Sentences with phrase «suggested by the case»

The possibility of cellular immortality is also suggested by the case of Henrietta Lacks, an African American woman who suffered from cervical cancer and died on October 4, 1951, at Johns Hopkins Hospital at the age of 31.

Not exact matches

Reliable housing market statistics are hard to come by, but a number of private surveys of home prices in various cities now suggest at least a halt to the 20 % annual increases, and in some cases precipitous drops.

In that case, she also claims that Cohen defamed her by allegedly suggesting that Daniels is lying about the purported relationship with Trump.

While this has not always been the case, figures published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics suggest that between 1998 and 2008, the amount spent on personal care per individual soared by 54 % in the United States.

A recent post in the Guardian suggests Canadian companies that operate globally — in this particular case, e-book seller Kobo — could be hurt by so - called anti-terror measures in the same way that National Security Agency spying has negatively affected the interests of U.S. businesses abroad.

A new study by Harvard University and University of Vermont researchers suggests that just may be the case, my colleague Aric Jenkins reports.

That means that if Blackrock's fund managers responded as the research suggests, then they would cut back the number of trades by enough so that the non-tax trading costs for their $ 10,000 account would fall by roughly $ 2,300 over the course of a decade or $ 15,000 in the case of its more actively managed European fund.

Roy D. Simon, a professor emeritus of legal ethics at Hofstra University School of Law, suggested that the practice has helped «level the playing field» by providing resources for people to mount cases against big institutions that would be impossible otherwise.

In other cases, our assumptions seem driven by long - standing market practices, statutes, or regulations — suggesting that because it always has been a certain way, it must remain that way.

Heather Dietrick, Gawker's president and general counsel, presented a more hopeful view of the case to Capital, and suggested that the Florida jury would be moved by their argument that Hogan had turned his own sex life into a public spectacle long before Gawker published this tape.

That seems doomed to fail, as more than a century of case law dating back to the early days of the railroad suggests that provincial measures that directly thwart interprovincial infrastructure may be overruled by federal jurisdiction using 92 (10)(c) and this would be a prime example of when it should be (and has historically) been used.

But in this case, there seems to be a plausible and perfectly innocent explanation for the traffic pattern suggested by an IT consultant named Naadir Jeewa and endorsed by security expert Robert Graham: The Trump organization is sending out promotional emails about Trump hotels, and one or more Alfa Bank employees is on the recipient list.

The actual analytical changes imposed by the suggested unitary standard and its knowledge requirement would arise in intentional discrimination cases involving customer preferences and BFOQ claims that were not blatantly discriminatory when addressing concerns of privacy, safety, or authenticity.

But even if that were the case, and here the evidence suggests the opposite (Saskatchewan, for example, remains unmoved by Alberta's leadership), the federal government's ample constitutional power is a far simpler means of solving this collective action problem.

I suggest you read the entire article as it presents an alternative bull case not being considered by the market.

Europe's top court, the ECJ, ruled that a lower court should compare the case to a previous (failed) antitrust appeal by Intel, suggesting the lower court re-examine its decision to uphold the antitrust judgment.

When asked if he believed porn could provide a compelling use case for first - time bitcoin buyers, Meklir suggested he feels this transition is still one that will take time and won't be helped by any single use case.

Rogers supports his first contention by exemplifying his suggested way of reading and by choosing a particularly knotty case» interpreting Thomas on the natural knowledge of God by reading the first question in the Summa Theologica from Thomas» exegesis of Romans 1, instead of the other way around.

The body of every saint is to an exceptional degree a temple of the Holy Ghost, and the impressive track record of cures (affirmed by the Catechism of the Council of Trent) presumably stems from a continuing connection between the physical remains and the possibility of divine intervention.Tradition suggests that the holiness and curative possibility is much greater for primary and secondary relics, but still exists for third - class, in this case the casket.

The final feature of this work is to reflect theologically on different experiences of death according to a set structure: (1) an experience is presented using a case format; (2) the dominant theological questions raised by the case are identified; (3) the response of a typical theology of death is presented, and a response drawn from relational thought is presented; (4) practical implications are suggested.

Further, the illustration of the contemporary region of «grey» may be due to quite other efficacious historic routes — for example, to lighting effects arranged by theatrical producers — and in such a case, the term «stone» may suggest an even more violent error than In the former example.

Nearly as shameful, there is nothing in «Masters of War» that suggests that the Korean War or even World War II might be exceptions to the general case being made — that is, the attitude seems to be that even if they were necessary wars, they were necessarily conducted by bad men.

