Sentences with phrase «suggest reading what»

If you want to read more, I suggest reading what Kitchen Stewardship has to say about sourdough.

I suggest you read what the catechism says not what you think it says.

if anyone thinks i ammaking all this up i suggest they read what is written about Rev. Moon is the two gospel of Luke and matthew; it's all there; the beatings; the wine and the drunkeness; the marrying and givine in marriage; and of course the endless proplongations of the will that caused Rev. Moon to lose patience and finally marry in 1960 and then call himself «The Lamb of God».

I'll take you at your word regarding your recommendation to study and suggest you read WHAT GOD DOES TO YOUR BRAIN by two neuroscientists, Andrew Newberg who is a «theist» (believes in some kind of divine character) and Mark Waldman and agnostic (a non commit on the question).

if anyone thinks I am making all this up I suggest they read what is written about Rev. Moon is the two gospel of Luke and matthew; it's all there; the beatings; the wine and the drunkeness; the marrying and giving in marriage; and of course the endless proplongations of the will that caused Rev. Moon to lose patience and finally marry in 1960, and then call himself «The Lamb of God».

For those of you that believe that Kroenke will spend all our cash reserves, i suggest you read what he said at the MIT sloane conference.

In future I suggest you read what is said and make sure you understand it contextually before sharing your «views».

I suggest you read what was actually done instead of relying on my paraphrasing.

To assist you in better understanding this type of loan we suggest you read our What is a Reverse Mortgage page or look into calculating how much you may be able to receive using our free reverse mortgage calculator.

Not exact matches

The thing about meaning is that it's best conferred by giving the topic personal relevance,» explains Page19, which suggests that for each new book you ask yourself what you hope to learn, how it might change your life, and why you should bother reading it.

It's no shock that reading with kids is good for their intellectual development, but if you want them to get more out of books, blog Dumb Little Man suggests actively engaging your kids about what their reading.

Much of what we read about Stephen Harper and Barack Obama suggests both men are introverts.

It all suggests that the dramatic day and a half of legal proceedings are but a prelude to even more courtroom theatrics and combat in what has become a sordid, long - standing matter (for the full saga, read the Disturbing Decline of Sumner Redstone) that reflects poorly on countless participants, not least the boards of CBS and Viacom, which took no action to remove Redstone as their executive chairman until Herzer's case forced their hand.

I suggest you read your hysterical comments on the last post of your predictions for what would pass in Congress and then compare that to reality.

If you're new to Bitcoin and don't quite understand what mining is I suggest you read through our guide to Getting Started With Bitcoin or watch the video over at WeUseCoins.com.

If you don't know what a REIT is, I suggest you read my post about REITs here:

But there's much more we can learn from the survey findings: What struck me as most compelling as I was reading through the responses was the potential asset allocation ideas they suggest.

Only those interested in the truth will read what I suggested and can judge FOR THEMSELVES, as to what is true or not true.

Meanwhile, to Hawking's supporters who suggest that I am not owning up to his scientific «proofs,» I believe airwx has already said it best for me — he's a THEORETICAL physicist, and having read some of his work, I'm smart enough to know that much of what he says about God is an exercise in jumping to conclusions, even as sound as much of his scientific work is.

by the way, Your comment makes you looks like a clueless person, I suggest You read a holy bible and understand what I'm saying..

But that number is bound to change — I think I read an article that suggests it might be even older than what experts have been recently saying.

I strongly suggest that you go read up on what these terms you're throwing around so liberally really mean.

And it perhaps suggests that Christians are reading their Bibles for themselves and are not afraid to challenge what they regard as false teaching.

A three - step method for resolving conflicts constructively consists of: (1) telling each other what you appreciate; (2) telling each other what you each need; and (3) negotiating a better plan to meet as many of both sets of needs as possible This adaptation of the Intentional Marriage Method (Before using this communication tool, I suggest that you read H. Clinebell, Growth Counseling for Marriage Enrichment, chap 2) can be used in an individual family communication session, and in family clusters, camps, and counseling.

If you read closely, you'll see that I suggested an «un-caused cause» is the typical solution offered by theists who, after inferring the necessity of causation for all events, must then answer the question of what caused their proffered «cause.»

But I would suggest from what I have read that your house is none too sturdy and you lobbed a few rocks as well.

I suggest reading St.John of the Cross — Dark night of the soul as this is most likely what is happening.

Furthermore, there is VASTLY more to the Berkeley evolution site than what you are suggesting, so do give it a read.

I suggest you go back and read then try to comprehend what was written.

