As a recent paper explained: «Mass
suits against technology customers have become too common, involving building block technologies like wi - fi, scanning, email and website technologies.»
Not exact matches
Earlier this month, Minneapolis - based law firm Nichols Kaster filed
suits against American Century's $ 600 million plan and the $ 1.3 billion plan at Fujitsu
Technology and Business of America, Inc..
The OverDrive integration will allow for the checkout of ebooks from within Millennium or Sierra without jumping to the OverDrive interface; the June rollout of Decision Center, the company's new data - driven collection management tool that will compete with collectionHQ's product; a wave of hiring backed by the new investors, which has already increased the staff by 20 so far this year and will add another 40 by the end of the year (mostly in development and support), according to Massana, pushing the company past 400 employees; the creation of five «library relations managers» who serve as customer advocates at III; the complete integration of SkyRiver
Technology Solutions into III along with the termination of SkyRiver's
suit against OCLC on March 4.
Although
technology enables employees to work after hours,
suits like the one
against T - Mobile are cropping up more frequently because of the recession.
Creative
Technology, based in Singapore, on Monday filed
suit against Apple Computer over patent claims.
Among the firm's most significant results were wins on behalf of Kleiner Perkins in a gender discrimination case brought by former partner Ellen Pao, DISH Network in its copyright fight with the four major U.S. broadcast networks, MobileIron in a patent infringement
suit against rival Good
Technology, and Broadcom in a Dodd - Frank retaliation claim brought by a former employee.
This wouldn't bar a
suit against a third - party contractor who made a defective product, but I suspect that their contracts contain a waiver of liability for negligence or defective products given that this is highly experimental
technology.
Consumer privacy is not protected under our current legal system, nor do
technology companies function in a way that protects it, said Christopher Dore, a partner at Chicago law firm Edelson, which has brought privacy
suits against tech companies, including Facebook, Google and Netflix.
The testimony that NPEs, or patent trolls, account for 88 % of all
suits filed
against technology companies is an alarm bell about abuse of the patent system.
Oracle last year came up short in the US$ 9 billion
suit it filed
against Google regarding the Java
technology used in the Android mobile operating system.
A «patent trolling» company has filed a
suit against Apple over voicemail
technology used within iPad and iPhone products.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has filed
suit in federal court
against Think Finance, a Fintech that leverages its
technology to power online lending platforms.
Not only are consumers sued for patent infringement, but recent years have seen an explosion in
suits against end - users of
technology products.