Finally, a Study Guide offers four text screen lessons with
suggested points of discussion and fitting film clips to support them.
Not exact matches
This last
point is
suggested in a number
of Peirce's
discussions, particularly in his accounts
of the function
of the sciences (see, for instance, 1.191) as well as in his references to the goal
of rational conduct which is the summum bonum (e.g., 5.4 - 5, 5.433).
The books by Murray and the Schorrs are fairly representative
of the current state
of the
discussion, the first
pointing to numerous program failures and
suggesting the wastefulness and positive harm
of government intervention overall; the second
pointing to specific successes, and arguing for the necessity and feasibility
of expanded government action building on them.
Focussing on the notion
of prehension as the basis
of a concept
of «shared existence,» Cobb stresses the possibility»
of an «ecological theology» to counter the Kantian overemphasis on the human
point of view.8 A fuller
discussion of Whitehead's ecological dimension is to be found in an article by John B. Bennet.9 Bennet
suggests three possible sources
of Whitehead's value to ecological thinking.
Oddly, and unfortunately, in various
discussions Whitehead seems to
suggest that any novelty is in itself desirable, as if, from the
point of view
of value, novelty were self - validating (whatever that may mean).
While I would prefer accurate information regarding midwifery, a more thorough
discussion of breastfeeding, and a bit
of editing regarding the few
points above, this book is certainly one I am happy to include in our practice's lending library and will likely
suggest it to my pregnant daughter as a resource she may enjoy.
Experts say there is an animated technical and financial
discussion already under way around the North Sea grid, including whether it is even desirable given the complications
of where to place the grid connections and substations involved as well as some calculations that
suggest development
of a grid would be more expensive than simple
point - to -
point connections.
Each lesson plan contains an overview, a step - by - step guide to the activity, an explanation
of the science behind the experiment, sample
discussion questions and talking
points, a downloadable teacher's guide, student worksheets or handouts, and
suggested variations.
A lithe, playful exercise that at
points suggests a Gallic My Dinner with Andre, Cavalier's film stars the director himself and the redoubtable French leading man Vincent Lindon as both themselves and, respectively, as the President and Prime Minister
of France — a role - playing game they slip in and out
of at will, and which fuels a free - flowing
discussion of food, globalization, national pride, and neckwear couture.
I was recently in a Facebook
discussion about how to get a movie ticket cheap and someone
suggested applying for the SCENE Visa for the sign - up bonus
of 2000 SCENE
points.
Coming back to the main
point, if you want to continue the dispute over the conclusion that the weather is, as I said at the start
of all this, getting hotter and drier [as we have discovered in the
discussion, as a result
of higher evaporation as well as lower rainfall], I
suggest you move the
discussion to the thread on «Drying out».
With respect, may I
suggest that until you convince the population and governments
of India and China (for a start) that there is a PROBABLE repeat PROBABLE likelyhood
of AGW and thus facilitate the possibility
of them coming on board in terms
of actual, physical and verifiable emission reductions — only then is there any
point in taking this
discussion further to «settle» the science and derive a solution that actually works.
You've clearly missed a lot but the tone
of your comments
suggests there'd be no
point discussion the subject with you.
Taking a neutral stance at this
point on work from «NIPCC» (Fred Singer et al.),
suggesting that this kind
of effort «competes» with the work
of several
of the world's climate scientists and a large number
of multidisciplinary specialists contributing to IPCC reports combined with the additional scientists and many others who raise real questions that result from reading, reviewing, evaluating and evolving the information in both IPCC summaries and domestic science and
discussion of the science, is just not credible, in my humble opinion.
Taking a neutral stance at this
point on rehashed work from «NIPCC» (Fred Singer and friends), well known for serial, serious errors in overall interpretation, analysis and communication
of the science and transparent but largely unexamined ideological bias at play in their playground «reports» — never mind
suggesting that this kind
of effort «competes» with the work
of the world's climate scientists and the 2,500 multidisciplinary specialists contributing to IPCC reports combined with the tens
of thousands
of additional scientists and many others who raise real questions that result from reading, reviewing, evaluating and evolving the information in both IPCC summaries and domestic science and
discussion of the science, knowledgeably and in good faith and with open identification
of the nature
of the social and political issues — is just not credible.
In the light
of the
discussions in this thread about the history
of science, I
point out that my
suggested «way forward» has precedent with Halley's prediction
of when a comet would return after the end
of his lifetime.
These examples
of uses
of zombie texts
suggest possibilities within the established curriculum, distilling lessons and
discussion points relative to doctrines and procedures from a popular literary narrative.