...
supernatural explanations always mean the end of inquiry: that's the way God wants it, end of story.
Not exact matches
So given two possible
explanations for something, one natural and one
supernatural, the natural
explanation must
always take precedence.
And a non-
supernatural explanation is just about
always going to be the more probable than a
supernatural one.
For some people, no
explanation (including ones with
supernatural implications) should be off limits, while a sceptic such as Ehrman will
always insist that the standard rules of historical enquiry can't be suspended for believers.