Sentences with phrase «sufficient legal interest»

But even if our positive law could allow for the proposition that animals have sufficient legal interest to institute actions, granting this standing implies that animals have rights worthy of being protected in Court.

In provinces like Quebec, where the standing requirement is codified, the provision does not refer to humanness or personhood (see article 55 Code of Civil Procedure: «whoever brings an action at law -LSB-...] must have sufficient legal interest therein»).

Mandamus lies to secure the performance of a public duty in the performance which the applicant has a sufficient legal interest.

Not exact matches

(c) to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing or, if he has not sufficient means to pay for legal assistance, to be given it free when the interests of justice so require;

«When Canadian legal history is written, it may show that the profession was distracted by civility and failed to devote sufficient interest to access to justice,» he wrote in 2011.

It seems to me that if legal advice obtained by one person is passed on to another person for the sake of informing that other person in confidence of legal advice which that person needs to know by reason of a sufficient common interest between them, then it would be contrary to the principle upon which all legal professional privilege is granted to say that the legal advice which was privileged in the hands of the first party should be lost when passed over in confidence to the second party, merely because it was not done in the context of pending or contemplated litigation.

I argued that in the interest of access to justice we should have a safe harbor that encourages legal software development for consumers, if there were sufficient warnings to the consumer they were not dealing with a lawyer, but a software application.

The court found that the claimant must show he has sufficient interest in the deceased's estate to give him legal standing to bring a contentious probate claim.

In the criminal context, Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights provides that everyone has a right «to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing or, if he has not sufficient means to pay for legal assistance, to be given it free when the interests of justice so require.»

Following the principles of R. v. J.W., 2011 NSCA 76, the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal found analysis pursuant to s. 684 involves two separate inquiries: the first, to determine whether Mr. Martin has sufficient means to obtain legal assistance on his own; and the second, whether it is desirable in the interests of justice for Mr. Martin to have appointed assistance in this matter.

(1) A court of appeal or a judge of that court may, at any time, assign counsel to act on behalf of an accused who is a party to an appeal or to proceedings preliminary or incidental to an appeal where, in the opinion of the court or judge, it appears desirable in the interests of justice that the accused should have legal assistance and where it appears that the accused has not sufficient means to obtain that assistance.

By their very nature, policies of insurance are different; a beneficiary may be an insured party to the policy but even a non-contracting beneficiary has a legal interest sufficient to have the policy enforced and to argue for any interpretation that would be open to either of the contracting parties.

Carole Lucock and Michael Yeo have summarized four broad categories of interests that the courts have seen as sufficient to overcome the strong presumption in favour of the use of the legal name (while noting that the legal principles are not always clearly decipherable and at times their application is inconsistent or overlapping):

I am also interested in the change in legal thinking throughout the appeals — the arguments advanced by Ben Emmerson QC not finding sufficient favour at an earlier stage in the appeal process.

If inanimate constructs (like corporations and churches) and human beings who can not speak for themselves (like young children and persons with some disabilities) can advance their interests in court, no doubt we can summon sufficient legal creativity to realign our legal fictions to better reflect post-Darwinian facts.

Hello I would like to share my master plan of new जीवन anand policy My age is 30 I have purchased 7 policies of 1 lac sum assured and each maturity year term 26 to 32 I purchased in 2017 Along with I have purchased 3 policies of same jivananad of 11lac each Maturity year term 33,34,35 Now what will I have to pay is rs, 130000 premium per year means 370rs per day At age of 55 in year 2047 I will start getting return, of, 3lac maturity per year till 2054 For 7policies of i lac I buyed for safety of paying next 10 years premium of 130000 As year by year my liability goes on decreasing and at the age of 62 to 65 I get my major part of maturity amount around 16000000 one crore sixty lac Along with 4000000 sum assured continued for rest of life So from above example it is true that you can make money to make money for you You can enjoy a large sum by just paying 370 per day and you will feel you have earned 19000000 / 35 years = 1500 per day And assume if I die after 5 years then in this case also my spouse will get 7500000 as death claim against 650000 paid premium Whats bad in this A asset is getting created for you It is a property of 2 crores which you are buying for 35 year installment If you make fd of 2000000 Lacs against this policy u will get 135000 interest per year to pay for 35 years If u buy a flat for 20 lack in 2017 there is no scope of valuation of Flat will be 2 crores But as I described you are creating a class asset for your beloved easily just investing 10500 per year for 35 years And too buy a term of 50 Lacs with it And rest you earn deposit in ppf Keep in mind if you will survive then only ppf will create corpus for you but in lic your family is insured to a higher extent till 1 crore with term including And its sufficient if you are earning 100000per Month no problem for investing of 10 % in New जीवन anand with rest 90 % you go with ppf, mutual funds, equity, gold, lottery, real estate any thing but keep 10 % for new jeewan anand it's a class if you understand it properly and after all if you rely only on term there are more chances of rejecting claims as one thing is sure cheap things just come under warranty but lic brand is guaranteed because in case of demise if your nominee doesn't get claim then your all hardwork is going to be waste so think and invest take long term and bigger sum assured for least premium You can assign your policy for taking flat or property it is a legal asset of you But term never.

The Campaign to Stop Killer Robots welcomed the interest shown at the meeting in discussing Article 36 legal reviews of new weapons systems, but noted it is not going to be sufficient for a comprehensive international response to the risks of development of fully autonomous weapons.

When the patented invention is but a small component of the product the companies seek to produce and the threat of an injunction is employed simply for undue leverage in negotiations, legal damages may well be sufficient to compensate for the infringement and an injunction may not serve the public interest.

With a particular interest in criminal law, I have sufficient knowledge of handling legal research tools and e-discovery procedures.

Sufficient resourcing must be provided to Native Title Representative Bodies to guarantee that claimants have access to the best possible legal, financial and other advice required to secure their interests.