Not exact matches
There is no source of law which confers
such a right on any
court, no matter what men call it (
superior or inferior).
Article 14 (1) Every person shall be entitled to his personal liberty and no person shall be deprived of his personal liberty except in the following cases and in accordance with procedure permitted by law; Article 19 (1) A person charged with a criminal offence shall be given a fair hearing within a reasonable time by a
court; Article 19 (11) No person shall be convicted of a criminal offence unless the offence is defined and the penalty for it is prescribed in a written law; Article 19 (12) Clause (11) of this article shall not prevent a Superior Court from punishing a person for contempt of itself notwithstanding that the act or omission constitution the contempt is not defined in a written law and the penalty is not so prescribed; and Article 126 (2) The Superior Courts shall be superior courts of record and shall have the power to commit for contempt to themselves and all such powers as were vested in a court of record immediately before the coming into force of this constitu
court; Article 19 (11) No person shall be convicted of a criminal offence unless the offence is defined and the penalty for it is prescribed in a written law; Article 19 (12) Clause (11) of this article shall not prevent a
Superior Court from punishing a person for contempt of itself notwithstanding that the act or omission constitution the contempt is not defined in a written law and the penalty is not so prescribed; and Article 126 (2) The Superior Courts shall be superior courts of record and shall have the power to commit for contempt to themselves and all such powers as were vested in a court of record immediately before the coming into force of this constitu
Court from punishing a person for contempt of itself notwithstanding that the act or omission constitution the contempt is not defined in a written law and the penalty is not so prescribed; and Article 126 (2) The
Superior Courts shall be superior courts of record and shall have the power to commit for contempt to themselves and all such powers as were vested in a court of record immediately before the coming into force of this constit
Courts shall be
superior courts of record and shall have the power to commit for contempt to themselves and all such powers as were vested in a court of record immediately before the coming into force of this constit
courts of record and shall have the power to commit for contempt to themselves and all
such powers as were vested in a
court of record immediately before the coming into force of this constitu
court of record immediately before the coming into force of this constitution.
To the extent that he acts on behalf of strata property managers and numerous strata corporations, he provides representation not just as litigation counsel appearing at the
superior Courts of British Columbia, at arbitration, mediation and administrative tribunals
such as the Human Rights Tribunal, Employment Standards and City Variance hearings, but also as legal advisor in the strata and real estate regulatory fields as well as all other areas of the law.
Quite simply, the
court drew a bright - line rule, stating that when an employer makes
such an admission, only claims under respondeat
superior are appropriate.
Samberg conducted a mini-survey of the online availability of state
superior court filings, looking at both commercial services
such as CourtLink and CourtExpress and at
courts» own websites.
The decision states that while
court hearing fees are permissible in principle, those that present «undue hardship» to litigants,
such that they are discouraged from accessing the
court system, violate core jurisdictional principles within the Constitution: «The historic task of the
superior courts is to resolve disputes between individuals and decide questions of private and public law.
Indiana's
superior courts are created by statute, and as
such, the method of selecting judges is determined by statute as well and varies from county to county.
It was the second time in seven years that Ritchie received a serious rebuke on appeal, since in 2004, another
superior court judge overturned his conviction in
such a case because of the judge's use of «boilerplate» reasons.
Such privative or ouster clauses have often been treated with a degree of contempt by the
courts particularly if they are seen as an attempt to exclude the supervisory powers by way of judicial review of the
superior courts over administrative action.
West Coast LEAF and CLAS will argue that when people are prohibited from raising Charter claims in the
superior courts in the context of
such complex and confusing administrative regimes, laws are shielded from the legal scrutiny that would ensure their compliance with the Charter.
In some respects,
such as the enforcement of an award across trans - boundaries, it is
superior to the
courts in that it benefits from the New York Convention that makes an award enforceable in more than 150 countries.
But because the decision will be a first for
superior courts in Canada, and because
such decisions are binding upon the lower
courts, the ruling will have broad impact.
In cases where a trial judge is not assigned,
such as pending preliminary inquiry, a review may be initiated in the
superior court of criminal jurisdiction.
Such fees constituted an unacceptable barrier on access to justice for those who were not «impoverished» yet for whom payment of hearing fees would nonetheless materially hinder their ability to have their case heard before a
superior court.
I'm going to explain and show for the next one they issue me, but I just wondered on the side if these «impose [d] monetary sanctions» were regulated because I called the number at the bottom of the
superior court notice and the lady who answered seemed like she didn't know what the cost for
such an «offense» was, but stated that if I sent $ 100 check to them, that would do it, which seemed arbitrary and suspicious; i.e., the whole first not knowing and then coming up with a round figure.
As far as I know the small claims
court has only limited equitable jurisdiction and so
such claims would need to be brought in a
superior court.
[w] e must hope that, in light of the problems presented by
such an expansive view of
superior courts» inherent jurisdiction, in future cases the Supreme
Court will be very careful in broadening its interpretation of what constitutes an infringement of section 96.
The way the idea of state action will impact
such litigation is, I expect — though perhaps I just hope — will be to justify a distinction between barriers to access to
superior courts created by the government itself — whether by its legislative, its executive, or its judicial branch — and those agreed to by the parties themselves.
On issues
such as the content of the record on judicial review applications, the extent to which administrative decision - makers can participate in judicial reviews of their decisions,
superior court review of federal prison decisions and tribunals» capacity to reconsider their decisions, Canadian
courts have recently come under pressure to update the procedural law to bring it into line with the substantive law.
TLA 2017 [1] holds that provinces may impose
such fees without interfering with the core jurisdiction of the
superior courts protected by s. 96 of the Constitution Act, 1867.
Neither parent has the
superior edge in
such a contest; the
court decides the issue by considering the child's best interests.