Murray Straus's studies suggest that marital violence occurs in one out of four marriages, not as a single event but as a pattern (Richard J. Gelles and Claire Pedrick Cornell, Intimate Violence in Families [Sage Publications, 1985], p. 69) The Center for the Prevention of Sexual and Domestic Violence estimates that one girl out of three and one boy out of seven are sexually abused by age 18, and that in half the cases their abusers are family members; that 1 million children are physically abused by parents or caretakers every year; and that 1 million elderly people are abused every year by their adult children.

18) The fact that there is a later punk - driven attempt to democratize rock fame (and not in the fatuous way that Andy Warhol's «15 - minutes of fame» comment suggested) or that pop / disco artists like Michael Jackson and Madonna will pick up on Bowie's fame - playing and image - emphatic example, in Madonna's case overtly subordinating the music to the prerogatives of notoriety, do not alter what ALMOST FAMOUS is showing us, that rock can be thought of as a social phenomenon / scene that one might belong to («you're too sweet for rock and roll» is said not by a musician to a musician, but by a groupie to a rock writer), that is as fame - focused as it is music - focused.

The building block electronic and protonic actual occasions are, in the case of human beings, swept into vastly more complex, Chinese box - like sets of containing societies within which there are social levels that can be identified with cells, others which answer to Aristotle's levels of tissues and organs, and which finally are presided over by what Whitehead refers to as the regnant nexus, a social thread of complex temporal inheritance which, Whitehead suggests, wanders from part to part of the brain, is the seat of conscious direction of the organism as a whole, and answers to what in Plato and Aristotle is called the soul.

As for the resurrection, may I suggest reading The Case for the Resurrection by Gary Habermas.

But although Francis did not give these Catholics an automatic pass, he suggested that bishops and priests could do so case by case, with the couples» «well - formed» consciences as the guide.

The importance of MacIntyre's argument about intelligible action is suggested by the problems he must confront to sustain his case.

The former is the case with some poetic approaches which suggest that God could have saved us by a pin - prick in the hand of Christ and so in fact did something more than rationally required.

What is briefly suggested here has to be sure no application to Abraham in case one might think it possible to find out by analogy an appropriate word for Abraham to end with, but it does apply to this extent, that one thereby perceives how necessary it is that Abraham at the last moment must carry himself through, must not silently draw the knife, but must have a word to say, since as the father of faith he has absolute significance in a spiritual sense.

In those latter comments, Rusty says he feels chastened by a reader's letter to the effect that, contrary to what Rusty may have suggested in the initial column, it is «indeed the case today that free market libertarians are the most likely people to dismiss the role of authority in human flourishing.»

The classic case reported by Robert Lindner in The Fifty Minute Hour of the psychiatrist who is caught up in his patient's delusions about the cosmos, suggests the depths as well as dangers of what is happening.

Under the test, first proposed by Supreme Court Justice Sandra O'Connor in a 1984 case from Pawtucket, Rhode Island, a display violates the Establishment Clause if it amounts to an official endorsement of religion, that is, if it suggests that the government approves a particular religious message (or disapproves such a message, though that issue does not regularly arise).

It also reprises some themes from Smith's earlier books, including the case for postmodernism as an ally of Christianity rather than as a threat, and skepticism about the value of straightforward apologetics — with Taylor, he suggests that the genre diminishes religion by reducing it to just another «closed» set of propositions in an age that prizes storytelling and fluidity.

More precisely, Craighead has violated a corollary of Hartshorne's perceptual rule, which might be termed the «principle of conceptual limitation,» by claiming to conceive of a pure absence or negation which could not have been derived from or suggested by any possible case of perception.

Highly publicized reactions to science and social science on the part of religious conservatives, as evidenced by lawsuits concerning the teaching of evolution in public schools and court cases challenging the influence of «secular humanism» on school textbooks, suggest that Habermas's forces of «secular rationality» have by no means carried the day.

If this happened in the face of a victory as complete as Islam's over Arabia, how much more would such syncretism take place when, as in Israel's case in Palestine, the Canaanites could not be utterly conquered but, sustained and empowered, so current beliefs would suggest, by their native gods, lived on with the Israelites!

While the characteristics mentioned in the previous section dominate in the audience of religious television programs, evidence suggests that these programs are watched on occasion and in some cases regularly by non - Protestants, non-evangelicals, those of higher income and education, those in white - collar occupations, and those who claim no religious interest or church affiliation.

Even if you have problems with the phrasing that Christine used, to try and suggest that she was lying about what the scripture said by phrasing it a little differently than the way you understood it (or misunderstood it as the case may be) is utterly ridiculous and unfounded.

