Not exact matches
In this case, the manufacturer's
summary judgment motion had asked the court not to consider it until
after it
ruled on the request to exclude.
Another interesting element of this argument is that the court undertook a
summary review in a procedure for injunctions because it argued that a withdrawal from the treaties would not be so easy
after ratification — even if the court would then
rule in the principal proceeding that the ratifications were unconstitutional.
STANLEY BURNTON LJ: The issues for determination were: (i) whether the
rule requiring payment of the standard case fee was unreasonable and unlawful; (ii) whether or not the ombudsman was under an obligation to consider dismissal of all complaints under DISP 3.3; (iii) whether the ombudsman could lawfully delegate consideration and exercise of the power under DISP 3.3 to a suitably qualified member of staff; (iv) whether the district judge had been entitled to find that each of the complaints had been considered for
summary dismissal, albeit by a consumer consultant; (v) if a complaint was not lawfully considered for
summary dismissal, and as a result was investigated, and
after investigation determined by the ombudsman adversely to the complainant, whether the firm was nonetheless liable to pay the standard case fee; and (vi) whether the answer to (v) depended on whether the complaint should have been dismissed under DISP 3.3.
This 1992 case has definitely walked down it, but at the ned of the day, the plaintiffs and their counsel were singing the Pink Floyd anthem «Another Brick in the Wall»
after consistently banging their collective heads against a popular procedural wall — Northern District of Illinois Local
Rule 12 governing the briefing and submission of
summary judgment motions.
An Indiana bicycle accident claim will go no further
after the Indiana Court of Appeals
ruled the trial court was wrong to deny
summary judgment favoring the defendant city.
The
rules on summary trials were modeled after similar rules in the British Columbia Court, what is now Rule 9 - 7 of the British Columbia Supreme Court Civil R
rules on
summary trials were modeled
after similar
rules in the British Columbia Court, what is now Rule 9 - 7 of the British Columbia Supreme Court Civil R
rules in the British Columbia Court, what is now
Rule 9 - 7 of the British Columbia Supreme Court Civil
RulesRules.
After service of a Reply alleging malice, C issued an application for
rulings on meaning and consequential orders for strike out /
summary judgment on the justification defence.
After announcing West Coast Life's planned term insurance rate increase a few days ago and the following up yesterday with a
summary of their
rules for transition to the new rates I queried West Coast about the huge discrepancy in time allowed between agents in the field and their in house Telelife process.