Not exact matches
After 44 such responses (including two instances in which Redstone blurted out «I don't remember» before the IRS lawyer had even finished asking her
question), the judge finally interrupted and
suggested to the government attorney that her queries were futile: «I don't think you — he's not going to be able to
give you anything.»
Because of the wide range of purchases associated with travel spending, we
suggest you call an Ultimate Rewards representative whenever you have a
question of whether a
given transaction will earn you double points.
Hold on there Mister... We know there was a big bang... we are not sure IF it was the origin of everything
given they are now
suggesting multi-verses... so this also expands the
question.
It is
giving a command to God's people not to
question and to kill anyone who is even
suggesting that you should serve another faith.
Santayana's definition
suggests the best answer I can
give to that
question: in practice, in fact, in life, I find myself still loving life in the consciousness of impotence.
The fact that he can grant this yet not
give such possibility a greater place in his narrative
suggests that, with respect to the
question of the relation between politics and ethics at least, Taylor is not at all a modem, however much he may believe that the modem identity brings with it some genuine goods.
Here is a
question to ponder: If, as Professor Amar insists, that clause incorporated the Bill of Rights and
gave us the modern conception of individual liberty, does he wish to
suggest that it would also justify the result in Roe v. Wade?
I mentioned above that, on Whitehead's view, which alternatives were more relevant for a
given conceptually reverted feeling is a
question not decided by the category of reversion, and I
suggested the provision of equilibrium to decide such matters.
I was not
suggesting that it would be acceptable for (the real) God to do this, because,
given the understanding of God held by process theists, the
question does not arise.
No reason at all, for I am not
suggesting that there is actually a final philosophical system — e.g. idealism, and Hegelianism in particular — or that it is necessary for our exegesis to take over the actual answers that philosophy
gives to the existential
question of the meaning of my own particular existence.
This is an incredibly difficult
question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that
suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long,
gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense
given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will
give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even
suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
They could use a boost in scoring output without
question, but their defence has been doing well enough to
suggest that they could
give United a frustrating afternoon on the south coast.
Given the conflicting findings on this
question, I
suggest some caution in jumping to one or the other conclusion.
Anyway, I'm writing today to see if you feel like tackling a slightly off - topic
question: what to do about Halloween??? Someone has
suggested giving away small toys instead of candy.
With nagging
questions over the leadership of the Buffalo Public School District, and some
suggesting full mayoral control is the answer, a Buffalo - area state senator has drafted compromise legislation that would
give the mayor «input.»
John Curtice explains the contradiction: «Our willingness to
give contradictory responses to survey
questions about electoral systems
suggests that relatively few of us have thought through the trade - offs involved the choice of an electoral system or have firm views on the subject.»
In response to James»
question about the Labour leadership candidates — Ed Miliband campaigned for Simon Hughes to speak out & is encouraging his supporters to call on the Lib Dems to stand up for their values, David Miliband has
suggested ending the charitable status of fee - paying schools and (one of those non-monetary aspects to reducing inequality)
giving representation to ordinary workers on corporate remunertion committees, Ed Balls has strongly opposed the VAT rise and is calling for a graduate tax instead of higher tuition fees, Andy Burnham has reiterated his support for a National Care Service and spoken out on the abolition of the Future Jobs Fund, Diane Abbot has called for fair taxation, cancelling Trident, and setting a timetable for troop withdrawal from Afghanistan.
The Speccy's James Forsyth
suggests it is not out of the
question,
given May's stance on freedom of movement:
In answer to the
question «how should «worker» status be defined», LITRG
suggested to BEIS that everyone be
given «worker» status unless it can be shown that they are genuinely self - employed.
It's
suggesting that it be
given the final say over the wording of the eventual
question which will be put to Scottish voters.
As far as I can recall the last proper ComRes poll of London voting intentions was in March (there was one that asked which candidate people were inclined to support in September, but it was a small sample and wasn't really comparable), and showed Ken very narrowly ahead, so this
suggests a move towards Boris though,
given the difference in the
question now that other candidates are known, I wouldn't read too much into that.
«The controversial hedge fund manager who
gave # 500,000 to the Tories faced
questions about his tax status last night after official records
suggested that he is resident in Switzerland.
The
question is prompted in part by birth defects that produce a cyclopean eye,
suggesting that a single structure
gives rise to two eyes.