If you are interested in a very educated and philiosophical case on the topic may I suggest you read «Guide for the Perplexed» by Moses Maimonides.

But there have been many historical cases in which rules of correspondence were suggested by analogies between observations.

No further action is now to be taken though, after further investigations by the authority suggested that the case should be dropped.

I decided, that buckwheat flour is too expensive, so I did this by myself from buckwheat groats In this case I suggest to use closed mill: blender or similar.

Unconscionable conduct (agrees with NFF that they have not provided protection and support reforms «to provide transparency in the supply chain» and recognise that «certain classes of suppliers... are predisposed to suffering from a special disadvantage...»; misuse of market power (legal framework must «level the balance of market power in negotiations...», «ensure transparency in the transmission of market prices» and «not allow for final market risks to be borne by the primary producer» and provide «transparency of contract processes» - specifically, Canegrowers supports effects test and a process giving ACCC greater power to «regulate anti-competitive behaviour and impose penalties», shifting «the decisions framework from the judicial system to a regulatory system» which would make it more accessible to small producers); collective bargaining (notes limits of Sugar Industry Act (Qld); authorisation and notification approval costly and limited and not a viable alternative - peak bodies should be able to «commence and progress collective bargaining with mills on behalf of their members» and current threshold too restrictive)» competitive neutrality (mixed outcomes - perverse outcomes in the case of natural monopolies - suggest remove «application of competitive neutrality provisions to natural monopoly essential services»)

if thats the case regarding Coquelin then i would suggest that we aren't going to buy a defensive midfielder at all, especially if Arteta and Flamini stay, i think this is a mistake, but Wenger made our bed by not releasing these 2

If your happy with the situation then by all means be happy and keep hoping that the club will win things, I would suggest that if that's the case your likely to be suffering from a severe bout of disappointment for a very long time.

Despite the football media in England trying to suggest that the Chilean flying out of London the day after the Champions League disaster was down to something else, the club revealed that his time off was all planned and was brought on by the striker having to go to Spain to deal with his involvement in a tax fraud case.

The report suggests this will put United off following up their interest, so mission accomplished by Leicester if that is the case.

But in his pre-match press conference reported by Arsenal.com the Frenchman suggested that the opposite would be the case.

players like Ozil always present the fans with a bit of a conundrum, especially when times are tough... if you look around the sporting world every once in awhile there emerges a player with incredible skill, like Ozil, Matt Sundin or even Jay Cutler, who have a different way about themselves... their movement seemed almost too lackadaisical, so much so that it seemed to suggest indifference or even disinterest on the part of the player... their posture always appears somewhat mopey and they generally have an unflattering «sour puss» expression on their face... for some their above average skills are enough to keep them squarely in the mix, as their respective teams try desperately to find a way to get the best out of them visa vie player acquisitions or the reworking of tactics... when things go according to planned the fans usually find a way to accept their unique disposition, whereas when things go awry they become easy targets for fans and pundits alike... in the case of Ozil and Sundin, their successes on the international stage and / or with their former teams led many to conclude that if we surrounded such talented individuals with players that have those skills that would most likely bring the best of these players success would surely follow... unfortunately both the Maple Leafs and our club chose to adopt half - measures, as each were being run by corporations who valued profitability over providing the best possible product on the field... for them, they cared more about shirt sales and season tickets than doing whatever was necessary... this isn't, by any stretch, an attempt to absolve Ozil of any responsibility for his failures on the pitch... there is no doubt oftentimes his efforts were underwhelming, to say the least, but this club has been inept when it comes to providing this prolific passer with the kind of players necessary for him to flourish... with our poor man's version of Benzema up front, the headless chickens in Walcott, the younger Ox and Welbeck occupying wide positions far too often and the fact that Carzola, who provided Ozil with great service and more freedom to roam, was never truly replaced, the only real skilled outlet on the pitch was Sanchez... remember to be considered a world - class set - up man goals need to be scored and for much of his time here he has been surrounded by some incredibly inept finishers... in the end, I'm not sure how long he will be in North London, recent sentiments and his present contract situation seem to suggest that he will depart at season's end, but how tragic would it be if once again we didn't put our best foot forward and failed to make those moves that could have brought championship football back to our once beloved club... so when you think about this uniquely skilled player don't be so quick to shift all the blame on his shoulders because he will not be the first or the last highly skilled player to find disappointment at the Emirates if we don't rid the club of those individuals that are truly to blame for our current woes