Sentences with phrase «suggest warming things»

But in the interest of making your home extra cozy for the colder months, I suggest warming things up by introducing these harvest - inspired rugs.

Not exact matches

You know that whole «warm, draft - free place thing» always suggested for first risings?

«We have a warm culture with a lot of support and encouragement to try new things and suggest ideas,» Vice President of Marketing Stephanie Krause says.

Few things suggest summer in warm coastal areas more than fish tacos.

At one point, my wonderful nurse suggested a bath and while sitting sounded like the last thing I wanted to do, I knew that the warm water would probably be great.

Actually, it's due to the polls cited in the article — and those I have seen elsewhere — that suggest that the American public thinks, among other things, that scientists are still trying to determine if global warming is for real and that it's a major issue in the upcoming Presidential election.

While there are a number of things that can be done, one of the first things I often suggest is one litre of warm water with fresh lemon juice, first thing in the morning.

If red isn't your thing, then I suggest checking out the other colors — it comes in a pretty warm coral, navy, hunter green, purple and black.

We expect great things from both, because without the slightest shred of sentimentality they've steered a bitter, acerbic show in a surprisingly warm direction: there may not be love out there for all of us, but Cash and Donohue convincingly suggest that a best friend who totally gets us, warts and all, is way more important anyway.

And that's a good thing because market research presently suggests contemporary consumers do not like to think about winter during the summer months, so they put off buying warm outerwear until they really need it.

If it was grown in the warming up nicely sides of Greenland, that would suggest that things have not got so much changing to do.

Yet after all that, here you are, saying things like «Looks like an oceanic warming trend corresponding to the atmospheric warming trend from 1979 through 1998 begins around 2000, suggesting a delay of ca. 21 years.»

This suggests to me that he was getting the basics more or less right, which in turn emphasises the point that the best models and theory we have all predict and have consistently predicted the same thing: warming, and quite a bit of it by the end of this century if we keep dumping CO2 in the atmosphere at our current rates.

The results strongly suggest that global warming and climate change are used differently and mean different things in the minds of many Americans.

Dan De Silva @ 32, you have this thing where you think climate scientists make up science that suggests the world is warming because they are «biased» in some way politically or otherwise.

Even if it could be shown that climate is more sensitive to solar variability than the strict radiative forcing would suggest (along the lines of Shindell et al) one would still have to contend with the fact that we know the solar variability for the past fifty years quite well, and it does not do the kind of things necessary to give the present warming pattern.

The interesting thing about that, is that it suggests that the true conclusions might even be stronger than their already quite strong conclusions, regarding the unprecedented nature of recent warming.

This of course doesn't mean that anyone is right to pooh - pooh the whole global warming thing but it does suggest that some of its noisier supporters are overselling it and are as irrational and uninformed as those they demonize.

Theory certainly suggests that a warmer atmosphere as a result of higher CO2 concentrations will emit photons more frequently — and more of these will by chance find a path to space restoring the conditional equilibrium between ingoing and outgoing radiation — the condition being that all other things remain equal.

That suggests that a little warming might be a very good thing, and that this is not the best of all possible worlds.

The inertia of the system implies momentum (actually the same thing in physics) and suggests that even if we ceased to warm the oceans, the effects of the warmer ocean will persis long after.

Reputable studies have suggested that the whole thing wouldn't cost very much, either: To offset the warming caused by all current CO2 emissions would require an outlay of at most $ 100 billion dollars per year.

In 1990, two years after NASA scientist James E. Hansen issued his now famous warning about climate change during a congressional hearing, Lindzen started taking a publicly contrarian stance when he challenged then - senator Gore by suggesting in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society that the case for human - induced global warming was overstated and that natural climate variability could explain things just as easily.

The volcanic CO2 may make things warmer via the greenhouse but that slowly increases the speed at which weathering removes the CO2, suggesting a balancing act.

The San Diego County businessman has said he's not convinced that people cause climate change and has suggested that a warmer planet might not be such a bad thing.

Despite all those cooling cycles, BEST tries to fool us into thinking it's been getting warmer by coloring the cycles RED, which of course suggests hot, and then drawing a skyrocketing line through the whole thing in the color GREEN to suggest temperature has accelerated like a dragster driven by a spoiled teen age punk.

I remember reading many contrarian arguments that some tree rings were not equal all over the world suggesting that their usage is inadequate, or some country couldn't have vineyard during a certain period, but it was quite warm elsewhere therefore there is no such thing as Global Warming.

As a countermeasure I suggest making 2 key points in one comment: a) the IPCC «greenhouse effect has nothing to do with insulation at all, it is (see above) and b) to demonstrate their deceitful nature additionally by showing that their «warming insulation» message is wrong either, since insulation can keep things colder as well.

'' For example, the term «global warming» is associated with: Our findings strongly suggest that the terms global warming and climate change are used differently and mean different things in the minds of many Americans.

The IPCC * itself * acknowledges that there has been no such warming now for the last 16 - 17 years; that no dramatic imminent change is seen to that for the next couple of years at least; that the previous spell of 15 years or so was precisely the duration of warming that underlay so much of the evidence cited for its alarms of the long and terrible global trend if forecast; that not a single model the IPCC had or has seems to have come even close to predicting what we've now seen; that the IPCC can only suggest possible explanations for all this so logically meaning it can have no reason to believe that whatever is causing it isn't going to continue forever; that more and more studies are coming in attributing global temperatures not to CO2 but instead other things such as solar fluctuations; that a number of predictions are now coming in that in fact say we are now in for a lengthy period of * cooling.

In fact, combining our knowledge of human history with this figure suggests that humanity is better off when things are warmer!

As for the rest, I'd suggest you ask the denier to some work, and actually point out where in the article it states that global warming isn't happenning or isn't caused at least in large part by increasing greenhouse gas concentrations, and to be on the safe side (because things can be taken out of context), ask him / her to also quote the abstract and the conclusion.

[W] hen you suggest a carbon tax or a higher gasoline tax — initiatives that would redirect resources and change habits at the scale actually needed to impact global warming — what is the first thing you hear in Congress?