Sentences with phrase «sum trading game»

Not exact matches

As Hensarling says, «Trade isn't a zero - sum game.»

And while trade isn't a zero - sum game — Americans aren't necessarily worse off because they have access to cheap foreign products — importing more than you export leads to a gradual erosion of wealth.

In Beijing, Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Lu Kang said Sino-U.S. trade relations should not be a zero - sum game, and that the two countries should use «constructive» means to manage tension.

Its a zero sum game and the individual is almost always on the wrong end of the trade.

He said the iShares FTSE / Xinhua China 25 ETF (NYSEArca: FXI) had gone up more than 10 percent in four trading sessions before selling off yesterday, suggesting something of a zero - sum game playing out in the realm of China - focused ETFs.

Increasing trade is a positive - sum game.

Whereas the previous 13 presidents — Democrats and Republicans, alike — have viewed trade as a mutually beneficial, win - win proposition that fosters economic growth and good relations among nations, Trump sees trade as a zero sum game with distinct winners and losers.

The prime minister added: «Some politicians talk as if trade were a zero - sum game, that one person's success in exporting is someone else's failure when they import.

Andis Sofianos, from the Department of Economics at the University of Heidelberg, said: «The core principle of working cooperatively and seeing the bigger picture also applies to international trade, where there is overwhelming evidence that free trade is a non-zero sum game i.e. all parties could benefit.

It extended its relatively unknown Buyback program, previously assoicated mostly with textbooks, movies, and video games, to include a wide range of electronics products including the iPad, the iPhone, the Samsung Galaxy, the Motorola Xoom, and all kinds of other devices that might — if you could trade them in for a decent sum — prepare the way for you to buy a Kindle tablet, both in terms of the need to replace functionality and the financial wherewithal to make the purchase.

In the end, we can never forget the unavoidable fact that trading and beating markets is a zero - sum game.

In the long run, derivatives trading is what mathematicians refer to as a «negative - sum game»: one player's gain is another's loss, minus commissions and other costs.

Trading activity usually far exceeds the need for financing assets; it becomes a game unto itself, and a zero - to - negative - sum game at that.

When you are playing a game that is overall negative - sum, i.e., the brokers suck cash out of the game proportionate to trading, the better players look for quality assets, and trade less.

Trading itself is a zero - sum game, but bearing risk is a positive sum game, if done with a margin of safety.

Those few who crave risk have casinos or day trading or Forex or commodities or some other «zero - sum - plus - costs» game, where they can give their money away to the «house» slowly or quickly.

In fact, it's less than a zero - sum game once you factor in the trading costs involved.

First, trading options is a zero - sum game: For every winner, there's a loser.

Markets are for trading, and trading is a negative - sum game.

This shift in power is not a zero - sum game, nor should it be: the U.S. and Asia should avoid trade wars at all costs, and we should seize opportunities for partnership on a range of issues, from climate change to nuclear proliferation.

«A classic positive - sum game in economic life is the trading of surpluses.

«Commerce is a positive - sum game in which everybody can win; as technological progress allows the exchange of goods and ideas over longer distances and among larger groups of trading partners, other people become more valuable alive than dead, and they are less likely to become targets of demonization and dehumanization».