Warmer temperatures melt the Arctic ice and exposes water, which absorbs more
sunlight than ice.
Not exact matches
But it is not clear how common
ice might be in the main asteroid belt, because
sunlight is expected to quickly vaporise
ice on the surfaces of airless bodies that fly closer to the sun
than Jupiter.
Polar
ice reflects more
sunlight back into space
than polar oceans or continents, helping to cool the overall climate.
Thick
ice reflects incoming
sunlight, but the melt ponds can transmit more
than 50 % of the light to the waters below, promoting under -
ice blooms, he says.
It may also explain why other bodies in the Kuiper belt are unusually bright, the researchers say: Fresh
ice is typically much brighter
than an ancient stagnant surface on which dust and substances produced by interactions with
sunlight or other radiation have built up through the ages.
Ice shelves (the floating front edges of glaciers that extend tens to hundreds of miles offshore) melt more because of contact with ocean water below them
than they do because of
sunlight.
The dark zones look lower
than the light - coloured ridges, perhaps because they absorbed more
sunlight, causing
ices below them to evaporate and the dark layer to sink down.
Anyone who accepts that
sunlight falling on
ice free waters which has less reflectivity
than sunlight falling on a large
ice mass covering those waters and also accepts that this reduction in albedo has a positive feedback effect, leading to further warming, can't help but opt for A or B, it seems to me.
Ice and snow scatter, transmit, and absorb
sunlight and radiant heat much differently
than water.
The Arctic is warming more
than twice as fast as the rest of the planet, because as
ice melts at the top of the world, there is less of it to reflect
sunlight back into space, so more of it is absorbed by ocean waters; more absorbed
sunlight means even warmer temperatures, which means more
ice melt a circular process known as Arctic amplification.
During the melt season the albedo of seasonal
ice is less
than multiyear Seasonal
ice absorbs and transmits more
sunlight to ocean
than multiyear Albedo evolution of seasonal sea
ice has 7 phases
The exposed open water caused by the wind divergence may absorb some additional
sunlight and melt more
ice than usual over the next few weeks (temperature - albedo feedback)[related NASA animation], but given that the sun is well on its way to setting for the winter, I think this effect will be fairly minimal.
The
ice normally reflects more heat and
sunlight back into space
than open ocean or bare ground, so when it is reduced, the Earth gets a small incremental heat flux that will result in an increase in temperatures.
The researchers say their data lines up better with the historic climate record
than other theories proposed to explain the Little
Ice Age, including changes in
sunlight and an increase in volcanic activity in the late 16th century.
Since the darker ocean surface absorbs more
sunlight than the bright
ice, this warms the region even further.
Less -
than - average cloudiness allowed more
sunlight to reach the
ice.
It has been noted for several decades that climate models tend to predict that Earth will become more sensitive to CO2 as, for example, polar
ice melts, exposing open ocean and land that absorb rather
than reflect
sunlight.
In retrospect, our overall outlook of setting a new record minimum based on the vast amount of FY
ice should have been tempered by the fact that the FY
ice over the pole should be thicker since it was the first
ice to grow last fall and the north pole is also colder
than the Eurasian and Alaskan coasts, and during summer this
ice is subject to less incident
sunlight.
But the Arctic sea
ice has hit near - record minimums of sea
ice since 2002, meaning the ocean is absorbing more
sunlight, and heat,
than it used to, leading to more
ice melt.
Although increased vegetation would sequester additional carbon, this would be more -
than - offset by the loss of the albedo effect, whereby
sunlight bounces off white (snow and
ice covered) parts of the Earth.
But much stronger albedo effects (a measure of how much
sunlight is simply reflected back out into space) might be generated by the high winds of the glacial era, giving 10 °C temperature changes rather
than the 1 °C excursion of the Little
Ice Age.
There is nothing implausible about dark water absorbing more
sunlight energy
than ice, and there is nothing implausible about more energy resulting in warmer temperatures.
Open ocean absorbs more energy from
sunlight than does
ice or snow;
And, in this case, what Dr. Meier is referring to is the fact that the albedo (reflectance) of
ice is higher
than water so that when the arctic is
ice - covered, more
sunlight gets reflected and less is absorbed.
An example of a feedback loop is when melting
ice turns to water, absorbs more
sunlight because water is darker
than ice, heats up, and causes more melting.
Snow and
ice reflect more
sunlight than bare ground, meaning less solar radiation is absorbed by the surface.
They are now quite complex and factor in things like; variable output by the sun, variations in the earth's orbit around the sun, greenhouse gases AND dust from volcanoes, greenhouse gases from decay in wetlands and from agriculture (rice paddies are artificial wetlands), differences in the reflectivity («albedo») of different surfaces (grass reflects more
sunlight than forest, and
ice much more
than open water etc.)... and there are many more.
Because meltwater is less reflective
than ice, the surface of the
ice sheet is already absorbing more
sunlight — previous research found that the reflectivity of the Greenland
ice has dropped by 6 percent in the last decade, according to an Ohio State University release on the new research.