Commentary and
summaries of cases before the Philadelphia - based 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
You will find ways to get
summaries of the cases before you read them (hint: look online or ask elder law students for outlines).
Not exact matches
The defendants said it includes a description
of one public corruption
case — the prosecution
of former Bridgeport (Connecticut) Mayor Joseph Ganim — with an outdated
summary of the law that applies to corruption
cases, and want the display covered or removed
before their trial starts.
In fact, since appearance
of the contemnors
before the Supreme Court (SC), their subsequent
summary trial (if there was one), conviction and the fines imposed on all in addition to the jailing
of the infamous Gang
of Three, the
case has generated a lot
of debate amongst Ghanaians in and outside Ghana.
The above is a brief
summary of the rules or criteria that must be met
before a personal income tax may be discharged in a bankruptcy
case.
We have assisted tens
of thousands
of British Columbians over the years through law reform, test
case litigation, systemic advocacy, delivery
of public legal education,
summary advice, workshops and representation
of clients
before administrative tribunals and the courts.
Commentary: The Supreme Court
of Canada in this
case, and in the
case of R. v. Conway, 2010 SCC 22 (see our blog
summary here) has made clear that tribunals must address Charter issues which are raised
before them (unless expressly exempted by their enabling statute).
Missing relevant
cases: inadequate selection
of databases in electronic sources: Using full text databases
before checking other resources first is a common mistake; use headnote /
summary databases (on westlawecarswell, eg.
In one
of the
cases before the appeal court, businessman Robert Hryniak is challenging Superior Court Justice Duncan Grace's
summary judgment ruling ordering him to pay investors $ 2 million in a civil fraud
case.
Adjudication may remain a «realistic alternative» (though in this context, that will often mean a
summary judgment if possible), but it has been true for decades that 95 + %
of civil
cases settle
before judgment.
Where a
summary offence is tried with an indictable offence (pursuant to s 40
of the Criminal Justice Act 1988), but the judge rules that there is no
case to answer on the indictable offence, the
summary offence does not have to be withdrawn from the jury and retried
before a magistrates» court.
The affirmation
of summary judgment in favor
of Anheuser - Busch, our client in an ERISA
case before the Eighth Circuit.
In a separate matter representing a national life insurer, LTL obtained
summary judgment in a multi-million dollar «bad faith»
case litigated
before the U.S. District Court for the Central District
of California.
The Court considered the guidance recently provided in the Supreme Court
of Canada decision in Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7, with respect to
summary judgment motion principles
before providing its analysis
of the
case.
(1) The Brennan Center posted a good
summary of the
case and links to all
of the briefs, including the ACLU's amicus brief (supporting judges who plan to mass - solicit money directly from anyone, including the lawyers and litigants who will appear
before those judges) and the ABA's amicus brief (supporting the Canon prohibiting such solicitation, whether in person or in writing).
Nevertheless, even in
cases involving serious acts
of violence, a court will still apply the contextual approach set out the Supreme Court
of Canada in McKinley
before deciding whether
summary dismissal is the proportionate response to the act
of workplace violence.
D. New Mexico, 2014 (Docket No. 11 - CV -784-BRB / RHS), a New Mexico federal court granted the defendants» motions for
summary judgment, ruling that the plaintiff's failure to designate an expert witness on the issue
of medical causation
before an April 17, 2013 deadline required that the
case be thrown out.
The
case was
before the advent
of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 and the judge granted
summary judgment under RSC Ord 14 and injunctions to prevent the use
of the domain names by the defendants.
l When the
case involves an allegation
of serious fraud or dishonesty, generally conclusions on such issues ought to be reached at trial, caution ought to be exercised
before giving
summary judgment in a
case of that nature (Wrexham Associated Football Club v Crucialmove Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 237, [2006] All ER (D) 199 (Mar)-RRB-.
In 2014, Weil won a significant victory
before the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit that affirmed the trial court's Daubert and
summary judgment orders in the lead
case, which excluded plaintiffs» expert testimony and resultantly found that plaintiffs could not sustain their burden
of proof.
In the Lam
case, MacDonald put forward a Supreme Court
of Canada decision — Hryniak v. Mauldin — that talks about proportionality, affordable access to justice, and the fact these kind
of summary trial rules should be given a broad latitude and if a judge, in his or her discretion, feels they can grant judgment on the evidence
before them they should be allowed to do so.
Original policy document, death certificate, medical records (such as discharge
summary in
case of hospitalization
before death), KYC documents
of the insured and nominee.
Greeted patients in the OPD and prepared
case papers to ensure physicians have a brief
summary before physical assessment
of the patient
FAMILY LAW — APPEAL — PARENTING — where the mother appeals the
summary dismissal
of four contravention applications — where the mother appeals the
summary dismissal
of an Application in a
Case — where there was no substantive case before the Court — where the mother appeals a costs order in relation to the summary dismissal of her contravention applications — where the mother seeks orders that the substantive final parenting orders be rescinded — where the appeals lack each or both particularity and foundation — where each appeal is dismis
Case — where there was no substantive
case before the Court — where the mother appeals a costs order in relation to the summary dismissal of her contravention applications — where the mother seeks orders that the substantive final parenting orders be rescinded — where the appeals lack each or both particularity and foundation — where each appeal is dismis
case before the Court — where the mother appeals a costs order in relation to the
summary dismissal
of her contravention applications — where the mother seeks orders that the substantive final parenting orders be rescinded — where the appeals lack each or both particularity and foundation — where each appeal is dismissed.
Attorneys for Zillow filed a motion late last week asking the judge to grant
summary judgment in its favor as a matter
of law — referring to a recent 9th Circuit Court decision in the
case Perfect 10 Inc. v. Giganews Inc. —
before the jury is permitted to issue a verdict.
Editor's Note: Following the publication
of the above
summary, Kenneth Scala
of the Brokerage contacted Legal Affairs to alert us to the fact that the same noncompete at issue in the above
case had been upheld twice
before.