The virtual job interview and help sheet on interview technique both look behind common interview
questions and
suggest strategies for
giving the answers employers are looking for.
Meanwhile, some scientists were
questioning what they viewed as a default assumption that one must prove that a
given storm is influenced by climate change — seeking to flip the
question and, instead,
suggest that all storms today are so influenced.
The latter statement is vague and
suggests that teachers know how to differentiate but have decided not to do so, while the former statement promotes inquiry and thought — it is written as a
question and
gives teachers a clearer idea of possible instructional shifts.
Have students practice divergent thinking by describing an issue in the community and asking them to
suggest all the people who could be affected by it, or
give students a «big idea»
question and ask them to think of all the possible answers to it.
Their decisions do not change when they are
given the opportunity to compare costs and benefits,
suggesting no reason to
question the rationality of their preferences.
The
question of interdependence versus modularity
suggests that devices like Chromebooks will
give closed - architecture devices tough competition in the years ahead and continue to steal market share.
The National Education Association also
suggests creating a speakers bureau with teachers and parents who are prepared to
give interviews, field
questions on call - in shows and make presentations to community groups on partnership activities.
When preparing for A Level Psychology some of the most crucial preparation is practice and this resource
gives realistic, challenging and invaluable
suggested questions.
Invite parents to ask
questions and
give them a platform to
suggest goals they have for their child.
Using extended examples from different grade levels, Lalor advises teachers to use a three - part protocol to
give feedback on student work: (1) emphasize the strengths in the work; (2) discuss
questions or problems about the work in relation to the specific assignment; and (3)
suggest «next steps» for improving the work.
The book
suggests teachers hang four pieces of poster paper (one for each compass point) up in the classroom, and then students are
given sticky notes to write their answers to the
questions on each compass point.
The example
suggested that if students do not know the meaning of a particular word in a test item, they would be taught to replace it with an «X» and focus instead on grasping the logic of the
question phrasing that will
give them a better chance of selecting the correct answer.
Ji,, y —
suggest you
give them a wee call and pose them the «hypothetical»
question.
The experts at Effective Coverage can ask the right
questions to help you determine the coverage you need, as well as
suggest specific holes in any
given situation that you might want to plug with an endorsement.
Once you've answered all the
questions, it will
give you a quick rundown of what assets and allocation that they would
suggest for you, in both a taxable account and retirement account.
You can always post back with another
question that
gives us more details so that we can
suggest tradeoffs.
So my
question is this; how do you
suggest I get started in real estate investing,
given the situation of needing my own home?
Another 23 % were unsure how a rate hike would affect them — which
suggests they haven't
given this crucial
question enough thought.
A local professional can answer your
questions,
suggest coverage options, and
give you free competitive Houston ATV insurance quotes.
A couple of
questions regarding feeding Frenchies: 1) If feeding a vitamin supplement as
suggested in the recipes section, is it OK to
give the shed med, too?
Hi there Im afraid we do nt have that information and there is nothing on the website to
give the answer either, I would
suggest you emailing the hotel directly to ask the
question regards
There is no
question that cutscenes are far more disruptive to the immersive experience than the «amusement park ride,» but it
gives storytellers a chance to inject drama into the story, direct the player's eye to specific places, and largely
suggest the feelings the player should be experiencing at that moment in time.
Cartography of Control
questions a purely mathematical description of our world and
suggests that just as different maps can
give different accounts of the same territory, so can different forms of knowledge reflect a more truthful image about the material world.
Yet, more importantly, this exhibition
gives deep insight into the practice of a unique and thoughtful artist who still invites the
question that Taylor
suggested for his gravestone and that inspired Rook's title: «What are you looking at?»
However
given his slavish devotion and outright hostility to anyone who dares
question the religion of Mann Made Global Warming ™ it
suggests his leaving Boeing at 31 wasn't for career advancement?
Given (1), the
question is, is there any recorded data in these graphs that even
suggest there is an excessive ice loss, whether man - made or natural, and the answer must be a resounding «NO»!
Thus in answer to your
question of what ceiling would avoid «the worst outcomes» I'd
suggest that
given the application of Geo - E in 2025 by the collective decision of UN member states, after a decade of RD&D stringently supervised by a mandated UN scientific agency, we'd have a very good chance of peaking SAT warming at around 1.25 C, and bring it to zero before 2030.