother will give up her career to stay home and raise the children).
However, the Court may order spousal support where one spouse has
suffered a
disadvantage either as a result of the relationship or its breakdown, the
financial consequences of the care of any child (ren) and the possibility of the spouse becoming self - sufficient.