It was hoped that by giving parties access to witness evidence at an earlier
stage in the
proceedings, the parties would have a clearer view
of the case and be encouraged to settle or apply for
summary judgment.
With respect to the Appellant's first ground, the Court
of Appeal found the argument
summary judgment should not have been granted on the basis
proceedings were still at an early
stage in their development «overlooks the direction provided by the Supreme Court
of Canada in Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7 (CanLII), [2014] S.C.J. No. 7 (S.C.C.), at paras. 49 and 66, that
summary judgment is to be granted where the record enables to motion judge to reach a fair and just determination on the merits and to do so in a timely, more affordable and proportionate manner.»
Accordingly, we carefully consider each case in which we act at an early
stage of the
proceedings to examine and analyze the prospects
of successfully bringing (and successfully responding to) a motion for
summary judgment.