With
a sufficiently long time horizon, there is little risk to stock investing, because the impacts of stock volatility become less over time.
Over
a sufficiently long time horizon, stocks almost always achieve superior returns.
The counter argument to that of course, is that most people investing in a balanced (or equity fund for that matter) investment, do not have
a sufficiently long time horizon, ten years perhaps being the minimum commitment.
Not exact matches
Picking the
time horizon is a process of finding the best balance between having a sufficient amount of data for learning and having a
horizon that is
sufficiently long term.
Investing passively into the market is a much better choice if your
time horizon is
sufficiently long.