Sentences with phrase «sum is in question»

Not exact matches

Maybe the question could be summed up in a succinct email instead.»

Most of the time, the questions are offered in the spirit of openness to justify the investment of such a large sum of money.

However, in order to be eligible, the client must be eligible to take a lump sum distribution from the qualified retirement plan in question (typically meaning that he or she has reached age 59 1/2, become disabled or retired, or died).

Understandably, with huge sums having been lost (and in some cases gained) in the blink of an eye, pointed questions are being asked about the sell which first triggered the process and whether it was an attempt at market manipulation.

If I were thinking about purchasing GECC's debt, I would first ask myself the following question: In the event that GECC were on the verge of a debt default and a bailout by the parent company would require a sum of money that would put undue hardship on GE, would GE guarantee GECC's debt?

In blunter terms, the question is whether the better metaphor for the economy is a rising tide that can lift all boats — or a zero - sum game.

It's a good question, especially when you stack DCA against lump - sum investing, as Vanguard did in a 2017 study.

The main tenets of this philosophy are bracingly summed up in a series of questions and answers: Is there a God?

He gives examples of complex systems of relationships that are made up of several different levels, in each case attempting to answer the question, «how is the whole greater than the sum of the parts?»

I'm answering to the question of religion preventing violence in terms of the sum total of violence — is there more or less violence with religion.

Thus, well - being could be said to derive simply from the sum of responsibilities performed in everyday life, quite apart from broader questions about the purpose of one's life.

There are short Stories: about a traveler who was robbed and lay wounded by the roadside until he was succored by a kindly stranger; about a capitalist who entrusted sums of money to his subordinates for investment, and what they did with it; about the employment of casual labor in a vineyard and the question of wages and hours that arose.

We have said something about the place of the Bible in the living Christian tradition which preachers represent and for which they function; we have discussed a few of the problems or questions which are raised both for preachers and for people; and we have tried to sum up the theological and moral implications of the gospel as these have been worked out in the tradition down the centuries.

To sum up: it is not just a question of extending the limits of what is to be known and assimilated, but of realizing that, in order to focus the subject matter of our studies correctly, we have to reconceive its nature in the light of the best of all available thought and information.

The question around which the crisis in most modern theology revolves can be summed up as that of immanence and transcendence, the historical and the timeless, the relative and the absolute.

Her opinion is summed up in the title, Whatever happened to Rob Bell, the pastor who questioned the gates of hell?

First, there is the inorganic form of individuality in which the composite whole is merely the sum of its parts, i.e., the entity in question is a simple «aggregate,» a non-individual, so to speak.

He says: «All that can be said from the standpoint of divine justification on the question (and the questions) of human law is summed up in this one statement: «the Church must have freedom to proclaim divine justification.»»

For far from being a deviation from biblical truth, this setting of man over against the sum total of things, his subject - status and the object - status and mutual externality of things themselves, are posited in the very idea of creation and of man's position vis - a-vis nature determined by it: it is the condition of man meant in the Bible, imposed by his createdness, to be accepted, acted through... In short, there are degrees of objectification... the question is not how to devise an adequate language for theology, but how to keep its necessary inadequacy transparent for what is to be indicated by it...» Hans Jonas, Phenomenon of Life, pp. 258 - 59; cf. also Schubert Ogden's helpful discussion on «Theology and Objectivity,» Journal of Religion 45 (1965): 175 - 95; Ian G. Barbour, Issues in Science and Religion (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice - Hall, 1966), pp. 175 - 206; and Michael Polanyi, Personal Knowledge (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962in the very idea of creation and of man's position vis - a-vis nature determined by it: it is the condition of man meant in the Bible, imposed by his createdness, to be accepted, acted through... In short, there are degrees of objectification... the question is not how to devise an adequate language for theology, but how to keep its necessary inadequacy transparent for what is to be indicated by it...» Hans Jonas, Phenomenon of Life, pp. 258 - 59; cf. also Schubert Ogden's helpful discussion on «Theology and Objectivity,» Journal of Religion 45 (1965): 175 - 95; Ian G. Barbour, Issues in Science and Religion (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice - Hall, 1966), pp. 175 - 206; and Michael Polanyi, Personal Knowledge (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962in the Bible, imposed by his createdness, to be accepted, acted through... In short, there are degrees of objectification... the question is not how to devise an adequate language for theology, but how to keep its necessary inadequacy transparent for what is to be indicated by it...» Hans Jonas, Phenomenon of Life, pp. 258 - 59; cf. also Schubert Ogden's helpful discussion on «Theology and Objectivity,» Journal of Religion 45 (1965): 175 - 95; Ian G. Barbour, Issues in Science and Religion (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice - Hall, 1966), pp. 175 - 206; and Michael Polanyi, Personal Knowledge (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962In short, there are degrees of objectification... the question is not how to devise an adequate language for theology, but how to keep its necessary inadequacy transparent for what is to be indicated by it...» Hans Jonas, Phenomenon of Life, pp. 258 - 59; cf. also Schubert Ogden's helpful discussion on «Theology and Objectivity,» Journal of Religion 45 (1965): 175 - 95; Ian G. Barbour, Issues in Science and Religion (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice - Hall, 1966), pp. 175 - 206; and Michael Polanyi, Personal Knowledge (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962in Science and Religion (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice - Hall, 1966), pp. 175 - 206; and Michael Polanyi, Personal Knowledge (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962).

