Not exact matches
Paleoanthropologists have disproven the basic premise that the
modern human digestive system
is the same as that of early
humans, but research also
suggests that a diet of unprocessed, hormone - free meat sources coupled with fresh fruits and vegetables has clear benefits.
Not only does this
suggest modern humans might have
been stepping tentatively into Europe and getting friendly with Neanderthals long before the wave of migration that led to today's population, it shows Neanderthals
were more diverse than we thought.
Heidegger's presentation of the possibilities of
human existence
suggests that they
are applicable to man as such, and not, say, only to
modern European man.
I have
suggested elsewhere that value - free technology, the military - industrial complex, and narrow nationalism might
be modern examples of such principalities and powers.9 Hendrikus Berkhof
suggests that
human traditions, astrology, fixed religious rules, clans, public opinion, race, class, state, and Volk
are among the powers.10 Walter Wink sees the powers as the inner aspects of institutions, their «spirituality,» the inner spirit or driving force that animates, legitimates, and regulates their outward manifestations.11 They
are «the invisible forces that determine
human existence «12 When such things dehumanize
human life, thwart and distort the
human spirit, block God's gift of shalom, the followers of Jesus
are rallied for a new kind of holy war.
YOU seem to
be suggesting that these
modern concepts of
human rights
are leading us away from God and to hell, a belief that makes you a perfect example of why more and more people
are rejecting Christianity!
Our
modern conviction that
human beings and their mentality have evolved through long ages from simpler and still simpler natural forms also
suggests that there
is some family connection between
human experience and the entities of the natural world.
If the horrors of the
modern age
suggest that
human evil
is perhaps even more awful in its reach than he imagined, it
is also the case that there
is a broadly shared
human revulsion against such evil.
A new, slightly morbid study based on the calorie counts of average
humans suggests that
human - eating
was mostly ritualistic, not dietary, in nature among hominins including Homo erectus, H. antecessor, Neandertals, and early
modern humans.
VANCOUVER — Traces of long - lost
human cousins may
be hiding in
modern people's DNA, a new computer analysis
suggests.
Blombos Cave, South Africa: Dated to about 100,000 years ago, ochre - processing «tool kits» and other artifacts found at the site — including an engraved piece of ochre, the oldest known art of its type —
suggest early
humans were capable of
modern, complex behaviors much earlier than once thought.
Most scientists thought that the capability for such symbolic thinking
was unique to
modern humans, but a new study
suggests that it dates back to before the Neandertals.
Brown
suggests that forging tools
was part of a «behavioural tool kit» that allowed the first
modern humans to conquer the world.
«Our data show this process
was ongoing two and a half million years ago, which allows us to consider a very drawn - out and gradual evolution of the
modern human capacity for language and
suggests simple «proto - languages» might
be older than we previously thought,» Morgan added.
«These results
are tantalizingly close to the earliest evidence for
modern humans in the region, which might
suggest a causal link to the subsequent disappearance of H. floresiensis,» Higham adds.
Dueling genetic studies based on the DNA of
modern dogs and wolves
suggest the fellowship between
humans and dogs could have
been forged in the Middle East, Central Asia, East Asia or, as Goyet's archaeological evidence
suggests, in Europe.
This
suggests strongly that there
was an extensive overlapping period between Neanderthals and
modern humans of several thousand years.
The authors
suggest that
human activity may even
be driving a similar Lilliput - like pattern in the
modern world, as more and more large animals go extinct because of hunting, habitat destruction, and climate change.
The authors of the study, an international team from Portuguese, Spanish, Catalonian, German, Austrian and Italian research institutions, say their findings
suggest that the process of
modern human populations absorbing Neanderthal populations through interbreeding
was not a regular, gradual wave - of - advance but a «stop - and - go, punctuated, geographically uneven history.»
«Several letters [from the Association of American Medical Colleges and others]...
suggest that
human fetal tissue
is used for
modern vaccine production.
This
suggests one obvious conclusion, says Shannon McPherron at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany: «Neanderthals
were being influenced by the
modern humans.»
They found that the Neanderthal genome shows more similarity with non-African
modern humans throughout Europe and Asia than with African
modern humans,
suggesting that the gene flow between us and Neanderthals most likely occurred outside Africa as
humans were en route to Europe, Asia, and New Guinea.
Some
suggested Flo
was a diseased
modern human, related to pygmies but suffering from a condition like microcephaly, which causes the brain and head to
be pathologically small.
«None of the species that have
been previously
suggested as the last common ancestor of Neanderthals and
modern humans has a dental morphology that
is fully compatible with the expected morphology of this ancestor,» Gómez - Robles said.
«No known hominin
is common ancestor of Neanderthals and
modern humans, study
suggests.»
Even ordinary studies of
human physiology, for example,
suggest that
humans are so adapted for intense physical activity that a sedentary lifestyle spawns
modern - day scourges like diabetes and heart disease.
