The following
summary analysis assumes that ESIO buys back $ 100M of stock at $ 6.56 and shows ESIO after the buy back is complete (the «Carrying» column shows the assets as they are carried in the financial statements, and the «Liquidating» column shows our estimate of the value of the assets in a liquidation):
Not exact matches
In a sensitivity
analysis, inclusion in the meta -
analysis of the
assumed zero estimates from the five studies (table 1) with no published mean differences attenuated the overall
summary estimate for systolic blood pressure (mean difference: — 1.0 mmHg, 95 percent CI: — 1.6; — 0.4; p = 0.002), but there was still strong evidence of an inverse association.
If that
summary is correct, I would think, that to continue these
analyses in a meaningful way and
assuming that the details of the more recent RCS algorithms will not be forthcoming, why not use a consensus (amongst our statistical minded participants here) best approach growth algorithm and see what kind of Yamal series results and how well it performs through sensitivity testing.