In a way my question about «totality» and «the refusal of distance» sums up the other questions and suggests that a stance which has a larger component of irony and understatement toward the self might be able to bear the fragmentary character of existence with less restlessness toward totality.

In this way, a peculiar completeness of summing up would be accounted for and the question of common characteristics would be seen as entirely secondary.

What I am talking about is summed up in the famous question of Robert Kennedy: «Why not?»

Like so many aspects of my spirituality, I am still a bit in - between, figuring out what I reclaim and what I relinquish, living with a few unanswered questions while relying heavily on the few things I do know — and almost all of those can be summed up in my complete and utter confidence in Love.

SUM: so, of course i will not answer a question that is asking me (in its assumptions) to affirm the very thing under debate.

When used in the historical terms with which I prefer to use it, globalization in so many ways sums up the dominant and encompassing reality (note that I underscore this word) of the collective life of people and nations in our time, so potent and full of issues and questions for or against human development, so that it presses upon everyone who wants to make sense of the times in which we live, or who wants to be concerned about «keeping and making life more human».

In the present book I have spoken only incidentally of the «case» for prayer; my purpose here is to make suggestions about the actual practice of prayer, including the question of its effectiveness, the various kinds of praying in which we may engage, the significant exercise of private prayer and of public prayer, the way in which the Lord's Supper (or Holy Communion or Eucharist call it what you will) sums up all our praying, and finally the point of prayer in the total context of Christian faith itselIn the present book I have spoken only incidentally of the «case» for prayer; my purpose here is to make suggestions about the actual practice of prayer, including the question of its effectiveness, the various kinds of praying in which we may engage, the significant exercise of private prayer and of public prayer, the way in which the Lord's Supper (or Holy Communion or Eucharist call it what you will) sums up all our praying, and finally the point of prayer in the total context of Christian faith itselin which we may engage, the significant exercise of private prayer and of public prayer, the way in which the Lord's Supper (or Holy Communion or Eucharist call it what you will) sums up all our praying, and finally the point of prayer in the total context of Christian faith itselin which the Lord's Supper (or Holy Communion or Eucharist call it what you will) sums up all our praying, and finally the point of prayer in the total context of Christian faith itselin the total context of Christian faith itself.

As he summed it up in The Myth of Sisyphus, the modern question — with God and transcendence gone — was suicide.

In short, although thousands of «alumni» and friends of the institute have been pleading and praying that the troublesome disclosures would cease so the seminars can continue untarnished, it is the present and former staff members themselves who are demanding answers to dozens of questions about how the large sums of institute money are spent.

whether for the right or wrong reasons, our leader chose to stay on when things took a turn of sorts... a new owner arrived on the scene, plans for a new stadium emerged and Wenger became the bearer of bad news... he sold us on a new story, one that required patience on our parts... financial constraints were the order of the day, so that the enormous sums spent on the new venue could be recouped... although some would question the validity of such claims, why wouldn't they believe their faithful leader... according to those within the hierarchy, the future never looked so bright, as this new home would ensure our place among the elites for years to come... as we all know now these claims were a well constructed fabrication and so those who feel they were duped in the process are infuriated and rightly so... the fact that this club and it's manager have continually misled the fans, especially following Gazidis's claims about our financial liquidity, simply rubbed more salt in an already gaping wound... this surely isn't how you treat your «family», especially when they supported you through the supposed «lean» years... it was a dirty trick played by Kroenke but the fact is was orchestrated by Wenger himself hurt the most... as for those in the media, many of whom are former players or longtime pundits, who observed the early years firsthand, saw this as the perfect opportunity to vent the anger they felt towards this pretentious man once and for all... all in all, karma's a bitch

