Sentences with phrase «summary of scientific knowledge»

If this rule is broken, one can not call this a summary of scientific knowledge.

It is a review and summary of scientific knowledge.

Not exact matches

(2) The Authority must prepare a plain English summary of the proposed Basin Plan (including an outline of the scientific knowledge and socio ‑ economic analysis on which the proposed Basin Plan is based).

Feeding the non-breastfed child 6 - 24 months of age (2004) Meeting report, Geneva, Switzerland, 8 - 10 March 2004 Complementary feeding: report of the global consultation (2003) Summary of guiding principles for complementary feeding of the breastfed child Report of informal meeting to review and develop indicators for complementary feeding (2002) Washington, D.C, 3 - 5 December 2002 Complementary feeding: family foods for breastfed children (2000) Complementary feeding of young children in developing countries (1998) A review of current scientific knowledge Complementary feeding of infants and young children: report of a technical consultation (1998) Joint WHO / UNICEF Consultation on Complementary Feeding, Montpellier, France, 28 - 30 November 1995 International code of Marketing of breast - milk substitutes

The overarching goal of the Framework for K - 12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas (National Research Council, 2012, Summary, para. 2) is to «ensure that by the end of 12th grade all students have some appreciation of the beauty and wonder of science; possess sufficient knowledge of science and engineering to engage in public discussions on related issues; are careful consumers of scientific and technological information related to their everyday lives; are able to continue to learn about science outside school; and have the skills to enter careers of their choice, including (but not limited to) careers in science, engineering, and technology (p. 1).»

Any useful summary of knowledge on the causes and consequences of climate change and possible responses would have to include a hard look at the substantial (and sobering) body of work on what shapes human behavior: how people absorb or ignore scientific information — including the climate panel's own reports — and what roadblocks in human behavior await the menu of possible policy options for limiting climate - related risks.

While IPCC's dozens of authors are unpaid, at least three of the NIPCC's four lead authors are paid by the Heartland Institute... The IPCC reviews the current state of scientific knowledge, while the NIPCC's references in its Summary for Policymakers include publications that date back to 1904 and few references from this century other than non-peer-reviewed reports from itself and its authors.

«It is sensible to ask for a scientific summary of the IPCC work, not addressing policy makers but as objective as possible a summary of the present status of our knowledge and ignorance about climate science.

Worry more about the correctness and objectivity of all the real scientific studies out there or the supposed «gold standard» IPCC summaries of climate knowledge, folks.

Instead of laboring to try to uphold a consensus that was tenuous from the outset, and which is now outdated, the IPCC should be striving to produce a summary of the contemporary bank of scientific knowledge.