Sentences with phrase «super subgroups»

Among their top concerns are the incorporation of super subgroups within state accountability systems, graduation rate calculations that include students who receive GEDs, and a lack of transparency and clarity about schools» performance.

Instead the grading system relies on two «super subgroups,» the bottom 25 percent of students at each school and the top 75 percent.

The Politics K - 12 Team at Education Week surveyed all 50 states regarding their use of «super subgroups» in their NCLB waivers that «can no longer be used in place of individual subgroups of student for accountability purposes» under ESSA.

The super subgroups combined smaller subgroups...

The super subgroups combined smaller subgroups of low - performing or disadvantaged students, but Ed Week notes that «civil rights advocates argued they allowed states to mask the performance of some student subgroups.»

Super subgroups can be formed by aggregating data in a variety of ways within a grade level and school year.

Advocates seeking transparency for individual racial / ethnic subgroups of students have been vocal in their opposition to the «super subgroup» approach.

That is, the super subgroup in the Oregon plan is only a substitute for no data, not for disaggregated data.

For smaller American Indian / Alaskan Native and Hawaiian Native / Pacific Islander subgroups, the majority of students in the subgroup remain uncovered if only students in that subgroup are pooled: the «super subgroup» strategy of aggregating across racial / ethnic groups is the only way to account for most students in these groups, although their data are not identifiable at the subgroup level.

We fear that putting students with disabilities, English language learners and minority students into one «super subgroup» will mask the individual needs of these distinct student subgroups and will prevent schools from tailoring interventions appropriately.

In its analysis of the eleven waiver applications, the Center on Education Policy found that nine state applicants will base almost all accountability decisions on the achievement of only two students groups; i.e., all students and a «disadvantaged» student group or «super subgroup.»

States must include each major racial / ethnic subgroup in school accountability systems and can not use a combined «super subgroup» of minority students.

Some states, including Indiana, award «bonus points» for academic growth of students in the super subgroup, as well as for growth among a school's top - performing students, testified Kati Haycock, president of the Education Trust, an organization dedicated to closing the achievement gap.

The consequences — from allowing states to render poor and minority kids invisible altogether through such subterfuges as lumping all of subgroups into a so - called super subgroup category, to ignoring the failures of suburban districts to improve education for all children, to intolerable incoherence in federal education policy — were clear from the beginning.

As Dropout Nation has reported over the past year, the Obama waiver gambit is already allowing 37 states and the District of Columbia to ignore poor and minority kids, rendering them invisible altogether, through such subterfuges as lumping all of subgroups into a so - called super subgroup category that obscures data on the performance of districts and schools in helping each and all kids.

Second, the state identified Focus Schools using a «super subgroup» measure that combined traditionally low - performing subgroups into an umbrella group.

However, the state groups together all students with special education needs, English learners and those from low - income families — call it a «super subgroup» — and measures average performance to determine if intervention is necessary.

It has been clear long ago that the Obama waiver gambit allows states to ignore poor and minority kids, rendering them invisible altogether, through such subterfuges as lumping all of subgroups into a so - called super subgroup category that obscures data on the performance of districts and schools in helping each and all kids.

They asked for clarification on why high growth in the «top 75 percent» of a school's student body can make up for poor growth in the «super subgroup.»

Not exact matches

For a subgroup of elderly adults called «super agers,» key brain regions resemble those of much younger people, according to a new study.

This can be considered a «mainline» super mario game, but has the potential to be a subgroup like the New Super series besuper mario game, but has the potential to be a subgroup like the New Super series beSuper series became.