Sentences with phrase «supernatural claims made»
Do you believe in the supernatural claims made in the Bible?
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/
you should have read the paragraph after paragraph that Russ posted in a previous story when confronted with the simple question about providing evidence outside of the bible for the supernatural claims made in the bible......
Even if Jesus existed it doesn't prove any of the supernatural claims made about him.
Not exact matches
But when people go around making statements and claims that their particular supernatural explaination is just as real as the car in the street, don't be surprised that people will call them on their claim.
How is that atheists can claim there is no supernatural causation without any evidence whatsoever then accuse believers of making claims without evidence?
If you claim the methodology of neutralizing potentially confounding variables limits possibilities to that of the natural then you also make an argument for the supernatural never to be observed by science due to it's methodology.
Some parts have been proven to be fiction, other parts, mainly the supernatural claims, can not be verified, and do not make any sense, so referring to it as fiction would be accurate, though there are some historically accurate things in it.
If it makes any claim that involves spirits, demons, or other supernatural forces it's an example of someone who believes in supernatural forces wrongly claiming with no evidence that they are responsible for something they aren't.
Making unfounded claims of the supernatural, about «life after death», muddies the water, creates conflict, destroys what it claims to build.
By witnessing to the natural law, we can make our claims about the supernatural law — the law of Grace — all the more believable.
Austin: How about being honest and instead of making claims that you can't support, given that supernatural CA N'T be known, you include the disclaimer of «I believe...»?
Man - made fictional unverifiable claims of the supernatural baseless nonsense without a single thing to back it up made up stories to scare children.
We do not want all the bloodshed, teaching of pseudo science to children, the corruption of children's minds, government subsidies to those who claim to know the unknowable, elected leaders who consult with the supernatural in their decision - making, and the list just goes on and on.
True, there is no absolute evidence for either, and the burden of proof should be on the person who is making the claim (the one claiming a superpower or supernatural influence).
Once all the disclaimers have been made — that many religious beliefs are supremely difficult to test for truth because they refer to the supernatural or to that which it is beyond our mental powers to discern, or because (in the case of faith) they are values and not truth - claims — once all this has been said, we still have to admit that yes, of course the question of truth enters in here.
We do not have a set of «natural» goods and ends in which we can rest and be happy, we have only a supernatural end - «You have made us for yourself, O Lord, and our hearts are restless till they rest in You» - and yet no creature can make a claim on God which obliges Him.
But like with a lot of other supernatural religious as.sertions, human discoveries made the absudities of such claims apparant.
The problem I have with most religions is this; You have a book written by men long ago, when the earth was flat and the center of the universe, making amazing supernatural claims.
I am not making these claims as a supernatural «word of knowledge» or anything of that sort.
Atheism need not make any positive claims about the possible existence of a supernatural agent.
When atheists make remarks about «God», we are referring to «the supernatural being which you call God and the claims which you make about «him»».
Our declaration does not however make any claim of divine authorship or claim any supernatural events.
Your mythical bible makes all these insane supernatural claims of some jew 2000 years ago that can never and will never be proved.
When a group of people make extraordinary, supernatural, and unverifiable claims, it is called «Religion.»
A fertilized egg is not a «human life» but not a surprise from someone that makes claims of the supernatural based on their imagination.
When one person makes extraordinary, supernatural, and unverifiable claims, it is called «Insanity.»
The claims of miracles were also made by other religions and religious figures... when you understand why you reject those as being true you will understand why we reject the supernatural claims of Jesus.
When Christians stop caring what candidates believe or don't religiously and atheists stop irrationally claiming any supernatural belief makes you a danger to society and unfit for office, that'll be a good day.
The fact that man has made up thousands of gods... the fact that many of those stories were taken from previous cultures, the fact that 90 % of what Jesus allegedly said was taught by the Buddha 400 years earlier... FAR more evidence of any of the supernatural claims, which is absolutely zero, nothing, not one shred of evidence ever.
Didn't you just claim that ««Until there's «supernatural» stuff somewhere to do tests on it's just philosophical «Make up your mind!
All of them head to the Maryland woods to discover whether the supernatural claims about the Blair Witch are true, and after contradictory and inconclusive results over a single night they proceed to an abandoned broom factory (I'm not making this up), where Jeff currently lives.
For example, if an individual makes supernatural claims that Leprechauns were responsible for breaking a vase, the simpler explanation would be that he is mistaken, but ongoing ad hoc justifications (e.g. «and that's not me on the film; they tampered with that, too») successfully prevent outright falsification.