@nonono, I suggest that you actually step back, take a breath, and then read what I actually wrote — not what you wanted to see.

i suggest you stop being a hypocrite and read the bible for yourself and find out what a monster your christian god is.

I don't know what your viewpoint is on someone being gay and a Christian, but let me suggest that you read his book before you talk about the «choice» Wesley Hill made to be gay (he didn't), or how his father was abusive or absent (he wasn't), or how Wesley should just «man up» and fall in love with a woman (he's tried), or get «cured» by reading the Bible and praying more (he probably reads the Bible and prays more than you or I).

For others struggling with this issue, it may be seen as pastorally unhelpful, or confusing, as they try to work through what God wants for them, to read something which suggests gay relationships are permissible.

Atheists.agnostics.disbelievers, pagans what ever or whom ever you are suggest to leave faith, belief or religious disputes behind and just read the Bibles and the Quran as referance for history and for wisdoms that through reading helps us to think for our selves and decide for our selves with out being told what to believe or not to believe.

Read loses sight of Buber's concept of dialogue, however, when he suggests that Buber's teaching shows how to replace the inter-individual tensions of the classroom by «an organic mode of adaptation to the social organism as a whole» and when he reinterprets the teacher's concentration of an effective world as a selective screen in which what is kept in and what is left out is determined by the organic social pattern through the medium of the teacher's «sense of a total organism's feeling - behaviour.»

The way in which the reflexive verb is presented in the French suggests a tighter, internal immediacy than what we may be tempted to read into the English... «s» influencent» sounds much less like an actual multiplicity than does the phrase «influence each other.

I don't know what church you've been going to, but my minister goes to great pains before an election to not mention ANY candidate or particular ballot issue, but instead call on the congregation to read their scriptures (suggesting some references) and pray, pray, pray for God's guidance, as they get ready to cast their vote.

Read what Hawking had to say (nothing like you're suggesting): http://www.hawking.org.uk/quantum-cosmology-m-theory-and-the-anthropic-principle.html

Taking a clue from St. Augustine, we may ask ourselves what these readings suggest to the imagination about the Triune God.

In the first two exercises have someone read the instructions, stopping as long as necessary at each slash (/) for you to do what has been suggested.

What precisely is involved is suggested in a section of a lecture, «On Reading the Bible,» by Arthur Quiller - Couch: (On the Art of Reading [New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1920], pp. 145f.)

I mention this because I feel that the overall theme of this book is exactly what you are discussing in this post so if anyone reading this post wants to learn more I suggesting looking into the book.

And what's wrong about it — when linked to the sentiment expressed on placards reading «We are all Charlie Hebdo» — suggests just how much trouble Europe is in, as it confronts this new form of war.

I suggest you do a little reading on what they are doing over at CERN using the LHC.

Gladwell isn't read best as a discoverer of facts, but as an observer of trends and anomalies who dares to suggest what they might mean.

Pastor, I'm just wondering if you yourself follow ALL the rest of this portion of the Law ie vs 19 or vs 27 regarding cutting the hair at the side of your head, or vs 32 regarding «rising in the presence of elders» or... vs 30 regarding observing the Sabbath — especially after what Our Lord Jesus did in Matt 12 and what He taught in Matt 5 - 7?!? I would suggest that you «do not choke at gnats and swallow camels», and that you prayerfully read what the apostle Paul wrote in 1 Cor 9: 3, 19 - 23 esp vs22 - 23.

This is what Paul calls himself in Romans 1 (a great book in the Bible, I suggest you read it!).

As time goes buy the kind defenders of free will over their rejection to «dead» here and colossians 2:13 tend to resort to a familiar defense, that of labeling it a Calvinist viewpoint and that its almost a cultist view point to hold.Very sad yet very much the defense of many christians.Dead may i suggest is dead, the inability to respond, does not mean that prior to being saved one could not read scripture but because of this spiritual deadness its not profitabel / meaningful - we just can not continue to revise the meaning of dead to fit a view point - because natural man has not been born again this deadness (spiritually) shows itself as «none seek after God», in this condition they are» slaves to sin» and the spiritual things of God (the bible) is «folly / foolishness» even the gospel is judged by natural man as «folly / foolishness «(1 cor.1: 18) Please stop with this weak / common defense called Calvinism - many believers are truly turned off by such a defense.We must not forget the man's «free will» is what took the whole human race down in the garden; i would hope we can rise above our love affair with the human will.

It is suggested that to get an idea of the liberal temper that pervaded the early twentieth century, one need only to read A. Hamack's book, What is Christianity?

And yet a literary critical reading of Mark suggests that this pair of stories belongs together, and if we wish to understand what Mark had in mind by writing his Gospel, we had best keep them together.