If so, and if, as the team's estimates
suggest, the variant became established in the
human population during the last 200,000 years of
human history — roughly the time at which anatomically
modern humans arose — the gift of gab may have
been a driving force in their expansion.
The fossil record and
modern genetic analysis
suggest that
humans and all other living species
are descended from bacteria - like microbes that first appeared about 4 billion years ago.
People from mainland Asia and west Indonesia didn't have any though,
suggesting they
are descendants of a second wave of
modern humans across Asia — this time without Denisovan interbreeding.
THE Denisovans, mysterious cousins of the Neanderthals, occupied a vast realm stretching from the chill expanse of Siberia to the steamy tropical forests of Indonesia —
suggesting the third
human of the Pleistocene displayed a level of adaptability previously thought to
be unique to
modern humans.
Neanderthal remains
are occasionally associated with such symbolic artifacts, but those pale in comparison with the artifacts produced by early
modern humans,
suggesting a significant gap in linguistic abilities.
Several dating techniques applied to archaeological materials and the fossil itself
suggest the jawbone
is between 175,000 - 200,000 years old, pushing back the
modern human migration out of Africa by at least 50,000 years.
The new tooth also contains DNA unlike that of Neandertals or
modern humans,
suggesting that Denisovans interbred with an even more mysterious branch of the
human family tree — one that
is either unknown to science, or known only from fossils without preserved DNA.
Some archaeologists have
suggested that they
were absorbed into the population of
modern humans.
In an analysis of the remarkably complete hands, paleoanthropologist Tracy Kivell of the University of Kent in the United Kingdom found that bones in the wrist
were shaped like those in
modern humans,
suggesting that the palm at the base of the thumb
was quite stiff.
This has
suggested that female
modern humans and male Neandertals
were not fully compatible and that male Neandertals may have had problems with sperm production.
One hypothesis
suggests that Neandertals
were rigid in their dietary choice, targeting large herbivorous mammals, such as horse, bison and mammoths, while
modern humans also exploited a wider diversity of dietary resources, including fish.
An analysis of a Neanderthal Y chromosome
suggests human hybrids containing it would have
been unviable, and explain why it
is not found in
modern humans
In addition, some of the oldest Flores remains date back before
modern humans were thought to
be in the area, which
suggests that Flores Man
was a distinct species.
DNA from Denisovans
suggests they lived in Siberia for millennia and
were more genetically diverse than Neandertals, but less diverse than
modern humans
The researchers caution that it
's impossible to draw broad conclusions about Neandertal life histories from this one sample, such as whether Neandertals weaned their children earlier or later than
modern humans who lived at the same time, or whether Neandertal children grew up faster, as some earlier studies have
suggested — questions that could heavily bear on why Neandertals could not keep up with
modern humans in the survival sweepstakes.
Neanderthal (top) and reindeer (bottom) jawbones from the Les Rois cave show similar cut marks (details at right),
suggesting that both
were butchered by
modern humans.
But two new papers
suggest that they
were at home on both the land and the sea: Studies of ancient and
modern human DNA, including the first reported ancient DNA from early Middle Eastern farmers, indicate that agriculture spread to Europe via a coastal route, probably by farmers using boats to island hop across the Aegean and Mediterranean seas.
The Atapuerca team
suggests that the bones
be reclassified as a new, still unnamed species that
was the immediate ancestor of Neandertals, but not
modern humans.
This curious pattern
suggests several possible scenarios, including that male Denisovans interbred with female
modern humans, or that these unions
were genetically incompatible, with natural selection weeding out some of the X chromosomes, Reich says.
He and his colleagues argue that today's better understanding of the pace of evolution,
human adaptability and the way the mind works all
suggest that, contrary to cartoon stereotypes,
modern humans are not just primitive savages struggling to make psychological sense of an alien contemporary world.
The DNA data
suggest not one but at least two instances of interbreeding between archaic and
modern humans, raising the question of whether Homo sapiens at that point
was a distinct species (see sidebar).
The dates, based on new excavations and state - of - the - art methods, push back the earliest solid evidence for
humans in Australia by 10,000 to 20,000 years and
suggest that
modern humans left Africa earlier than had
been thought.
Earlier dating work by Lepre and Kent helped lead to another landmark paper in 2011: a study that
suggested Homo erectus, another precursor to
modern humans,
was using more advanced tool - making methods 1.8 million years ago, at least 300,000 years earlier than previously thought.
The discovery
suggests that Denisovans
were widely across Asia, and apparently co-existed happily with
modern humans, to the point of having children with them in two different parts of the ancient world.
It
's no surprise then that a study published 2 years ago created quite a stir by claiming that
modern humans harbor a genetic signature
suggesting our ancestors engaged heavily in the practice.