@Jimbeam that story was not credible.Ut was made up.Also your questions have are not even in line with what am saying.You are asling this and that and bla bla bla.It was needless.Everybody who is here wants Arsenal to achieve success regardless of whether we have average players or not because that's what we as fans do.The thing I was trying to say is that the same people who here who are nagging and crying are the same people who claimed to have lowered their expectations for the transfer window.So why all this talk.Listen I'll even want Arsenal to even have a world class eleven and when we don't win the cup with that world class eleven i wonder who'll be blamed after that.The critical thinkers here will tell you the main thing worrying this club is not even about the players.It's all summed up in one word known as philosophy.

Wenger's attitude is summed up by the dismissive arrogance he demonstrated when questioned about the banner displayed at yesterday's game — you ignore the paying fans at your peril, they keep the club in business!

There will, no doubt be questions asked about the size of the club's wage bill, how much money there is in the transfer kitty and whether the price of match day tickets is likely to be reduced in view of the greatly enlarged sums pouring into the Club's coffers from both television deals and sponsorship.

And that basically summed up the opening half of what should have been a mouthwatering semi-final tie, which basically turned into a joke and made the two teams in question the laughing stocks of Europe.

Question marks will still been made over how United were unable to finish in the top four despite spending large sums in the transfer window though.

There is something joyfully chaotic about British politics, summed up by the manic bearpit that is the Commons in prime minister's questions.

(Grisanti calls this «big money,» which I guess is an in - the - eye - of - the - beholder question, but that's not a huge sum by Albany campaign cash standards).

If the contract sums were in excess of the thresholds approved by the PPA, it begs the question why these issues were not pointed out in the report of the tender evaluation panel, why the Deputy Chairpersons as member so the Review Panel did not point this out and why the Deputy Chairperson CS would approve the payments to Clicotech and Cads Contracts (same contracts, issued through same process) and ensure that payments on the contracts were effected without the approval of the Chairperson and with no notice to her.

(1) Your question is based on the ridiculous assumption that economy and politics is a zero sum game and that somehow being «for» middle class means you're «against» (or «don't care about») poor; (2) Leaving that aside, championing the case of 75 % of population over 25 % seems like a lot less of a political suicide than championing the case of 25 % over the 75 %, unless I don't quite understand how voting works in a democracy.

In reality the sum of many more questions and answers is needed before one can estimate the reality of private vs statutory health insurance.

This loophole raises accusations of undue secrecy and potentially calls into question the probity of those involved in procurement and handling of such large and anonymous sums, particularly when the elected party treasurer was unaware of the existence of the loans.

The sum in question for Conservative hotel rooms is around # 40,000.

The NI contribution in question is known as «Class 2» 2 and is a regular weekly sum payable by self - employed earners to establish their entitlement to contributory benefits such as the state retirement pension.

So this brings me to wonder a few things I'll list as questions below but they are all related and make sense to put here in this one question (a one stop read all summing it up):

The question is, why did they choose to spend such vast sums on extending targeted services to the middle class, while making such severe cuts to the welfare of the poorest in our society?

In sum, answering the simple question of who you are before you get back into the dating game when you're over 50 is essential to your well being and your confidence when you date.

In sum, questioning yourself in romantic situations can be a detriment to your relationship, and although you are over fifty, and dating - there is no need to give up that easilIn sum, questioning yourself in romantic situations can be a detriment to your relationship, and although you are over fifty, and dating - there is no need to give up that easilin romantic situations can be a detriment to your relationship, and although you are over fifty, and dating - there is no need to give up that easily.

I am better with specific questions then with any success at attempting to sum myself up in a little...

The aggregate sum of all this leaden exposition and gunmetal hullabaloo is a self - outsmarting genre masturbation session that doesn't answer key questions, contradicts itself fatally and constantly, and fails to elicit anything like interest or empathy in any of its great - looking characters.

The premise of A Million Ways... can basically be summed up in the form of a question: what if Brian Griffin were alive in the Old West?

However, in recent years a number of scholars have questioned the vast sums being devoted to educational technology.