A study
suggesting climate change deniers also tend to hold general beliefs in conspiracy theories has sparked accusations of a conspiracy on climate change - denial blogs.
Not exact matches
Left - leaning blogs and sites like ThinkProgress and Huffington Post jumped on Rubio's comments, with the Zack Beauchamp from ThingProgress writing, «To
suggest we can't know how old the Earth is, then, is to
deny the validity of these scientific methods altogether — a maneuver familiar to Rubio, who also
denies the reality of anthropogenic
climate change.»
With
climate change deniers saying the cold temperatures contradicted the idea of global warming and some
climate scientists
suggesting that cold extremes could have a counterintuitive warming link, researchers wondered, «how can we reconcile this idea of global warming with these really extreme cold temperatures?»
I don't think anyone
denies that the sun matters for
climate, but the question is whether the variability of the sun in recent history has had the impact that we project from greenhouse gases over the next 100 — and there, I think, a majority of your «AGW» ers» would think the evidence
suggests that
changes in human forcing will likely be several times (at least) larger than any solar variability we've seen in a thousand years or more.
Flato
suggests that since Crikey doesn't think
climate change is real that perhaps he does not also subscribe to the «theory» of evolution either, which the author
denies.
The following is offered as a general and basic answer to those who
deny the need to act on
climate change as the scientific evidence
suggests.
I offer the following as a general and basic answer to those who
deny the need to act on
climate change as the scientific evidence
suggests.
But an editorial cartoon published Tuesday in Pennsylvania - based PennLive.com
suggests such «idiotic behaviors» is the same as if you
deny «human - caused
climate change.»
In any case, as much as I would like anthropogenic
climate change / global warming /
climate destabilization (or however you want to brand it) to be the grand conspiracy that
deniers like to
suggest it is, I have yet to read any credible, compelling evidence that stands up to a little investigation, including this blog post.
Yet the pre - amble / background to the survey, that includes the statement that skeptics «are doubtful that
climate change is occurring»,
suggests prominent sceptics like myself and Nicola Scafetta
deny such a reality.
In retrospect this is a little ironic — for it is guilty of the very crime it accuses the «alarmists» of perpetrating — unsupported, biased views of
climate change science which distort any kind of balanced analysis being undertaken by focusing exclusively on the
suggested polarity of existing
climate change debate — «scientists» v
deniers.
«Words uncovered by our analysis
suggest that responses to
climate change news are predominately from
climate change activists rather than
climate change deniers,» the authors write in the study, «indicating that Twitter is a valuable resource for the spread of
climate change awareness.»
To
suggest that coastlines aren't quite as perilous as green activists claim, that the government shouldn't be picking winners, or that cheaper energy might be more helpful to poor people than mitigating
climate change was to «deny science», and to be victim of some horrific right wing ideology that would make Hitler's crimes against humanity look like a summer picnic... Climate sceptics were inviting certai
climate change was to «
deny science», and to be victim of some horrific right wing ideology that would make Hitler's crimes against humanity look like a summer picnic...
Climate sceptics were inviting certai
Climate sceptics were inviting certain doom.
As his resume
suggests, Goulder is by no means a
climate change «
denier» or even an opponent of carbon taxes.
The Daily Briefing, last year,
suggested adding
climate -
change deniers to Holocaust
deniers on the list of persons prosecutable for crimes committed by expressing certain ideas in speech or writing.
The evidence strongly
suggests those most likely to
deny anthropogenic
climate change are conservative males in countries that rely heavily on fossil fuels.
Harrison has even
suggested that
climate change is a tool for people who are trying to increase the size of government — though he does not
deny that he has been to the moon and back.
Given their answers on the previous survey, this
suggests there are many Democrats who don't know what's causing
climate change but still believe humans are responsible for it, and many Republicans who do know yet still
deny that humans play a role.