Sentences with phrase «suggest federal decision»

Recent signs, however, suggest federal decision makers are finally listening to teachers» concerns.

Not exact matches

The bill was tabled and written by councilperson Charles Allen, who suggested the decision was driven by federal rollbacks of health care that directly affect women nationwide.

Under Price and Verma, it could be the states once again making most of the decisions about mandatory benefits with the Federal government providing only a broad framework, Gibbs suggested.

He suggests that, in agreement with Lincoln, Supreme Court decisions should be binding only on the litigants and not on other branches of the federal government, nor on other states, as the case may be.

The U.S. Federal Reserve's decisions to increase interest rates and speeches from Mark Carney and Mario Draghi that suggested the possibility of sooner - than - expected rate increases at the Bank of England and the European Central Bank, respectively, appeared to weigh on the performance of dividend strategies.

Recent evidence suggests that the Federal Reserve's monetary policy stance, as gauged by changes in its policy stance (i.e., an increased or decreased target for the federal funds rate), provides useful information that can be effectively used to improve the allocation deFederal Reserve's monetary policy stance, as gauged by changes in its policy stance (i.e., an increased or decreased target for the federal funds rate), provides useful information that can be effectively used to improve the allocation defederal funds rate), provides useful information that can be effectively used to improve the allocation decision.

This «deadly» omission of information about Parvo for pet owners by the HSUS, that purportedly has a following of millions, suggests that there has been a conscious and unconscionable decision to keep the American Public and Elected Officials at the Federal, State and Local Levels of Government in the Dark so that the spread of Parvo and its deadly consequences will be inhumanely perpetuated, and be exploited and misrepresented to the American Public as being caused by irresponsible breeding practices in order to further enhance the fundraising activities of the HSUS.

And while the amounts awarded by the Federal Court have historically been modest, recent decisions suggest the reversal of this trend, making Canada a more attractive forum for enforcing patent rights.

We wrote here earlier this week about the Catholic connection — University of Chicago law professor Geoffrey R. Stone's post at the American Constitution Society's ACSBlog in which he suggests that religious affiliation may be the key to explaining last week's Supreme Court decision in Gonzales v. Carhart, upholding a federal law prohibiting so - called partial birth abortions.

It makes unnecessary the two step analysis of the applicability of provincial laws suggested by s. 88 of the Indian Act, RSC 1985, c I - 5 (at least so far as provincial laws are claimed to apply to «Indians» rather than «lands reserved») and the Court's decision in Dick, [1985] 2 SCR 309 — in fact we don't need s. 88 any longer since there are no longer any inapplicable provincial laws that need to be made applicable by operation of a federal statute.

I've suggested that the Harvard / Ravel deal will supercharge the wholesale market in short order because: 1) when the Ravel exclusivity period ends, the cache (over 40,000 volumes) will be available to anybody; and 2) the arrangement is also designed to «Encourage and assist federal and state courts in making all prospective court decisions freely accessible online».

He explains, «I have suggested that weighting the number of decisions of a federal court of appeals by the number of citations to those decisions by other courts of appeals, which is to say courts not bound as a matter of stare decisis to follow the cited court's decisions, yields a meaningful measure of judicial output.»

I had understood the Federal Circuit opinion to suggest between the lines (also in light of what the circuit judges said at the hearing) that Hauser should carry the day for Apple, but the decision didn't say so explicitly, much less direct entry of an injunction.

The decision also may suggest a limit to the Federal Circuit's willingness to defer to USPTO interpretation of AIA procedures.

«[T] he weight of authority suggests that accurate news reporting — even when it is likely to have an adverse impact on the subjects of the report — usually does not give rise to an action for intentional infliction of emotional distress»: Yesterday, a unanimous three - judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit issued a decision affirming a federal district court's dismissal of claims for invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress asserted by two former undercover police officers against a television station in Albuquerque that had revealed their identities and their undercover status in the context of a televised report about their suspected involvement in an alleged incident of sexual assault.

The decision, which determined a province could not unilaterally secede, also suggested that if a province had a popular mandate to do so, the Federal government had an obligation to negotiate on the issue.

Some commentators have suggested that this decision could endanger nationwide class action settlements in cases governed by state law (it's not a problem where federal law applies).

In the federal government's factum, Rupar suggests the 2001 decision had already dealt with the issue of reconciling competing rights under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in the context of TWU's community covenant that's at the heart of the current case.

In seeking leave to appeal that decision, the airline suggested that the Federal Court of Appeal was «cavalierly interfering» with the agency's ability to govern its own process.