Faced with a choice between installing expensive pollution - control equipment or switching to low -
sulfur coal mined outside Illinois, power companies overwhelmingly chose the latter.
Not exact matches
Times were best when
mining wide veins of high -
sulfur, bituminous
coal close to the surface was cheap and demand was high, and worst once miners had to dig deeper and demand dropped.
Wyoming, with rich reserves of low -
sulfur coal near the surface, is the largest
coal - producing - state and has the most
coal still in the ground at producing
mines.
Instead, the company will use high -
sulfur coal —
mined mostly in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and West Virginia — and will then pull the
sulfur out as part of the CCS process.
(Don't take that as good news, because it has correspondingly lower energy content so you burn more of it as compared to higher carbon
coal like Anthracite; Powder River
coal is
mined largely because of its low
sulfur content).
The company
mines, processes, and markets bituminous and sub-bituminous
coal with low
sulfur content in the United States.
They argued that much of the EPA program's apparent success in reducing SO2 emissions from power plants was due to simultaneous railroad deregulation which reduced the cost of delivering low
sulfur coal strip -
mined in the west.
Coal mining and power production release toxic heavy metals like mercury, respiratory irritants like
sulfur dioxide and particulates, and large volumes of heat - trapping gases like carbon dioxide and methane.