Even as Copenhagen looms, broadcast news ignores e-mails
suggesting warming alarmists «manipulated» data, conspired to destroy information and thwarted peer reviews
Not exact matches
So I take it that the consensus view is that according to our best current scientific understanding, there is no possibility whatsoever of any catastrophic consequences of anthropogenic global
warming; therefore to use the word «catastrophic» is irresponsible alarmism;, and therefore the deniers are actually quite right to accuse anyone who
suggests that such outcomes are possible of being an irresponsible
alarmist.
The Little Ice Age is troublesome for global -
warming alarmists, since historical evidence
suggests the period had extremely low global temperatures, which began recovering only as recently as the mid-19th century.
If ocean oscillations are as powerful a climate driver as the anti-CO2
alarmists claim then this graph
suggests a simple story: that cold Pacific surface waters swallowed up a big gulp of warmth from 1940 - 1970, which the PDO then belched back up during its
warm - phase in the 80s and 90s.
However, the actual data
suggests that the AGW
alarmists have consistently over estimated the effect of CO2 induced
warming.
In brief, allow me to illustrate how I
suggest that your preservation letter effort — if it has not already — be extended to include Greenpeace, particular former members of Greenpeace USA, Al Gore, and global
warming alarmist book authors Naomi Oreskes and Ross Gelbspan (note: I have sent a basically identical email alert to Exxon via their generic online contact form).
But
suggesting no climate doom for Emperor Penguins threatened Mielser's «precious» beliefs and like so many
alarmists, Miesler refuses to accept any documented facts that «global
warming» is neither global nor harmful.
Then, in keeping with the global
warming alarmist playbook, they
suggested I disclose who my funders are.
Like so many
alarmists, any climate scientist who has
suggested CO2
warming has been detrimental to wildlife becomes «Precious» to Miesler.
I
suggest that our track record to date is infinitely superior to that of the global
warming alarmists including the IPCC, who have been wrong in all their very - scary predictions.
For his part, Taylor dismisses «
alarmist propaganda that global
warming is a human - caused problem that needs to be addressed,» and
suggests that taking action to reduce emissions could cause a return to the «the Little Ice Age and the Black Death.»
As Myron observed, «The vilification of me and several other climate realists during a meeting of tens of thousands of
alarmists suggests they are worried that a handful of people speaking the truth, threatens the so - called consensus that global
warming is a crisis.»